Why did you choose an Allant 7 vs Allant 8?

zipur

Active Member
Region
USA
Screen Shot 2021-05-24 at 11.53.42 AM.png
 
I have an allant8s but I would be just as happy with a allant7/7s.

It’s easy and cheap to upgrade the drivetrain on any bike so stock component hierarchy between the allant 7,8,9 wasn’t a factor in my purchase.

I chose the allant8s because I preferred the solid fork and the colour grey.
 
If I ever had to choose either, I'd go for the 8/8s because of:
  • Better brakes
  • Better drive-train
  • 625 Wh battery (vs 500 Wh)
  • The rigid fork is a good thing to me (vs. inexpensive coil sus fork) for lower weight, (and the big tyres provide enough of suspension).
I think if I were in the same position as when I was buying my Vado 5.0 (economically etc), I would have gone for 9.9s; not because of the carbon fibre frame (I don't need or want it) but because only 9.9s has the specs equal to or surpassing Vado 6.0. 9.9s is deadly expensive though.
 
We bought two 8s this spring for several reasons: better gearing; bigger battery, but most importantly, in stock vs not!

Interestingly, as a senior, I find going above 20 mph not so much fun, so the "s" part doesn't really matter. What does matter is 85nm, since we have some pretty steep hills in our area. In fact no matter which way I go from my house, I'll be climbing a 15-18% grade, either going or coming. Torque matters, as does low enough gearing.
 
I would take the 7+. 1) it has a suspension fork. 2) it has a rack. 3) I do not care about the extra display features and I do not want to pay extra for it or for the brighter headlight. 4 ) I would use the savings towards adding a second battery.
 
Last edited:
Interestingly, as a senior, I find going above 20 mph not so much fun, so the "s" part doesn't really matter. What does matter is 85nm, since we have some pretty steep hills in our area. In fact no matter which way I go from my house, I'll be climbing a 15-18% grade, either going or coming. Torque matters, as does low enough gearing.
Once I was seriously looking, I test rode the +7 first and really liked everything about it. Still do. Like rNH, I see no need for the extra speed. I love the frame and I’ve never heard one concern about it. For me the price is better, rack is better, suspension fork is better, and the CX is one of the best and the updates Trek/Bosch have offered have been great options.
 
Last edited:
I would take the 7+. 1) it has a suspension fork. 2) it has a rack. 3) I do not care about the extra display features and I do not want to pay extra for it or for the brighter headlight. 4 ) I would use the savings towards adding a second battery.
Me too but have been waiting 7 months for the 625wh spare battery.
 
We bought two 8s this spring for several reasons: better gearing; bigger battery, but most importantly, in stock vs not!

Interestingly, as a senior, I find going above 20 mph not so much fun, so the "s" part doesn't really matter. What does matter is 85nm, since we have some pretty steep hills in our area. In fact no matter which way I go from my house, I'll be climbing a 15-18% grade, either going or coming. Torque matters, as does low enough gearing.
I think the 8 Is awesome, I think the frame is the same as the 7. I also read the battery for the 8 would fit in a 7. I agree with you that as we get older, the need for speed decreases. It is acceptable to cruise along enjoying the world.
 
I think the 8 Is awesome, I think the frame is the same as the 7. I also read the battery for the 8 would fit in a 7. I agree with you that as we get older, the need for speed decreases. It is acceptable to cruise along enjoying the world.
8 & 7 do appear to have the same frame and should take the same battery with minor adjustments. In my experience, our two Allant+7 batteries need a bit of adjustment to the latch/locking mechanism to fit each other.
 
Dallant, I think you posted this somewhere else. It looks like the difference between the 500 & 625 battery is the spacer which reduced the amount of cells on the 500 batteries. Anyway, it’s a cool picture.

BDCDC8F9-5324-4278-A64A-0CB2232FC3EA.jpeg
 
Dallant, I think you posted this somewhere else. It looks like the difference between the 500 & 625 battery is the spacer which reduced the amount of cells on the 500 batteries. Anyway, it’s a cool picture.

View attachment 88509
Yeah, what’s sad is that my Trek guy has ALL the parts sitting in his shop like the painted cover, handle, latch, etc. to put my spare together. JUST NOT THE FRIGGING 625!🤬
 
Back