My MDX/RLX hybrids are performance hybrids with the same EV system components you find in the +$150,000 Acura NSX sport car (just have a different V-6 engine for each vehicle). Increased performance, handling, and braking using EV components with the side effect of improved mpgs instead of using Turbos and/or supercharger. These vehicles would need a battery pack 7X-10X larger/heavier/take up more space to get +25 mile plug-in EV range. Starting to see more vehicles today that are leaning towards performance hybrids with the side effect of improved mpgs.
It seems hybrid vehicles of the past were low performance mpgs hybrid like the Toyota Prius/Camry or Honda Insight/Civic. That might be stuck in some potential buyer's heads since BEVs have +2X the performance compared to gas only and gas/hybrid versions. Factor in a lot hybrid models had a +$5000 premium for these low performance hybrids with break even cost +10 years out. Plus, all the issues, higher cost, and maintenance requirements with pure EVs and internal combustion only vehicles are now rolling into a hybrid vehicle (worst of both worlds type of thing long term). The integration of EV/ICE tech together and having it work seamlessly for +200,000 miles is very difficult compared to separate ICE or EV software alone.
I can understand why hybrid/plug-in hybrids are a low priority compared to just jumping ahead to BEVs. Switching to EVs reminds me of those old pictures of New York city at around 1900 when horse/buggy was the main form of transportation (ton of horse crap in the city streets, smell, health concerns). Switching to the automobile was the answer and infrastructure soon followed years/decades later along with improvements with features, range, performance, safety, and options with each model year. Gas powered cars are our version of "horse & buggy". It is going to take time and several generations before we see the benefits of EVs.
View attachment 170028