Why do the top manufacturers embrace 36 volt/ 250 watt power systems?

I'm of the view more volts = more performance. Whether or not it's needed/desired/legal is another thing.

Comparing like for like - take a 48 volt equipped ebike and throw in a 52 volt battery - come back and tell what your findings are. Plenty of evidence around to suggest a performance boost of in the order of 7.5%.

A further example is the Frey Beast running 60 volts through the Bafang Ultra motor with the appropriate controller and generating torque of 240nm compared to the standard 160nm.
In reply to...

I have noticed most of the dedicated ebike manufactures that do offer 48 volt systems and 500w+ nominal motors don't have the top drive train components and thru axles found on bikes with 36 volt systems
 
Some airplanes use 24 volt systems because they can use a lighter gage wire to carry the same amperage thereby saving copper and weight. I have heard that some autos with miles of copper wiring are considering using a 24 volt system to save copper and weight.
I believe it is the amp hour of a battery, not the voltage that determines how much work it can do.
There must be a reason so many battery operated tools keep going to higher and volts. Maybe someone can enlighten us.
Small correction in the wording.
Amperage dictates wire size... I believe how you want to describe it is that the smaller wire can carry the same wattage using a higher voltage as less amperage is needed.
In general higher voltage is more efficient, that's why Europe uses 220v in homes.
The US decided 110v was safer in homes. In a commercial/industrial environment the US uses 277/480v systems.
As mentioned earlier higher voltage also adds performance. That's why the tool manufacturers are now in the +80v range now.
 
Last edited:
Low power hub motors, if you are talking Cannondale or Trek. Next, Stromer (a Swiss company) is very small compared to Cannondale or Trek.
Now, how do you define 42+ V? Fully charged voltage or nominal voltage (like 36, 48 or 52 V)? Because a fully charged 36 V battery has 42+ V actual voltage.



You meant Vado 5.0 (not the SL). Indeed, the full power Vado 5.0 has the peak power of 565 W (with the nominal 36 V battery).
Vado SL has the same system as Creo, that is, 48 V, 240/240 W nominal and max power. (Which only proofs that a motor of higher voltage does not need to be stronger than a 36 V one).

whoops yes, fixed!
 
Low power hub motors, if you are talking Cannondale or Trek. Next, Stromer (a Swiss company) is very small compared to Cannondale or Trek.
Now, how do you define 42+ V? Fully charged voltage or nominal voltage (like 36, 48 or 52 V)? Because a fully charged 36 V battery has 42+ V actual voltage.



You meant Vado 5.0 (not the SL). Indeed, the full power Vado 5.0 has the peak power of 565 W (with the nominal 36 V battery).
Vado SL has the same system as Creo, that is, 48 V, 240/240 W nominal and max power. (Which only proofs that a motor of higher voltage does not need to be stronger than a 36 V one).
Doesnt really proof anything

If you take that 36V motor and run it at 48V without any circuitry to limit power, it will produce more power.

https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.h...&bopen=true&batt_b=B4816_GA&cont=PR&cont_b=PR

Here is a good article, especially when comparing a 36V and 52V system
https://ebikes.ca/learn/power-ratings.html

If perhaps your argument is....at a limited power setting(i.e. 240W), there isnt much of a difference, you would be correct (mostly). I changed the speed of the 48V system to match the speed of the 36v system (which uses same power). The efficiency is basically identical. There would be additional losses in the 36V system not calculated in this simulator in the power wires. power circuitry (i.e. FETs) and the IR of the battery all of which would generate heat.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.h...R&autothrot_b=true&throt_b=10.999644106207965

If this is indeed your argument it seems silly and focused around your euro-centric view of the world which doesnt apply to probably 90%+ of the users on this site. Despite the size of the euro ebike market as you claim, it doesnt apply to most users here and doesnt negate the physics of electrical motors.

I love my 2021 Turbo Levo (36V), its great for a class 1 strictly offroad MTB and I have no use for more power unless traveling to the trailhead. My 52V DIY ebikes (mid and hub drive) outperform it in every other metric by significant margins.

With the 750W limit in the US, 48V is a better fit and why it has been chosen outside of the euro-spec bikes
 
Last edited:
Doesnt really proof anything

If you take that 36V motor and run it at 48V without any circuitry to limit power, it will produce more power.

https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.h...&bopen=true&batt_b=B4816_GA&cont=PR&cont_b=PR

If perhaps your argument is....at a limited power setting, there isnt much of a difference, you would be correct (mostly). I changed the speed of the 48V system to match the speed of the 36v system (which uses same power). The efficiency is basically identical. There would be additional losses in the 36V system not calculated in this simulator in the power wires. power circuitry (i.e. FETs) and the IR of the battery all of which would generate heat.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.h...R&autothrot_b=true&throt_b=10.999644106207965

If this is indeed your argument it seems silly and focused around your euro-centric view of the world which doesnt apply to probably 90% of the users on this site. Despite the size of the euro ebike market as you claim, it doesnt apply here and doesnt negate the physics of electrical motors.
How odd the system engineers at the largest e-bike brands seem to have different design criteria from yours.
 
Incorrect. Specialized also offers a 48 V/240 W motor on its SL line.

The reasons of the 250 W nominal (and up to, say, 565 W peak power) with maximum 4x Rider's Boost Factor are:
  • The European Union being the biggest e-bike market in the world (outside China)
  • The Euro regulation requiring a regular e-bike (treated equally with traditional bicycles) be limited to 250 W nominal
  • The Euro regulations also read "not more than 48 V"
  • A widely accepted industrial rule (in Europe, not in China of course) that the bike assistance shall not exceed the human power more than 4 times (otherwise it is a moped or a motorcycle)
  • No throttle, pedalling only
  • A less powerful e-bike can be more lightweight
  • In case of mid-motors, a 250 W nominal, 85-90 Nm motor is more than enough for either fast ride on the flat or steep climbs.
Interestingly, Stromer is a Swiss brand but it conforms to Euro rules, except they make 45 km/h (28 mph) e-bikes allowed both in Switzerland and the United States.

The reason Specialized has opted for 48 V in the lightweight less powerful SL line is the 48 V battery of capacity of 320 Wh will be as long as the e-bikes bottom frame tube but actually very slim, giving SL e-bikes a stealthy look.


No, it is the domain of the mass produced Chinese cr*pware.


Certainly you can ask Zen E-Bike in Canada to build such an e-bike for you. With a Chinese motor of course :) (Zen also builds e-bikes based on Bosch system, which is Euro).
SL line looks to be the exception to the rule , but they run only a 240 volt nominal motor with a the 325Wh 48v battery (and claim a range advantage over industry standard 625Wh 36v batts due to their batt being light weight), so not much of a power advatage for larger riders regardless of 48v battery.
 
Design criteria or doing what they can within the restrictions they need to comply with.
1 donkey power isn't much headroom
Exactly, 36V is fine for the lower power euro-spec bikes which is where all these systems are designed. I am in no way arguing that. Designing lower voltage electronics is also cheaper since higher voltage components usually cost more.

The point I am making is that this is ONLY valid in europe which 90%+ of the people on this site could care less about (even moreso about poland).

48V is a much better fit for the US 750W limit
 
Last edited:
Arguments always arise when Stefan tries to contradict simple physics by using the 'call to authority' argument philosophy

https://www.intelligentspeculation.com/blog/argument-from-authority
Our Hawaiian OP wrote:
Wondering why the big three (Trek, Giant, Specialized) only offer 36 volt , 500-625 Wh batteries and 250w nominal/ 500w peak motors on their ebikes? I have noticed most of the dedicated ebike manufactures that do offer 48 volt systems and 500w+ nominal motors don't have the top drive train components and thru axles found on bikes with 36 volt systems.
The fact is the premium brands are "Euro-centred" while the $2,000 rubbish comes with high voltage systems. Has not been the "e-bike fire" issue discussed recently?
Please explain lemming why the big brands use either 36 or 48 V systems. Also help me understand why there are ten times less e-bikes in North America than they are in Europe. And how that affects the business of the big brands.

