It also comes in handy when you have to walk the bike or put it on a rack.
Walking a bike...
I found my Radrunner clumsier to walk than a conventional bike. My Radmission was worse and my Abound worse yet. I often injured my right shin on a pedal or knocked the mirror out of alignment. After I shortened the bars on the Abound and the Radmission, they were as easy to walk as conventional bikes.
I see the problem now. I think the Radrunner bars were 600mm wide. To steer a bike as I walked, I had to reach across to the right grip. With the Radmission's 670mm bar, I'd sometimes stab my leg with the pedal as I walked while reaching across. The Abound's 720mm bars were worse. With 540mm bars, the reach is easy.
Bumps and wrists...
I usually take a right turn 100 yards from my house on bumpy, patched pavement. On my Abound, I'd slow down to spare my wrists. The sweep of your wide bars reminds me that two days after shortening the bars, I found myself charging into that corner, as I used to do with my Radrunner. That defies logic. The Radrunner had no suspension, and its wide tires were notoriously rough on bumps because they needed 30 psi.
The secret is what I discovered riding the Radrunner "no hands". Not fully trusting the bike, I'd ride without touching the grips but with thumbs and middle fingers making rings around them. When I hit bumps, the grips jerked primarily back, not up, relative to my hands. Pressure on pedals and seat helped me rise with the bike. That explains why the grips hardly seemed to rise. On a bump, some forward kinetic energy must be converted to upward kinetic energy, causing a spike of rearward acceleration (deceleration). That explains why the grips jumped back, along with the rest of the bike.
The suspension of the Abound would alleviate this. If only the mass of the wheel and fork had to accelerate up and over the bump, the deceleration of the bike would have been smaller. If the front wheel doesn't get you, watch out for the back. With no suspension, the back wheel would still cause a sharp spike of deceleration.
It seems a single bump would cause me to lurch forward twice on the Radrunner and only once on the Abound. Why could I handle bumps better on the Radrunner? I see now that it was because the bars were 600mm wide, vs 720 for the Abound. My forearms were better aligned with the lurching caused by bumps. When I shortened my Abound bar to 550mm, my wrists were cocked until I rotated the bars so that the grips sweep down more than back. With my forearms aligned with the direction of lurches, my wrists can handle bumps better. It's like the advice to keep your back vertical when lifting something heavy.