Jeremy McCreary
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Carlsbad, CA
Thanks in advance for any help in resolving my chain length dilemma:
Go with (a) the seemingly successful length used by the LBS who put on my last SRAM EX1 e-MTB chain, or (b) the much longer chain implied by the SRAM instructions?
Bike is a 500W hub-drive with substantially lowered 1x gearing for my hilly terrain. Low gear is now 42/40 (back/front).
The LBS installed the current EX1 ~1,200 miles ago. Result: Derailleur arm at ~5 o'clock in low gear with excellent shifting performance with my Deore derailleur, Deore cassette, and narrow-wide chainring.
Due to my salty/sandy riding environment and, shall we say, less than stellar maintenance practices, that EX1 now needs to be replaced. Tooled up to do it myself with another EX1. (Retaining current cassette and chainring, as they show no significant wear.)
Plan A was to use the old length and resized the new EX1 accordingly. Then read the SRAM MTB chain instructions to look for gotchas. And lo and behold, SRAM seems to be implying a length at least 10 links longer!
How could that possibly be?? Any compelling reason to go with SRAM over previous success?
Go with (a) the seemingly successful length used by the LBS who put on my last SRAM EX1 e-MTB chain, or (b) the much longer chain implied by the SRAM instructions?
Bike is a 500W hub-drive with substantially lowered 1x gearing for my hilly terrain. Low gear is now 42/40 (back/front).
The LBS installed the current EX1 ~1,200 miles ago. Result: Derailleur arm at ~5 o'clock in low gear with excellent shifting performance with my Deore derailleur, Deore cassette, and narrow-wide chainring.
Due to my salty/sandy riding environment and, shall we say, less than stellar maintenance practices, that EX1 now needs to be replaced. Tooled up to do it myself with another EX1. (Retaining current cassette and chainring, as they show no significant wear.)
Plan A was to use the old length and resized the new EX1 accordingly. Then read the SRAM MTB chain instructions to look for gotchas. And lo and behold, SRAM seems to be implying a length at least 10 links longer!
How could that possibly be?? Any compelling reason to go with SRAM over previous success?
Last edited: