Gionnirocket
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Y. O.
Did I bring enough stash?DisNext in importance is tire pressure.
Boys and Girls let's do pre ride inspection.
What do I check '?
Did I bring enough stash?DisNext in importance is tire pressure.
Boys and Girls let's do pre ride inspection.
What do I check '?
The fact that the chains were not actually on a bicycle doesn't completely discredit the results of the testing. Did you watch th video? There's some pretty high tech tests being done that you just can't throw out the window because the chains weren't on a bike... All test results are "moot" ???well they were not on a bicycle also thats moot.
you keep forgetting the chains tested are sealed from dust because they have o rings. Bike chains dont. so the tests are not testing how well the lube got inside thew chain where it's needed on a bike. so yes they dont relate. there are plenty of bike lube tests that work much better.The fact that the chains were not actually on a bicycle doesn't completely discredit the results of the testing. Did you watch th video? There's some pretty high tech tests being done that you just can't throw out the window because the chains weren't on a bike... All test results are "moot" ???
What role does dirt or foreign matter play in wear on a chain? And let’s see the proof. And the second part to that would be how does it compare to metal on metal wear.
until someone comes up with a better test, it's all we've got.
You keep posting w/o actually having viewed the test. I'm not "forgetting" that o-ring chains are different than conventional chains and neither does the test. Actually the tests do ineed indicate how well the lube gets inside the chain where it's needed. Post up your better bike lube tests please.you keep forgetting the chains tested are sealed from dust because they have o rings. Bike chains dont. so the tests are not testing how well the lube got inside thew chain where it's needed on a bike. so yes they dont relate. there are plenty of bike lube tests that work much better.
ZFC is a brand of chain lube. Do you really think their tests are going to be "much better" than independent testing? LOLThat is well known and documented. External contamination is the major source of chain wear on bicycles.
One site you can visit for a comparison is Zero Friction Cycling, you can check the wear rate between contamination vs no contamination.
You should also check ZFC, those tests for bicycle chains are already much better than what you got.
I have seen plenty of lube test videos over the years. ones for bike chains. but what I found one lube is not going to work for everyone people ant different things. you cant get the longest lasting and the cleanest lube all in one one that can handle rain but stay clean. its all give and take.You keep posting w/o actually having viewed the test. I'm not "forgetting" that o-ring chains are different than conventional chains and neither does the test. Actually the tests do ineed indicate how well the lube gets inside the chain where it's needed. Post up your better bike lube tests please.
When mine gets that bad with rock and roll I think I'm going to run the chain through a chain cleaner. see if it lasts longer.I just did my chain today. This is what the rag looked like when I was done. I lube the chain every 100 miles to.View attachment 154214
ZFC is a brand of chain lube. Do you really think their tests are going to be "much better" than independent testing? LOL
I'd hazard a guess that a lube that does well on an o-ring chain will also do pretty well on a non o-ring chain. The chains are very similar in construction minus the o-rings>In fact I beieve the tester mentions non o-ring chains were part of the testing. I had a non o-ring chain on an 1100CC superbike and it lasted a long time w/ proper careIt is not a chain lube brand. He seems to sell several brands of lube on his website and may be biased.
That being said I did my own experimentation as I have explained in my original post and it mostly aligns with his results.
Maybe instead you should understand that tests of spray lubes on sealed motorcycle chains are not indicative of their effectiveness on bicycle chains.
If your theory were correct then no machine parts would need lubing?I believe contamination picked up on a drive train is being constantly displaced by the moving parts. Just as lubricant is being displaced from between roller and pin and side plates. All the debris and lubricant is looking for a resting place. It’s also being displaced from between the gear and chain. I don’t believe debris works its way into the chain, just as lubricant doesn’t. I think the contamination theory is overblown at the moment. I believe metal on metal wear is the culprit and the side to side movement at the rear gear cogs magnifies the issue. Therefore a lubricant with high psi capabilities and ability to flow would and is my choice, at the moment.
How did you come up with that conclusion? I don't understand your thought.If your theory were correct then no machine parts would need lubing?
I did not understand your thought in the first place!How did you come up with that conclusion? I don't understand your thought.
It pretty much says, use whatever you wantI did not understand your thought in the first place!