SL line looks to be the exception to the rule , but they run only a 240 volt nominal motor with a the 325Wh 48v battery (and claim a range advantage over industry standard 625Wh 36v batts due to their batt being light weight), so not much of a power advatage for larger riders regardless of 48v battery.
Just a clarification first.
  • 240 W motor
  • 320 Wh, 48 V battery.
Now, it is not the battery light weight alone. It also comes with a lightweight motor. The e-bike can be designed the way it weighs 33 lbs. The 48 V system has been chosen because it allows making a slim but long battery, not for higher efficiency. Excellent range? Yes because SL e-bikes deliver roughly half of the power of the 36 V "heavy bikes" (requiring the rider pedal harder). There is a general trend among big brands to deliver low power lightweight motors with small batteries as a good share of the market simply needs bicycles with a little bit of boost (hills, tailwind).
 
The fact is the premium brands are "Euro-centred" while the $2,000 rubbish comes with high voltage systems. Has not been the "e-bike fire" issue discussed recently?
Please explain lemming why the big brands use either 36 or 48 V systems. Also help me understand why there are ten times less e-bikes in North America than they are in Europe. And how that affects the business of the big brands.
Its always fun to see how you choose to categorize and select 'facts' to prove your weak arguments. 'Call to authority' seems your preferred debating technique. I prefer well established physics.

No doubt the "ebike fire" issue is real and probably related to cheaper bikes with less quality control. I dont own any of those bikes(and never will). To characterize any bike that isnt one of the big 4 (motor wise) as garbage is too simplistic....but hey if that works for you..go for it. There could be many reasons besides your simplistic presentation...for example bad bms, chargers, charging practices or construction. I would need more info before making any further assumptions.

All ebikes use the same basic cells (really cheap ebikes might use cheaper mismatched cells or even 'clones'). As an example my Bulls and iZIP Moda (both Brose based 2018 designs) use samsung 35E 18650 cells. I have a pack from EM3EV with the same cells. These days the panasonic GA 18650 cell which I also have (used in teslas for awhile) seem a better choice supposedly due to ability to have more charge cycles. Newer bikes are coming with 21700 cells which are better still.

I only own batteries with individually fused cells. My assumption is all the big 4 motor manufacturers do this. I use EM3EV batteries which come with this feature. The older/cheaper method of using nickel strips to connect cells can have serious consequences. Ebike battery packs are built of parallel groups arranged in series (i.e. 14S 6P). If any cell in a parallel group shorts, all the adjacent parallel cells will dump their current into the shorted cell causing it to overheat and possibly catch on fire. This is something no BMS can protect against. For the same battery capacity, the argument could be made that a lower voltage pack would require more parallel cells and therefore would be more prone to fire for the case of a cell short. These days QC on cells is pretty good with the brands like panasonic and samsung.

I dont need to explain your 'Call to authority' approach to debating 36V vs 48V systems by speculation of the big 4 as its EE 101 stuff. The use of 36V could be for alot of things For the low power limit of 250W euro-based bikes, 36V is good enough only requiring about 7A for 250W and would be more cost effective. Would 48V be better..absolutely(from a pure engineering perspective) although the companies probably did a cost analysis and figured 36V would suffice (which it does for lower wattage euro-based bikes). There is also potential legacy issues. Many of the earlier ebikes were 36V and since 36V is fine for lower powered euro-bikes, why change. For my 36V Turbo levo, 36V is fine for offroad.

Legacy is real but not always the best solution over time (change horse to donkey to determine euro-bike equivalence)
http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html

Another 'Call to Authority' on the euro market being 10 times the US market. My point (which you choose to overlook) is that this site is not composed of 10x the users from europe compared to the US, so basically 90% of the users here dont care about your euro-centric views. Why dont you go hang out in euro ebike forums instead of polluting EBR with your euro-snob attitudes. Better yet, grab some tissues and hand lotion and review your strava stats.

Dont be a Stefan
 
Last edited:
Back