ProphetZarquon
Active Member
- Region
- USA
(Not so) fun fact: The Kilogram is no longer based on a fixed mass (such as by measuring the prior samples in Moles, as was suggested), but instead is now measured via the force exerted within a specific known gravitational field; in the process, we've not only made Kilogram calibration now require a (proprietary) device adjusted for each region of the Earth (or space), but also if read very carefully the definition now contains circular logic.First, thanks for the detailed reply!
As a quick Wikipedia check will show, the kilogram (kg) is the SI unit of mass, the Newton (N) = kg m/s² the SI unit of force, the Pascal (Pa) = N/m² the SI unit of pressure, and the Newton-meter (N m) the SI unit of torque.
Mass and force are 2 very different things. A typical digital scale measures weight W (a force) in N but reports mass M in kg using M = W / g, where g is some reference acceleration of gravity in m/s² baked into the scale firmware. Often this g is "standard gravity", with a value of 9.80665 m/s².
Likewise, to get a convenient index B of pedal force F, with B expressed in kg, you'd use something like B = F / g. The index would work as long as you used the same g every time.
Pedal pressure and pedal force are also 2 very different quantities. To get a pressure P from a force F, you use P = F /A, where A is the area over which F is applied in m².
Agree, an exponential progression of the max mechanical power or torque associated with each PAS level would feel more natural. The teeth on the cogs of a cassette grow roughly exponentially in the same way, and for the same reason.
We really should have gone with Moles, despite the drift involved.