Catalyzt
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
Absolutely right, Motobecane was purchased by Yamaha and became MBK in around 1981.Sometime in the late 80s I think, Motobecane - the French bike company and rival to Peugeot, changed and became MBK or at least they did in Ireland & UK. I had one of their early mountain bikes around 1990. It was ok, mid range one, comparable to many others at the time; 26er, steel, 15 or 18 speed triple chainwheel, canti brakes etc etc but was just not that cool to own compared to the emerging US brands like Diamondback and later Specialized everyone was trying to get hold off. Same went for Raleigh or Peugeot mountain bikes - fine but bit boring! Later still and they seemed to disappear in Ireland so I was interested when you started showing your rides on here as I hadn't seen any in decades. It's a nice looking bike. I wonder did they go bust at some point and someone in US bought the name? Or just stopped distributing in Ire & UK.
BTW Is that the Hollywood Hills reservoir behind the bike? I remember walking around that back in 2018 or 19. Was staying in an airbnb off Franklin Ave. at the time. Great spot to have a decent walk. Lot of steep roads in those hills to test your gearing & motor!
Seeker (my bike) is an Ultra e-Adventure made by Motobecane USA... and I really don't know much about their history except that they seem to be an entirely different company that bought the trademark. I don't think they're connected to MBK or Yamaha. The frames are made by Kinect in Taiwan, where a lot of decent-to-good frame are made.
The HAL series of Motoboecane USA bikes is sometimes criticized for having an older geometry, but a lot of non-pros who don't ride competitively find it more comfortable, a better all-rounder. The Ultra e-Adventure is an outlier even in Motobecane USA's HAL lineup. There are almost no reviews available about them, and no literature available online-- I was pretty nervous pulling the trigger. I guessed by exhaustive research that in a stock colnfiguration it was just under 50 pounds, and that turned out to be exactly right. I got it down to 46 by adding a CF seat and going tubeless (and .2 of an inch narrower) with the tires.
The strangest thing about them is the E5000 motor, which is normally used on city bikes-- hard tails, often purchased in fleets to be used as rentals in resort towns, etc. (It only has three levels of assistance, ECO, NORM and HIGH) So, on the one hand, I do max out the motor quite a bit, and may be putting an unusual amount of strain on it-- I wonder if it was designed to withstand the punishment I'm giving it. On the other hand, I only do that for short periods of times except on my most aggressive climbs in the Verdugos.
Yes, that is the Hollywood reservoir! One thing that is a lot of fun is to ride to the reservoir from my house, put the bike into "ECO," and just blast around the loop at 18 or 19 MPH, which requires steady, moderate exertion, fast enough to make cornering really fun but not so fast that you frighten pedestrians or risk collision with other cyclists or little kids. Including getting there and back from my house, that's one of the few 30-35 minute rides I can take that provides steady, moderate cardio without the heart-pounding, extreme exertion of 10%+ hills.
I love older Raleighs! I still have my 1973 (ish) Raleigh Competition, Reynolds 532 of course, at my old roommate's apartment in New York. I can still ride it at my age, and I do, but I think I'm going to have to get straight handlebars for it soon. My neck and wrists really do not like the dropped bars!