I do not think that is true. Last the founders heard a couple places were “competing”, but none were in the US. I asked a couple times if either of them had any bike experience, but it was right as the whole process was falling apart and most questions went unanswered.My understanding is the new frame is US made to avoid repeat of the previous problem...
I suspect the frames could be made in the US, but the cost would be higher. Last I heard the two locations Pushkar was considering was India and Mexico.The old Helios design was a WW design as well. I love the sound of a made in USA carbon frame, but it sadly sounds like the manufacturing capabilities just aren’t up to it here.
Life keeps disrupting my plans to get over to Watt Wagans. I’ll have my time back to myself in a couple of days and hope to get there. I’ll share what I learn then.I'm anxiously waiting for your report Billy, it has been a week.
Just wondering. Will the new WW Leo be Carbon Fiber or Titanium?Awesome thanks for the reply.
I'm wondering if the new Helios will be the platform for the WW LEO (Law Enforcement Officer) Ebikes.
Note if there are some Leo ebikes at their headquarters.
We are still in frame testing phase. I would say late spring based on initial testing.Pushkar
With the new Helios designs is there a general time estimate?
Yes, very similar.will they utilize the same components?
Yes, 52V, 21Ah. 21700cellsmore battery capacity?
Yes. For those who have existing orders will be at the top of the list.Will people who’ve been on the list well over a year be able to swap over to a hydra In an expedient manner?
Thanks
We will be using Samsung 50E cells.. so should be max capacity.Note the use of 21700 cells instead of 1850s. This is nice! The 18650 is 18 mm diameter x 65 mm length. 21700 is 21 mm x 70 mm. Doesn't sound like a big difference, but in volume the 21700 is almost 50% larger (47%, to be exact). The 18650 typically has about 2.0 to 3.5 Ah in each cell, depending upon quality. The 21700 starts at 3.0 Ah and can go to 5.0 Ah.
Comparative sizes:
This requires a new frame design, with one big honking downtube, but the result should be spectacular. There are other advantages in that there are fewer cells per unit of power, so simpler battery management and fewer connections to fail.
Check out the relative watt hours you can get from them at certain current draws and how much voltage sag you get with the 50E's under load. Mooch does great battery benchmarks complete with discharge voltage graphs at various discharge rates, as well as cell temperature taken - very easy to find his benchmark results online! You'll probably want a lower discharge rate on the BMS & 1500W max limit on the controller for the 50E's, or look into Molicel P42A or Lishen LR-2170-SF. The Molicels are 40T killers for high output and the Lishens will deliver more energy than the 50E's at 10A, with lower self heating.We will be using Samsung 50E cells.. so should be max capacity.
14s4p with 21700 is around 21ah.Check out the relative watt hours you can get from them at certain current draws and how much voltage sag you get with the 50E's under load. Mooch does great battery benchmarks complete with discharge voltage graphs at various discharge rates, as well as cell temperature taken - very easy to find his benchmark results online! You'll probably want a lower discharge rate on the BMS & 1500W max limit on the controller for the 50E's, or look into Molicel P42A or Lishen LR-2170-SF. The Molicels are 40T killers for high output and the Lishens will deliver more energy than the 50E's at 10A, with lower self heating.
Sounds like you're doing 14s7p in the packs if 21Ah is the capacity for 80-20% charge in which case probably not as big of an ask for the 50E's and my previous point may be moot
yes. all of them.Pushkar quick question. Does WW bikes have serial numbers?
Probably can't support it with a CF frame. I agree though, would have much preferred an unsprung rack, won't be a true R&M slayer would it.Is this still in early stage?
I would remove the rear rack out off the swing arm and relocated to frame to avoid unsprung mass.
This is why motorcycle companies never attach anything on swingarm to avoid instability.
Riese & Muller attached the rear rack directly on to the frame keep the bike stable on bumps.
True. Hard to do on CF.Probably can't support it with a CF frame. I agree though, would have much preferred an unsprung rack, won't be a true R&M slayer would it.