Explorer-1
Have bike, will travel
- Region
- USA
- City
- Boston North Shore
My feeling is all non qualified power rating should be nominal at 60% battery (because most people probably don't run their battery below 20%), and other ratings should be qualified with peak or what ever. The rating should be mechanical, not electrical power input. I appreciate you do your best in a crazy world.With the shark pack, you can get 120 seconds of 3000W . With the Xtour and UC Pro and the Titan pack, you can get substantially loger term 3000W performance.
I don't want to do do false advertising. The product achieves what is mentioned. We cannot defy laws of physics, and I don't want to claim it does. PLease let me know where you think we can word it better and I will make those changes.
You might also want to review your Q-Factor comments on your new cranks as well. I'm sure you said in 1 that you saved a mm, but they "might" be .1% that could benefit from 1mm or even detect it. So any benefits may be related to something else 1mm over the length of that crank I don't believe would change much either so not sure where the benefit would come from, maybe you mis-spoke on the difference? They look better though I'll admit though, I never tried them, and never did the calculations.
(ps. battery % is so bad of a metric though since often the system will already be limited to 80% true capacity and then the customer limits to 80% of that, and actual capacity is almost always over stated in e-bike/high-power applications)