From Day 1, you can tell the guy felt like a second-class citizen for having to leave the comfort of his automobile to try out an ebike: "Already, I can see three key e-bike demographics: seekers of low-cost transportation, would-be cyclists who don't have the required lung capacity and car drivers who have lost their licences to the breathalyzer."
Let's hope his viewpoint is not widely accepted.
Crappy thread title.
I don't see anything objectionable here. He's not calling ebikers low status, he's saying thats how society sees them.
I'm not sure how he could be any clearer that these are his views and his "observations". I guess we're all just financially bankrupt, overweight, out of DUI rehab ebikers. Seems to be me that there would be few, if any, of that demographic, buying ebikes.
I think at times he was just trying to be witty without having any skill in that area.
Article was from 2014. And the "bike" was a cheap 12v lead-acid Chinese scooter (that sells for ~$500 on alibaba). Little wonder he was less than impressed.
I think he THOUGHT he did, but the crank was actually @ 5:37...idiot cant read a clock.The guy is an idiot. He doesn't even know how to put the inside pedal at 12 o'clock going through a turn.
Old article masking as a new one. Read it 2 years ago, wanted to comment on the ignorance of it, but comments on the page were closed or not allowed. Now it says "updated 2018" though I don't see much changes.
I think - this: "There are two types of e-bikes in the showroom – lightweight, bicycle-style machines and large "e-scooters" that look like Vespas made in a Chinese knock-off factory".There's also the entry "UPDATED MAY 12, 2018", but I don't see an "Update" section to the article. Were any updates made to the article itself?