It's been a couple days since I looked at this thread and wow there are some great responses here. Loving all this information from you folks.
This is another post that aligns pretty close with my experience. I think acceleration off the line is a big part of what I consider zippy and I just get that feeling more with the hub drives I've ridden than the mid drives.
Still I do wonder a lot about how much of a factor the controller programming is. I have yet to own a bike where I had access to re-program the motor response/output. I feel like I would really enjoy tinkering around with the programming to dial in the ride feeling I am looking for.
Yeah the first thing I noticed when I went to mid drives from geared hubs was the geared hub was a lot faster off the line, considering that you had to start from a lower gear to get the bike up and running. Starting from a lower gear, you lost time vs. the geared hub by the blips in acceleration that comes from rowing thru the gears. The mid drive doesn't become a performance leader until you mix hills in. Thats where it wins both for initial and sustained speed as well as longevity (mid drive will not fry/strip its poor little nylon internals).
On flat ground, nothing touches the acceleration on my 2wd geared hub commuter. That thing will make you giggle, and the way its geared, you still get a hard workout. But it lacks versatility which is the Achilles heel of hub motors. A mid will get you thru anything, everywhere.
This is another post that aligns pretty close with my experience. I think acceleration off the line is a big part of what I consider zippy and I just get that feeling more with the hub drives I've ridden than the mid drives.
Still I do wonder a lot about how much of a factor the controller programming is. I have yet to own a bike where I had access to re-program the motor response/output. I feel like I would really enjoy tinkering around with the programming to dial in the ride feeling I am looking for.