FTC Complaint
Active Member
Basically, we knew the "charge time," "charger amperage," "range," and ... other advertising claims were materially false. Storm is NOW selling some of these changes as "design upgrades" when in fact they were obvious to anyone with knowledge about this product from the get-go.
What is interesting now is that production might be complete before the next court date, so some of the risks are being shifted from the consumer to Agency 2.0!
The costs of false claims, omissions in testing, skirting regulatory compliance, omitting warranty, not having post sales support, destructive testing the battery assembly, HAZMAT testing on the battery, skirting the CPSC process, not having the depth to recall the product, skirting import process are still borne by the consumer.
Is bad business illegal? No, it is just bad business. Or when push comes to shove, would a court call any of this conduct fraud?
What is interesting now is that production might be complete before the next court date, so some of the risks are being shifted from the consumer to Agency 2.0!
The costs of false claims, omissions in testing, skirting regulatory compliance, omitting warranty, not having post sales support, destructive testing the battery assembly, HAZMAT testing on the battery, skirting the CPSC process, not having the depth to recall the product, skirting import process are still borne by the consumer.
Is bad business illegal? No, it is just bad business. Or when push comes to shove, would a court call any of this conduct fraud?