Although I am not the type to reply to my own post here I am doing just that. Please forgive me.
This is a 1974 handmade bike from England. I just made it. It still has the original Campi rear hub. Now it is electric. The battery sits in the water bottle cage. The motor is between the pedals. That is re-cycling.
You know what that reminds me of? Before I got my early '70s Raleigh Competition, I had a 3-speed internal gear Raleigh that was made out of Reynolds 531-- it was a touring bike with straighter handlebars than that, but the way the rear tubes-- whatever that's called-- are flared and connect with the down tube, the thinness of the tubes, and the detail where they are welded-- it's not identical, but similar.
The gradual curve of the front fork-- lacking the distinct but soft angle of, say, a Peugeot UO8 or PX10-- reminds me of the Competition. That was a very unusual design at the time, meant to absorb a bit more bumps. This is why, I think, the Competition was regarded as a high-end touring bike, and not a racing bike.
Of course, I wanted a 10-speed like my friends, so the bike shop modded it with dropped handlebars and an Camp rear derailleur-- 9 speeds, three internal (coast to shift) and three external (pedal to shift.) My very (VERY) wealthy friend insisted I lock it in his basement after a long trip, I refused, he insisted, and said, "It won't get stolen, I'll pay for it if it does."
Well, it was 1970s New York, so it got stolen. He paid for it-- was as good as his word-- we were probably 12 or 13 years old, and we are still friends to this day.
That is stunning, I do wonder how much it weighs... I'm sure it's a rocket on pavement, but probably skittish as a colt on cracks, dirt, rocks, etc.
I'm going to be on the Competition in NYC in a month or so, so I'm riding the Trek a bit more to get used to having minimal suspension-- and it's a good thing to do, because I'm so used to the Moto that I'm hitting cracks and bumps pretty hard, so I've got to lose those full-suspension habits!