stevenast
Well-Known Member
I'm really having trouble understanding how the lawmakers intend to restrict the use of the throttle from a technical perspective. What prevents a drive manufacturer from moving the throttle functionality to the pedals?
To illustrate that, let's imagine that we're a group of engineers and we introduce a new PAS mode called Hyper Turbo.
Here's how it might work:
- You start off by pedaling until you reach a desired cruising speed, and then you hit the Hyper Turbo button.
- Once Hyper Turbo is engaged, the bike maintains its speed as long as you keep on providing one pedal stroke stroke every 10 seconds.
- Each pedal stroke only requires 5 watts of input from the rider (or any other value he/she wishes). Anything else that's needed to maintain cruising speed will be provided by the drive.
- If you brake or stop pedaling for 10 seconds, Hyper Turbo will disengage.
- If you start up after a red light, Hyper Turbo can optionally and automatically re-engage to its previous value once a pre-determined speed has been reached.
So basically you've (more or less) provided the same type of functionality as a throttle, but as you're still required to apply pressure with your feet it falls into the category of a pedal assist.
What finer details am I missing here?
To answer your question: what you're missing is that subverting the spirit (or letter) of the law leads to even stricter legislation, and also no reputable company is going to go around the regulations like that.
My opinion is that the electric bike community should be thinking about what millions of pedestrians will be willing to tolerate on the paths they use and pay taxes to build and maintain.
Those same millions have needs and desires that will be addressed by legislators that they elect. They will regulate the use of electric bikes on paths ...and the voice of e-bike riders will be given the weight that it deserves in their decisions.
Last edited: