True. This is why I tell people riding a Creo is like another sport. Or like driving a Ferrari. You can get going real fast, very quickly. Most people just don't need that speed. It's a joyride for sure, but do you really need to own such a machine? I think Stefan has noted that the Vado (non SL), because of it's torque and "4x you" can generate similar speed to a Creo and it's "2x you", and that's true. But the Vado doesn't invite you to just fly the way a Creo does. The Vado helps you have a great ride. The typical rider I see on a Creo isn't someone who's a 30, 40 year old professional who wants a speed machine. It's someone over 50 who used to ride fast, doesn't have the same power output, but still wants a bike with drop bars. It also seems pointless to me to have a restricted Creo. If your Creo isn't able to go up to 28mph (45kph) why would you even own it?
Regarding the need for speed and power, the Vado SL wasn't one of the original bikes Specialized had on the drawing board. But they found that owners of the Vado - people who wanted a more upright, fitness/commuter type bike - were spending most of their time in Eco mode. Most people just don't need that much power, hence the Vado SL was born, with the same motor as the Creo, in a much more easy riding package.
This is also part of the reason I fully expect to see a Vado EVO in the next couple of years. A Turbo Diverge Evo if you will. Sefan already turned his Vado SL into a gravel bike, and with the onslaught of people riding gravel, but not needing a "race" gravel bike like the Creo EVO, this makes total sense. LBS people expected to see it this year when the Tera showed up, but it wasn't the case.
Having said all that, the Creo is maybe the most impressive bike I've ever ridden.