When will Vado SL 4.0(or 5.0) upgrate in 2025

Hello everyone,thank you so much for the comments, discussions and advices here.
I went to Trek this morning and talked with their staff. As I am a student so the budget is tight and I found that trek MTB are so expensive and the staff told me if it is using within the city the MTB is not recommend even they have the larger power, battery and suspension. Since Trek and Specialized are two of my dreaming brands, and Trek ebike in Japan within my budget is almost MTB, so I have to give up Trek and I have to say specialized Vado sl 4.0 (or maybe 5.0) is my only option now.
Based on the information above, whether the vado sl 4.0(or 5.0) updated to 1.2 motor or teminated, from my point of view, there shall be a discount on the current version and the current version has not been updated for a long time as I see( I don't know 2 years are longer enough or not for ebikes). I was trying to contact several specilalized shops around the city i live in and I found they only provide vado sl 5.0 to have a try now and 4.0 seems only available on online shop( but the stock is quite enough). I think my only option is to wait. If specilaized promises that they will not update vado sl in the this year, i will absolutely buy one tomorrow but we all know it is impossible from the big company point of view. It is just due to my personal Consumption concept. Thank you so much!
 
My only gripe is that it would have been nice to have an assist level between sport and turbo for the times when sport isn’t quite enough and turbo is to much.
The assist is fully adjustable :) You could easily set it between the default Sport and Turbo (as a new Sport setting). The new Mastermind TCU also allows adjusting the assistance as you ride.
SL 1.2 motor is for people who need more than 1.1 Turbo.

Let me tell you guys when it all went wrong. Specialized was unique when the brand brought the lightweight/low power e-bikes in. The competition had no lightweight mid-drive motors at that time. Later, the competing brands brought stronger lightweight motors such as TQ HPR 50, Fazua, etc. From that moment, Specialized forgot it was making e-bikes for riders but rather went to compete with other brands. Now, the SL 1.1 had to disappear not to compete with Vado SL 2. We are forced now to buy "New Nescafe Gold with gold bars" but cannot get our favourite "Nescafe Gold Classic" anymore! Will SL2 sell? Probably not. The competing e-bikes may sell badly, too. It is irrelevant for the corporation. Are SL 2s selling slowly? "The whole SL idea was wrong from the start. Let's discontinue SL!"


One Nicolaus Copernicus wrote: "Bad money drive out good". Lived he today, he would treatise on e-bikes.
 
Last edited:
The assist is fully adjustable :) You could easily set it between the default Sport and Turbo (as a new Sport setting). The new Mastermind TCU also allows adjusting the assistance as you ride.
SL 1.2 motor is for people who need more than 1.1 Turbo.

Let me tell you guys when it all went wrong. Specialized was unique when the brand brought the lightweight/low power e-bikes in. The competition had no lightweight mid-drive motors at that time. Later, the competing brands brought stronger lightweight motors such as TQ HPR 50, Fazua, etc. From that moment, Specialized forgot it was making e-bikes for riders but rather went to compete with other brands. Now, the SL 1.1 had to disappear not to compete with Vado SL 2. We are forced now to buy "New Nescafe Gold with gold bars" but cannot get our favourite "Nescafe Gold Classic" anymore! Will SL2 sell? Probably not. The competing e-bikes may sell badly, too. It is irrelevant for the corporation. Are SL 2s selling slowly? "The whole SL idea was wrong from the start. Let's discontinue SL!"


