A correction on this: I see now that it comes with the Future Shock feature that they've been using on some of their road bikes. In most cases, this would smooth things out sufficiently on rough roads. It's not equivalent to the forks on a MTB, but neither is the regular Vado fork.2) The solid fork would put me out of the market for it. I expect my Vado 4.0 to be an all-road bike with some trips on smooth-to-rough unpaved roads and other roads where I'd like the softer fork. I do take my solid-framed Felt on some of those same roads, but then again it's a carbon frame made to allow some flex in the right places.
Is future shock on all SL Vados or just the top end?A correction on this: I see now that it comes with the Future Shock feature that they've been using on some of their road bikes. In most cases, this would smooth things out sufficiently on rough roads. It's not equivalent to the forks on a MTB, but neither is the regular Vado fork.
Just the 5.0 models.Is future shock on all SL Vados or just the top end?
As I said before, the buyers for the SL can be easily found. I am overly critical, true. I still believe the full Vado (Class 3) is the king of the class. OK, Allant+ 9.9S is the strong competitor. I might even add that dual-battery Class 1 R&M bikes are long range runners, even though the Homage 2 x 500 W ridden by an experienced user reaches 150 but not 160 km (I have asked the rider).
Only don't tell me a pannier-loaded SL rider will make 100 miles on the small battery + the extender.
Not sure about 100 miles, but I rode the same route this week (different days) on both a Creo SL Carbon Comp Evo and a Trek Allant 8S. Limitations in a direct compare since there are different assist levels, and other variables. The route: 15 miles up Big Cottonwood Canyon in Utah, 4500 ft elevation gain. I live at 9000ft altitude near the top of the canyon and did not use assist on trip down. My energy effort was about the same for each ride. For the Allant with the Bosch Gen 4 motor, I was in level 2 of 4 (Tour) throughout the ride except for about 3 miles of the route where I went to Level 3 of 4 (sport) for some of the steeper sections. I used 67% of the 625 Watt battery. For the Creo, I was in level 2 of 3 for the route except for level 3 for about 3 miles. I had the range extender battery and used 48% of the main 320 watt battery and 48% of the 160 watt range extender battery. I also completed the uphill ride 25 minutes faster with the Creo.
My impression is that a lighter bike with narrower tires despite the smaller battery could likely compete in range with the heavier bigger battery bikes. The range extender may be a great item to get and my dealer gave me a $200 discount of the RE battery ($250 vs $450) when I bought the bike. I really like the Creo think the Vado SL will be a terrific bike. With the 55lb Allant, it is hard to get up stairs (5 steps on my porch) and on a bike rack. Also the heavier bike is far less nimble.
Just the 5.0 models.
Trying to post a link to a Bloomberg article about e-bike sales and Specialized offerings:
I was the same way with cars, through my car-crazy years. Now it's ebikes.Maybe it’s not just this thread, but the whole forum.
It’s possible that like kids we all have a bad influence on each other.
“And remember, son, don’t you go hanging out with those EBR people.”
Saw a new Vado SL on a trail near Sacramento, CA today. Very sleek and hard to tell it's an ebike as it goes by. The motor noise was louder than I expected...Great article, thanks for sharing. Very interesting reading about the drive system design and testing based on rider feedback from the Turbo S.
View attachment 52485
Light and inexpensive were the goals. Sacrifices may have been made toward that end.Saw a new Vado SL on a trail near Sacramento, CA today. Very sleek and hard to tell it's an ebike as it goes by. The motor noise was louder than I expected...
I suppose. Perhaps I'm just accustomed to the quite 'whirr' of my Vado 5 mid-drive.Light and inexpensive were the goals. Sacrifices may have been made toward that end.
That's a pretty pricey 'click'...Leica M10-D , Body US $8,795.00 , Lens Additional
Digital Body. Analog Soul.
https://us.leica-camera.com/Photography/Leica-M/Leica-M10-D
View attachment 52528
4.5 out of 5 dentists prefer Leicas if they dabble in photography.Leica M10-D , Body US $8,795.00 , Lens Additional
Digital Body. Analog Soul.
https://us.leica-camera.com/Photography/Leica-M/Leica-M10-D
View attachment 52528