Hey, perhaps one of you math/numbers whiz folks can help a brother out here… two bikes, 1X setups, 1 to 1 ratios on each, one is 42:42, the other 36:36. Everything else being equal, which has more oomph for climbing, and how come?
And since nothing else is ever equal, if the 36:36 bike has about ten less alleged Newton meters, what does that do to the picture?
Dave: Only the gear ratio counts here. The 36-36T or 42-42T gearing is 1:1 and both work identically.
Now, 10 Nm less is by standard 62.8 W less. How to determine the performance?
For climbing, you need to dececide on the minimum rideable speed uphill, let it be 5 mph.
Use
Speed at Cadence Calculator first. Enter all necessary data, of which the cadence the rider can maintain is vital. An example:
This is for my Vado, the granny gear (44-46T). My requirement is riding at 10 km/h (6 mph). As you can see, the gearing I have will allow me maintainong 6 mph at the cadence between 70 and 80, which is doable for me. Now, will I climb my hill?!
The
Bike Calculator is your friend here. An example:
Red are the input fields, Green is the calculated speed. Having all parameters fixed, only manipulate the Power to get at the desired Speed.
In my case, I need 625 W on the chainring to get me at 6 mph. My motor can provide up to 520 W mechanical. I need to pedal at least at 105 W. (In reality, it is not that simple, and you have to pedal harder to force the motor to max out).
I did that climb. I travelled at 6 mph indeed there
-----------
The last thing: If you trust the torque for your motor as given by the marketing department
just multiply it by 6.28 and you will get the max mechanical power of your motor.