Have to be careful when comparing torque limit ratings as they sometimes state that the final drive ratio must be considered. In other words they are limiting the torque of the rider + motor via the final drive ratio. This is kind of tricky because they may need to do this because they have so many gears at under-drive ratios (is less than unity) but in my opinion the torque should be how much torque the IGH can accept at it's axle. If you consider that the Bafang M610 can generate 160nM or more at the motor bottom bracket and a 200kg rider standing on the cranks can generate an additional 160nm then with a 1:1 final drive ration (same cogs front and rear) the IGH would need to be rated at 320nM minimum and NONE are.Can someone tell me if all the lower 5 gears are an underdrive ratio such that the only way to have high speeds (say 20mph) with reasonable cadence is to have a small rear chain/belt sprocket and a larger front?
I love the paint job
Nice looking bike!
@TPEHAK
Do you have access to a 17" frame version to measure the standover height by any chance?
below is what I mean by that"
View attachment 156093
I was just on my RX for the first time in a while, beat the living snot out of that bike last night lol, gained a new appreciation for it! What year is yours? ill post it on my face book page, an RX is a bike i dont mind recommending!My Rize RX is for sale. Kootenays BC. Very well sorted. $2500 cdn includes lots, but it’s the programable motor. Have cable.
Mine is A 2020.I was just on my RX for the first time in a while, beat the living snot out of that bike last night lol, gained a new appreciation for it! What year is yours? ill post it on my face book page, an RX is a bike i dont mind recommending!
Probably because he's a cannabis versionYou want the Canbus version?
Any particular reason?
For many of us UART Ultra tuners, it's not about raw power, but a finely tuned delivery of that power that is controllable mostly by applied pedal torque. I personally would hate a bike that lifted the front wheel as you describe. I want my bike to take off smoothly and evenly, and have the power increase or decrease based on the terrain and my riding style.I also want to add UART version owners are not always satisfied with their Bike's performance they gotta change this and that and post results on EBR. It's over played. My Canbus motor Can make the front wheel rise when I stand on the pedal from a dead stop. I love it.
It’s difficult to know of the relative differences and whether the custom 60v version that I have is another beast altogether (pardon the pun).Well wouldn't UART afford you the ability to tame or make as aggressive as you want?
Or do you think that CANBUS adds a level of sophistication that UART can't achieve?
True.It’s difficult to know of the relative differences and whether the custom 60v version that I have is another beast altogether (pardon the pun).
It might also depend on how people are using their bikes. For instance, I wouldn’t use sport mode pas level 5 when crossing a road through traffic in a low gear and then curse the bike for being too aggressive. But some might.
Battery communication is mostly a matter of having enough wires strung to the cells: Most ebike BMS are only wired to sets of cells, rather than each cell individually; when wired together, you can only tell the state of each set, not it's individual cells, & have to take on faith that the individual cells in a set have "self balanced" via their hardwired bus connections.Maybe it's not necessary and UART is more than adequate and the benefits of CANBUS are things like battery communication, app integration and manufacturer lock down.
The motor does the pulling and the battery does the providingAnyone know the max amps the 52V battery can pull?
I was referring to battery communication with the motor controller / display for information such as this.Battery communication is mostly a matter of having enough wires strung to the cells: Most ebike BMS are only wired to sets of cells, rather than each cell individually; when wired together, you can only tell the state of each set, not it's individual cells, & have to take on faith that the individual cells in a set have "self balanced" via their hardwired bus connections.
I would love to wedge a 14s6p pack onto a Dorado pack's connector, but when making such a pack I'll want to wire it with an 84-cell BMS, rather than a BMS that only measures groups of cells.