One Nicolaus Copernicus wrote: "Bad money drive out good". Lived he today, he would treatise on e-bikes.
I think it's far more complicated than this. And this thread is probably not the one to have a wide ranging discussion. But in short Specialized are in trouble. They're not alone. For years the main competition was the rest of the big four Cannondale, Giant and Trek. Post covid the landscape has changed dramatically. It's like cars with EVs becoming a major part of the equation and major brands like Nissan, VW and Toyota feeling the pinch. Now Spesh is being attacked from all sides. With the commuter e bikes it's not just the other lightweight motors Fazua Bosch SX etc it's that the whole commuter market has several new bike brands undercutting them and in a cost of living crises when people are much more cautious about spending a lot of Money. In emtb the competition is ferocious and in road bikes also there are new brands eating away at their once dominant position and the bottom has fallen out of the traditional MTB market, the market Specialized grew from. Trek et all are fighting the same battle for survival. At the lower end of commuter market, new brands mostly hub bikes like Estarli and Eskute in UK, offer bikes that are well made, clean looking and offer good warranty and are cheaper - a friend of mine daughter is in college & they got her an Estarli e28.X for around £1500 and it's a lovely bike & she loves it. In emtbs the best seller right now is that DJI Amflow bike, which, like the market inroads that huge Chinese car companies like BYD are making with similar brilliant tech, well made, cheaper then traditional brands but still premium. And Specialized was already competing with the direct to consumer brands like Canyon, massive supermarket brands like Decathlon and European brands like Cube or Orbea. There's not a huge amount of space for Specialized against all that. Especially internationally. And it's not that these competitors bikes are cheaper but are inferior, far from it, bikes like the Decathlon Van Rysel RCR Pro is the top-range road bike used by the Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale team in the Tour de France - it is so popular it's constantly sold out and undercuts the Spesh Tarmac SL& by a few thousand (£5k to £9k approx) Soon the Chinese giant XDS high end carbon fibre road frames will be everywhere. Largest Chinese high end carbon bike manufacturer, they already make frames for a lot of western bike brands & supposedly 10 million bikes a year, with glitzy high end concept stores in every Chinese city. And the same is now happening in EMTB.

10, 20 years ago Specialized like the others couldn't compete with badly made but very cheap supermarket bikes so they went upmarket. Under this new onslaught they seem to be retreating in the same direction hence the carbon Vado SL, but I think to survive they need to compete with the new brands and make good bikes that are midrange in price especially as that upmarket region is shrinking and there is little brand loyalty just the excitement of the new. In cars Renault are attempting a similar approach with the release of the Renault 5 EV - it is marketed (successfully) on the love of the old petrol Renault 5 (My mum had one) and is selling for a reasonable price in street cool bright colours and from a reliable brand people trust and have a history with. Kind of what BMW did with the Mini. I personally think that's how legacy brands need to operate.

I think Spesh are in panic mode, I agree that if they are killing the Vado SL it's a short sighted decision, unless the bikes are just not selling in enough volume. And who can blame them for panicking. The bike market is volatile and only time will tell who survives and who thrives!
 
I think it's far more complicated than this. And this thread is probably not the one to have a wide ranging discussion. But in short Specialized are in trouble. They're not alone. For years the main competition was the rest of the big four Cannondale, Giant and Trek. Post covid the landscape has changed dramatically. It's like cars with EVs becoming a major part of the equation and major brands like Nissan, VW and Toyota feeling the pinch. Now Spesh is being attacked from all sides. With the commuter e bikes it's not just the other lightweight motors Fazua Bosch SX etc it's that the whole commuter market has several new bike brands undercutting them and in a cost of living crises when people are much more cautious about spending a lot of Money. In emtb the competition is ferocious and in road bikes also there are new brands eating away at their once dominant position and the bottom has fallen out of the traditional MTB market, the market Specialized grew from. Trek et all are fighting the same battle for survival. At the lower end of commuter market, new brands mostly hub bikes like Estarli and Eskute in UK, offer bikes that are well made, clean looking and offer good warranty and are cheaper - a friend of mine daughter is in college & they got her an Estarli e28.X for around £1500 and it's a lovely bike & she loves it. In emtbs the best seller right now is that DJI Amflow bike, which, like the market inroads that huge Chinese car companies like BYD are making with similar brilliant tech, well made, cheaper then traditional brands but still premium. And Specialized was already competing with the direct to consumer brands like Canyon, massive supermarket brands like Decathlon and European brands like Cube or Orbea. There's not a huge amount of space for Specialized against all that. Especially internationally. And it's not that these competitors bikes are cheaper but are inferior, far from it, bikes like the Decathlon Van Rysel RCR Pro is the top-range road bike used by the Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale team in the Tour de France - it is so popular it's constantly sold out and undercuts the Spesh Tarmac SL& by a few thousand (£5k to £9k approx) Soon the Chinese giant XDS high end carbon fibre road frames will be everywhere. Largest Chinese high end carbon bike manufacturer, they already make frames for a lot of western bike brands & supposedly 10 million bikes a year, with glitzy high end concept stores in every Chinese city. And the same is now happening in EMTB.

10, 20 years ago Specialized like the others couldn't compete with badly made but very cheap supermarket bikes so they went upmarket. Under this new onslaught they seem to be retreating in the same direction hence the carbon Vado SL, but I think to survive they need to compete with the new brands and make good bikes that are midrange in price especially as that upmarket region is shrinking and there is little brand loyalty just the excitement of the new. In cars Renault are attempting a similar approach with the release of the Renault 5 EV - it is marketed (successfully) on the love of the old petrol Renault 5 (My mum had one) and is selling for a reasonable price in street cool bright colours and from a reliable brand people trust and have a history with. Kind of what BMW did with the Mini. I personally think that's how legacy brands need to operate.

I think Spesh are in panic mode, I agree that if they are killing the Vado SL it's a short sighted decision, unless the bikes are just not selling in enough volume. And who can blame them for panicking. The bike market is volatile and only time will tell who survives and who thrives!
Thanks for the further details. I’ve not been round bikes for long so my perceptions are limited. I think you are fairly accurate in your analysis. This focus on the high end is not good for cycling nor in the best interest of the purported goals of the cycling and e-bike movements. Getting more bikes in the hands of more people requires more bikes. That more people can afford.

End of screed.
 
I think it's far more complicated than this. And this thread is probably not the one to have a wide ranging discussion. But in short Specialized are in trouble. They're not alone. For years the main competition was the rest of the big four Cannondale, Giant and Trek. Post covid the landscape has changed dramatically. It's like cars with EVs becoming a major part of the equation and major brands like Nissan, VW and Toyota feeling the pinch. Now Spesh is being attacked from all sides. With the commuter e bikes it's not just the other lightweight motors Fazua Bosch SX etc it's that the whole commuter market has several new bike brands undercutting them and in a cost of living crises when people are much more cautious about spending a lot of Money. In emtb the competition is ferocious and in road bikes also there are new brands eating away at their once dominant position and the bottom has fallen out of the traditional MTB market, the market Specialized grew from. Trek et all are fighting the same battle for survival. At the lower end of commuter market, new brands mostly hub bikes like Estarli and Eskute in UK, offer bikes that are well made, clean looking and offer good warranty and are cheaper - a friend of mine daughter is in college & they got her an Estarli e28.X for around £1500 and it's a lovely bike & she loves it. In emtbs the best seller right now is that DJI Amflow bike, which, like the market inroads that huge Chinese car companies like BYD are making with similar brilliant tech, well made, cheaper then traditional brands but still premium. And Specialized was already competing with the direct to consumer brands like Canyon, massive supermarket brands like Decathlon and European brands like Cube or Orbea. There's not a huge amount of space for Specialized against all that. Especially internationally. And it's not that these competitors bikes are cheaper but are inferior, far from it, bikes like the Decathlon Van Rysel RCR Pro is the top-range road bike used by the Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale team in the Tour de France - it is so popular it's constantly sold out and undercuts the Spesh Tarmac SL& by a few thousand (£5k to £9k approx) Soon the Chinese giant XDS high end carbon fibre road frames will be everywhere. Largest Chinese high end carbon bike manufacturer, they already make frames for a lot of western bike brands & supposedly 10 million bikes a year, with glitzy high end concept stores in every Chinese city. And the same is now happening in EMTB.

10, 20 years ago Specialized like the others couldn't compete with badly made but very cheap supermarket bikes so they went upmarket. Under this new onslaught they seem to be retreating in the same direction hence the carbon Vado SL, but I think to survive they need to compete with the new brands and make good bikes that are midrange in price especially as that upmarket region is shrinking and there is little brand loyalty just the excitement of the new. In cars Renault are attempting a similar approach with the release of the Renault 5 EV - it is marketed (successfully) on the love of the old petrol Renault 5 (My mum had one) and is selling for a reasonable price in street cool bright colours and from a reliable brand people trust and have a history with. Kind of what BMW did with the Mini. I personally think that's how legacy brands need to operate.

I think Spesh are in panic mode, I agree that if they are killing the Vado SL it's a short sighted decision, unless the bikes are just not selling in enough volume. And who can blame them for panicking. The bike market is volatile and only time will tell who survives and who thrives!
I agree—it’s a highly complex and evolving situation, and your comparison to the automotive industry’s struggle with EVs is quite apt. Specialized, like other legacy brands, is facing a multifaceted challenge post-COVID, which includes increased competition, changing consumer preferences, and economic pressures. The rise of direct-to-consumer brands, the proliferation of well-made and affordable commuter e-bikes, and the emergence of new global players like DJI and XDS are undeniably reshaping the market.

