But you touted the high charge rates.
That isn't a complete thought. However, I can try to guess what you're referring to. By asking you if you have any information on what the life span is if the cell is used gently, you're implying that I'm skating on my supposed "touting" position of the higher charging and discharging ability and quality of the cell.
1. The definition of "tout":
attempt to sell (something), typically by pestering people in an aggressive or bold manner.
"Jim was touting his wares"
So by that definition I was not touting because I have nothing and have never had anything to do with selling such batteries nor have or had any association with the company or their representative Susie other than to ask a price for a battery for my bike. I have not purchased any battery additional to the stock one my bike came with. So not touting. Your claim is simply wrong - maybe you were using hyperbole. Not acceptable, when you're calling BS on something, to be BS ing.
What I did was note commendation-worthy qualities of both type of cells under discussion that Susie is selling as her/their good recommendations for various ebikes.
And you still haven't replied responsively to my question "how was my statement horse puckey?"
Meanwhile I've now got an untrue accusation aimed at me, or maybe that's just hyperbole that you use casually. Anyway, it's a second deflection from the question, introduced by a wrong interpretation of what I was doing.
I’m Just simply offering the lessons learned from dealing with more than a few Battery builders and many hundreds of sales. I have no vested interest in promoting any one cell. Just the experience and suggestion that paper stats don’t tell the entire story.
So we're essentially even wrt we're both not selling batteries. Except that you know sellers, you attest for some, and it seems you have been doing biz at sometime or other. Me, never. So you're more likely to have tout qualities than I am. But that's all deflection - I am able to respond to it and knock it down and proceed. Nothing you've said makes what I said Horse pucky.
So maybe we get some info from you if not a responsive reply to the question. That's OK with me. Onward.
I have aGA cell battery as well as Grin battery test equipment. Again, nothing to sell, just suggesting that GA cells aren’t a panacea.
That's never been suggested by me as a panacea, has it? So why say that? More hyperbole? That is called a strawman argument. Knock down something that was of your own invention.
As always YMMV. My direct experience is limited to 8-10 different cells and running the packs through their paces. I’m far from an expert but I do have expanded experience that leads me to suggest choices might be better made on actual need not some forum reviews.
Nothing you've said shows that anything I said was horse puckey. I didn't suggest, say, or imply that needs were not what should be first consideration. So on principle, you're not actually saying anything to critique what I actually said, and I agree totally on needs. You're imagining something I neither said nor intimated, apparently.
Yup, pucky, just like one bike fits all posts.
You haven't shown anything that supports your notion. I agree that fitting needs, is the desired object.
Now you still haven't been able to say directly what was horse hockey because you imagined something that did not happen, and now my question about if you know what the GA cell does when it's treated gently has become simply another entanglement and it looks like you're not answering the question that you quoted in your post.
I didn't ask if it was a panacea. I asked if you have info on what happens to lifespan if you treat it gently and charge it gently.
I'm sure you've heard sometime of apples to apples comparisons? I'm asking if you have any knowledge of what happens when it's "apples to apples" time; comparing "same-same".
Maybe it means you're not interested in that question since you didn't reply responsively.
I think it's got to be a feature of any fair comparison if you're asserting a lifespan deficiency/price disadvantage. Without info on how that fairly judged cookie crumbles, why even argue one way or the other? How do you manage that?
OR perhaps you do have info on what happens to lifespan.
Got any? Thanks.