The pedestrian does not get hurt because the bike running them over at 30 mph has no throttle. Ok then.Answer: They are not using a throttle.
The pedestrian does not get hurt because the bike running them over at 30 mph has no throttle. Ok then.Answer: They are not using a throttle.
Are we talking about transubstantiation now...?When does an e-bike become a motorcycle, in the mind of the public?
Who're ya calling an idiot? Don't you know that it's absolutely no problem doing that as long as the bike doesn't have even the tiniest motor, or (THE HORROR!) a throttle!Who is the idiot bike rider doing 30 on a shared path?
Im calling the idiot bike rider an idiot obviously for endangering pedestriansWho're ya calling an idiot? Don't you know that it's absolutely no problem doing that as long as the bike doesn't have even the tiniest motor, or (THE HORROR!) a throttle!
You obviously don't at all get the point with these new laws which is that only e-bikes are dangerous to pedestrians, not motorless bikes.Im calling the idiot bike rider an idiot obviously for endangering pedestrians
You obviously don't at all get the point with these new laws which is that only e-bikes are dangerous to pedestrians, not motorless bikes.
You forgot, they are quantitatively less dangerous if they are a pedelec!
Pedestrians. Children. Elderly. E-bikes share paths with them. Making new laws to regulate this growing product category is a proactive, progressive approach to public safety.
As e-bike riders, most of us would probably prefer less regulation. I'm pretty sure the general public does not agree.
Get off your fear mongering high horse Dr. Phil.
OK.You are simply playing into the hands of e-bike retailers who would love nothing more than to legislate DIY kits out of existence and force us all to buy crappy pre-made bikes like the one you bought.
It's all well and good that YOU chose to pay a premium for a very limited and government restricted pre-built bike. But by doing so you have limited your choices. And that's fine if that's what you choose to do. Why are you so invested in limiting OTHER people's choices?
Getting back on topic, when do you think an electric bike becomes an electric motorcycle?
I'm fairly certain that's what @bareyb meant. An electric bike designed to meet the MC standards will never be a bicycle and a bicycle with electric power designed to be used at bicycle speeds and power will never be a MC.Actually, that is not quite true... if you have a totally unrestricted 'ebike' or kit that is doing 30+ mph then it is legally considered moped/motorcycle class in Texas and many other states and requires registration, licensing and insurance. Thus is not allowed on trails with bikes. The whole argument of throttle or no throttle is ridiculous-the ebike rider is going to be pedaling on the trail to some extent whether they have pedal assist or throttle. I guarantee you we all have fought like crazy to keep city park trails and hike & bike paths open to ebikes that are not motorcycles since we all share the trails here. This is with the support of our local cycling advocacy group, Texas Bike Coalition. This is not about limiting the diy kits, but if your so called ebike does 40 or 50mph then why put pedestrians, cyclists and e-cyclists at risk. The whole idea here about sharing the bike paths and trails was that all users would be able to interact in a reasonably safe way.
I would prefer the people work on and pass regulations over the manufactures and industry groups proposing them. Slippery slope!I'm grateful the bicycle manufacturers are working on regulations that will benefit the majority of us!
I would prefer the people work on and pass regulations over the manufactures and industry groups proposing them. Slippery slope!