You must have gotten a bad unit or it was on you. I and others feel the tsdz2 performs as well as some big name assist mid drives (and there are plenty of reports of failures of the big name motors posted on this site alone). I have two, a 36v 500w version and a 48v 750w version with several hundred miles on each. My point of reference is a Yamaha PW-SE with which it compares very favorably. IMO the torque sensing function and assist is excellent, smooth and natural right out of the box very similar to the Yamaha. I live on a mountain and ride some pretty hilly routes, the motor housing has at worst been warm to the touch. It has never seemed to "overheat" even after pulling long steep grades (no warmer than the Yamaha) although there is no way I could ride "23mph" up the mountain I live on with either the Yamaha (which assists only to 20mph) or the Tongsheng bikes. I ride it like a bicycle, not a motorbike.
I've done "performance" modifications on motorcycles/scooters and ridden them in ways that they weren't designed for. If they failed I'd own it and not blame the original hardware which wasn't designed for what I did to it.
Too bad you threw yours away, a shame to put something in a land fill that someone might have been able to fix and put to use after maybe new bearings or axle and a new controller to get it back to the typical excellent performing stock configuration.
I never stated that I was riding 23mph uphill, I stated that it overheated going over 23mph period (note my use of 'or' instead of 'while'). Please dont cherry pick unrelated things in my posts to try to discredit me. The reason being that over 23mph (or so, the power being used which is displayed in real time by the opensource software was over 500w) at which point the motor would start warming up dramatically (the temp was also displayed in real time via the opensource software). This is expected due to the exponential power increases due to wind resistance. The tsdz2 although great for what it is is just too small for the power requirements of higher speed.
I ran my tsdz2 limited to 750w (max power limit independent of voltage is possible with the opensource software) so in fact it is equivalent to your 48v 750w version. It ran at 48v for most of its life till the 48v battery failed which was replaced with a 52v battery (limited to 750w)
So in reality the only 'performance mod' I made according to you was the opensource software. Please explain how that all my problems 'were on me'
I have also done performance mods on pretty much every vehicle I have ever owned including 10 years tracking highly modified cars. I have very realistic expectations and common mechanical sense.
I dont believe I have expressed anything in my post to imply that I had any 'stock warranty' expectations out of my tsdz2. I knew exactly what to expect as the slop issue I experienced was a 'very common issue' people were reporting on endless sphere. I spent months researching all the tsdz2 issues people were having and even wrote a spreadsheet outlining the problems and solutions and post numbers for future reference.
So you can blame it all 'on me' but in reality I am simply reporting common issues that you just choose to ignore. I most certainly agree I got a bad one. That shows QC issues people should consider.
Compared to my Brose ebikes, IMHO, the stock tsdz2 software torque response is horrible. Only did one ride before going with the opensource software which was a pretty dramatic improvement. I made attempts ('failures' as you describe) to make it better but in the end gave it up due to the horrible low pass filter design on the torque sensor output. I never felt it had much response for anything less that 1 crank revolution which seemed to coincide with a youtube video showing the delay in the low pass filter design. This low pass filter design is a hardware issue so it is present with the original software as well. Im guessing your just not as picky as me on torque sensor response. No problems if the response is ok with you but let others share their opinions as well.
Please point out where in my posts I describe using my tsdz2 as a motorbike instead of a bicycle?? I dont even have a throttle. Another silly attempt to discredit me. I can post ride data including human power outputs if you want to go further down this rabbit hole. I record all my rides on my garmin gps devices including wh/mile etc... Perhaps we can compare ride stats to see who is the real cyclist
I have no issues if you like it the way it is stock, more power to you but I do take issue with you saying any improvements over stock 'is not needed' or is 'a failure'. You simply have no experience to back up that claim. Please dont try to discredit people or downplay their experiences just because you disagree. These forums are for everyone to express their ideas/opinions and experiences and for us all to learn from all perspectives.
Sure all motors have issues, I never stated anything to the contrary. One of my Brose motors has bearing slop and has had it since about 2k miles but its pretty minimal and hasnt gotten worse. That motor has 8k miles on it now. I have a BBSHD with about 2500miles on it that has developed some clunking noises which I will likely have to addressed soon.
I am not a tsdz2 hater, I really wanted to like my tsdz2.
Pedaluma is a real fan of the tsdz2 at 36V and 350W. Perhaps that is where the tsdz2 is best suited. I have no issues with that although I have no use for one in that configuration. Most of my riding is at pretty low power levels...around 300watts, but usually the last leg home(when I am tired) is dealing with big headwinds(20mph+) which require alot more power where my current BBSHD and GMAC bikes excel.