MarcD
Active Member
If you want to actually calculate some scenarios you can here: http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
I've posted this before, and it is useful. For example, a 5'10", 180 lb rider on a MTB requires about 89 watts to maintain 12.5 mph on flat. The same rider requires 556 watts to maintain 25 mph. So 2x mph requires 6.2x the energy using this model.
To travel at 35mph requires 1,451 watts. Given that a fit, amateur cyclist can usually sustain about 125 watts or 150 watts, a 1,000 watt motor isn't going to cut it.
More importantly, a 25 mile range would require the following: 25 miles / 35 mph = .714 hours of run time. .714 hours x 1326 watts = 946 watt hours. 946 watt hours is a 20 amp hr battery at 48 volts. A huge battery. And this doesn't allow for motor and drivetrain inefficiencies.
Just something to consider.
Marc
I've posted this before, and it is useful. For example, a 5'10", 180 lb rider on a MTB requires about 89 watts to maintain 12.5 mph on flat. The same rider requires 556 watts to maintain 25 mph. So 2x mph requires 6.2x the energy using this model.
To travel at 35mph requires 1,451 watts. Given that a fit, amateur cyclist can usually sustain about 125 watts or 150 watts, a 1,000 watt motor isn't going to cut it.
More importantly, a 25 mile range would require the following: 25 miles / 35 mph = .714 hours of run time. .714 hours x 1326 watts = 946 watt hours. 946 watt hours is a 20 amp hr battery at 48 volts. A huge battery. And this doesn't allow for motor and drivetrain inefficiencies.
Just something to consider.
Marc