Specialized is undoubtedly feeling the pressure across the board. In the commuter e-bike segment, brands like Estarli, Eskute, and others are offering attractive, feature-rich bikes at significantly lower price points, which appeal to cost-conscious consumers. Your example of the Estarli e28.X illustrates how these brands are winning over customers with a balance of quality, affordability, and aesthetics. In road and mountain biking, brands like Decathlon (Van Rysel) and Cube are undercutting Specialized with bikes that are not just cheaper but also highly competitive in terms of performance.

The challenge for Specialized and other big brands is twofold: maintaining their premium image while also finding ways to compete in the mid-range market without diluting their brand. As you pointed out, the bottom has fallen out of the traditional MTB market, and the upmarket strategy that worked for them a decade ago may not be sustainable anymore. Specialized’s retreat into higher-priced, niche models like the Carbon Vado SL may make sense in the short term, but it risks alienating potential buyers in the increasingly crowded and competitive mid-range segment.

The comparison to Renault’s revival of the 5 EV is interesting. Leveraging brand heritage while offering accessible, stylish, and reliable products could indeed be a way forward. However, unlike the automotive industry, where brand loyalty is often strong, the bike market seems to have much less of it—particularly with the rise of new brands delivering great value and innovation.

Specialized may be in 'panic mode,' but they’re not alone. Trek, Giant, and Cannondale are also fighting similar battles. It will be fascinating to see whether they adapt successfully or whether new players will reshape the industry entirely. As you said, the bike market is volatile, and only time will tell who survives and thrives.
 
Besides the mentioned battle of the brands we do not want to forget that C'dale is Ponbike at this moment, Giant is mainly a supplier for al the other brands. Trek is a private corp (JB). Spesh parent company is a different story...

also no need to say that the sales bubble did burst just after covid, so dealers are still full in their stock, so the bikes build after the the deliveries of the parts (finally after a very long leadtime) which could not be canceld at the long term planning at the part suppliers leads to an enormous cash flow problem. Al the funds at the brands are in dead stock, those bikes and parts are sitting in warehouses just costing money so that is risk for the longer term. I do know that a lot of releases are held back just so that the existing stock can slowly be released into the market. New models are held back so they do not butcher the sales of the dealers with older stock and that could lead not just for the downfall of dealers (which feed the brands) but also cause a further disruption in the bike market. We've those issues around the globe with for example the decline in sales for Shimano with 12% last year, also pausing their releases of new groups. Also big groups of dealershi[ps went down due to costcutting sales which lead to a negative cashflows for the financers (think internetstores.de or some big dealers in the UK). Even bike brands are allready going bankrupt around the globe. Estimation is that it would atleast take it into 2026 to have these market disruoptions to be cooled down a bit. But we also have the new reality fro the USA now, I've seen dealers in my region stopping dealerships of certain brands so the could focu on the bigger EU brands to support this local economy.


I am afraid that there wil be a lot more water to have gone through the Rhine river before the bike industrie is back in better shape.


In this case I do think that there is a plan behind this release of this sl2 platform just to not delay any roi and not to disturb other models still on stock. So we just hope that the guys in Arnhem can cope with this situation. The problem in that is also that al major brands depend on the sales of e-bikes, without them the "analogue" bikes are not enough to keep them floating.
 
Besides the mentioned battle of the brands we do not want to forget that C'dale is Ponbike at this moment, Giant is mainly a supplier for al the other brands. Trek is a private corp (JB). Spesh parent company is a different story...

also no need to say that the sales bubble did burst just after covid, so dealers are still full in their stock, so the bikes build after the the deliveries of the parts (finally after a very long leadtime) which could not be canceld at the long term planning at the part suppliers leads to an enormous cash flow problem. Al the funds at the brands are in dead stock, those bikes and parts are sitting in warehouses just costing money so that is risk for the longer term. I do know that a lot of releases are held back just so that the existing stock can slowly be released into the market. New models are held back so they do not butcher the sales of the dealers with older stock and that could lead not just for the downfall of dealers (which feed the brands) but also cause a further disruption in the bike market. We've those issues around the globe with for example the decline in sales for Shimano with 12% last year, also pausing their releases of new groups. Also big groups of dealershi[ps went down due to costcutting sales which lead to a negative cashflows for the financers (think internetstores.de or some big dealers in the UK). Even bike brands are allready going bankrupt around the globe. Estimation is that it would atleast take it into 2026 to have these market disruoptions to be cooled down a bit. But we also have the new reality fro the USA now, I've seen dealers in my region stopping dealerships of certain brands so the could focu on the bigger EU brands to support this local economy.


I am afraid that there wil be a lot more water to have gone through the Rhine river before the bike industrie is back in better shape.


In this case I do think that there is a plan behind this release of this sl2 platform just to not delay any roi and not to disturb other models still on stock. So we just hope that the guys in Arnhem can cope with this situation. The problem in that is also that al major brands depend on the sales of e-bikes, without them the "analogue" bikes are not enough to keep them floating.
It is a nice analysis @Base, thank you.

Don't you think the overproduced Vado SL e-bikes have almost all sold out by now? I'm sure many people would be willing to buy a slightly upgraded "SL 1.1" (perhaps going back to the Shimano drivetrain, perhaps the CUES?) However, Specialized has made its move by releasing its new "semi commuter" Vado SL 2 Carbon, which is not exactly what the riders wanted from a lightweight fitness e-bike. Now, Specialized cannot release a new SL 1.1 Vado as that would cannibalize the sales of the SL 2 Carbon. If any sales come. What I am afraid to see this September is a new Vado SL 2 Alloy, again, not what we have been waiting for.

I can see more strange business decisions from Specialized. For example, the new Vado S IGH. It is a 45 km/h S-Pedelec. Who actually needs it in the EU? Would you buy, register, insure, place a number plate on an e-bike and then only ride it with traffic in the Netherlands wearing a helmet? The only two European countries that could be interested with S-Pedelecs would be Switzerland and Denmark where S-Pedelec rules are lax. Specialized made its last S-Pedelec in 2019. Why to release a new Euro S-Pedelec now in 2025?
 
Since most Speed-pedelacs are via Leasing constructions, that is an interesting market. I heard that Klever is pulling over resources into the Netherland to setup their backoffice. Also there is still the debate on the LEV regulations... Although I am more in the DIN79010 or upcoming EN17860 corner of the bussiness I do think that the e-moped bussines is going to go via leasing and since a lot of companies like Brekr for instance cannot keep up with the cashflows and Spesh did develop the platform so it could be a S-bike (hence the extra weight penalties we also see at some Ponbike and Accell models) they need to sqeuze all out of it.

And yes, there are some local initiatives to get these S-bikes here and there back on the bike-lanes... not a smart move since we try to get the mopeds back on the street in Amsterdam after zoning it to a 30km/h speed-limit. So in some municipalities it is requirerd to ride a S-bike on the road, some it is on the bike-lanes and in some have the right to ride on either....

So is it a smart move to get a S-bike back in the catalogeue? I dont know, for leasing it would be interesting, for private owning I doubt it. Sames apllies for EV's if you see the export numbers of ex-leasing, they all go abroad. If we look at KBC leasing in Belgium, most of their e-bikes are bought by the leasing riders, the S-bikes however all go to a central hub who get's rid of them via big parties who ship them abroad.

Either way, there is some cash in the development of these platforms and they need to make a roi, so it could be their best gamble to see some back. I do know their old office in Sheerenberg and also Arnhem.... and the big lay-offs of staff in the near past. so fingers crossed
 
aha, shimanos figures for last year just popped online, they went down 22% on operational profit resulting in a decline of 4,5% profit. this year will be brake even they think and a minor plus in 2026 as I read it now


and just thinking, Brompton also just made a few pounds last year writing just in black.... based on the early intro of the g-line. Their E-versions are stil not going as fast as they would have thought. Bromptons are niche and than the e-versions. The same is going on with the other folding bike brands, Tern going big wheels and longtails, Dahon focussing more on building for others.
 
Last edited:
Since most Speed-pedelacs are via Leasing constructions, that is an interesting market. I heard that Klever is pulling over resources into the Netherland to setup their backoffice. Also there is still the debate on the LEV regulations... Although I am more in the DIN79010 or upcoming EN17860 corner of the bussiness I do think that the e-moped bussines is going to go via leasing and since a lot of companies like Brekr for instance cannot keep up with the cashflows and Spesh did develop the platform so it could be a S-bike (hence the extra weight penalties we also see at some Ponbike and Accell models) they need to sqeuze all out of it.

And yes, there are some local initiatives to get these S-bikes here and there back on the bike-lanes... not a smart move since we try to get the mopeds back on the street in Amsterdam after zoning it to a 30km/h speed-limit. So in some municipalities it is requirerd to ride a S-bike on the road, some it is on the bike-lanes and in some have the right to ride on either....

So is it a smart move to get a S-bike back in the catalogeue? I dont know, for leasing it would be interesting, for private owning I doubt it. Sames apllies for EV's if you see the export numbers of ex-leasing, they all go abroad. If we look at KBC leasing in Belgium, most of their e-bikes are bought by the leasing riders, the S-bikes however all go to a central hub who get's rid of them via big parties who ship them abroad.

Either way, there is some cash in the development of these platforms and they need to make a roi, so it could be their best gamble to see some back. I do know their old office in Sheerenberg and also Arnhem.... and the big lay-offs of staff in the near past. so fingers crossed
Interesting to see the things from another perspective, thank you!
 
Interesting to see the things from another perspective, thank you!
Hi everyone,
New Member and first time engaging directly, apologies for my barebones profile. I'll be working on that, hopefully with an ebike highlighted in the near future.

I am a lifelong cyclist, mainly mixed road and gravel over the years. I have a 20+ yr old Specialized Rockhopper that I've adapted for touring trips, and it's done well for me. However, I'm in my 60s and can use a little help with hills locally and on extended trips. All the great things described by members, Stefan and others, regarding the Vado SL series being the most traditional biking experience has me gravitating toward that series.

I know this thread morphed a bit from it's inception but, since it's been raised, are there any major concerns with Vado SL parts and support if Specialized does discontinue the entire line?

Thanks for your thoughts,
TomO
 
Hi everyone,
New Member and first time engaging directly, apologies for my barebones profile. I'll be working on that, hopefully with an ebike highlighted in the near future.

I am a lifelong cyclist, mainly mixed road and gravel over the years. I have a 20+ yr old Specialized Rockhopper that I've adapted for touring trips, and it's done well for me. However, I'm in my 60s and can use a little help with hills locally and on extended trips. All the great things described by members, Stefan and others, regarding the Vado SL series being the most traditional biking experience has me gravitating toward that series.

I know this thread morphed a bit from it's inception but, since it's been raised, are there any major concerns with Vado SL parts and support if Specialized does discontinue the entire line?

Thanks for your thoughts,
TomO
Welcome aboard! As a recent SL 5.0 buyer, I'd like to know that myself.
 
Is it just me or is the Specialized naming/number scheme very confusing? Then you pull up the website and they're all mixed together.
 
Is it just me or is the Specialized naming/number scheme very confusing? Then you pull up the website and they're all mixed together.
It is only you :)

Older SL e-bikes:
  • Vado SL 4.0 (also EQ, also ST)
  • Vado SL 5.0 (also EQ, also ST)
New SL e-bikes:
  • Vado SL 2 4.0: alloy
  • Vado SL 2 5.0: alloy
  • Vado SL 2 6.0 Carbon: carbon fibre
 
Something to consider for folks who plan to do some fitness riding on their SL...

20240918_091222.jpg

Don't know which display comes with which Vado SL model or what they're properly called. But the MasterMind TCU on my SL (1) 5.0 has the partly customized start-up page above.

20240918_085144.jpg

And I really value its ability to show me real-time assist mode, rider power, and cadence at a glance on a 2nd custom page. With only these two pages, it's quick and easy to toggle between them with the handlebar remote

By all accounts, the built-in power meter isn't the most accurate. But it's plenty good enough for my purposes:

1 Helps me understand my own limits and the external resistances I'm up against at the moment.

2. Helps me keep cadence in the 82-92 RPM power sweet spot that the motor and I share — and that my old knees strongly prefer.

3. Gently prods me to work a little harder. Result: Noticeable gains in sustainable rider power over the first 6 months of ownership.

I'd happily pay the 5.0 premium again for that display, the 12-speed drivetrain with 11-50t cassette, the Future Shock 1.5, the carbon fork, and the tubeless-ready rims. With tubeless tires installed, the last 3 add welcome compliance to the alloy frame.
 
Back