m@Robertson
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
Holy crap small world! Right on!you know I have been wondering for a few months if you were the same MRobertson from LXF. and now it is confirmed. I am Mr. Incredible from LXF.
Holy crap small world! Right on!you know I have been wondering for a few months if you were the same MRobertson from LXF. and now it is confirmed. I am Mr. Incredible from LXF.
In Texas a VJ is subject to regulation and the air is private property. In California it is the other way around.In Texas they can just shoot the chasers and claim stand your ground !
That's really well said, I love that! Thanks for sharing. Story to illustrate: I was passed by a nice group of folks who appeared to be snowbirds on the Greenbelt today on e-bikes while I was on my lunch walk and they couldn't have been nicer waving and smiling and ringing their bells and saying on your left and riding at safe comfortable speeds. Perfect example of existing in harmony! No chance I would want them riding on the streets in bike lanes out here in Scottsdale.Great debate subject, I'm in!
I am all for restricting paths, trails, etc. to particular modes of transportation; examples include, but are not limited to pedestrians, horses, bicycles (including eBikes), motorcycles, quads, 4x4, etc. Restricting what mode of transportation is allowed protects the safety of all users and the integrity of the trail, path, passageway, etc.
However, I am very much against breaking down the category of 'bicycle' into sub categories. A rider on a bicycle is every bit as capable of being a jerk and endangering the safety of others as a rider on an eBike. Allowing analog bicyclist to a designated area and banning eBicyclist does not inherently reduce speed or increase safety. Same thing goes for further subdividing eBikes into Classes.
We don't limit what cars can drive on roads, streets or highways based on the horsepower of the car, we establish rules of the road and speed limits.
I hope you can do better than that. Most drivers confuse "rules of the road" with local driving habits that are not actually legal. "I obey traffic laws" usually includes exceptions like speed limits, close passes, stop signs, turn signals, right turn on red without stopping or even slowing down, abrupt lane changes and ignoring control signs. We have a version of the Idaho stop law for bicycles that allows a bicycle to treat a stop sign like a yield sign. I joke that it's the same thing cars do except it's legal for bikes.When riding on the roadways I obey traffic laws and signs as if I were driving my pickup truck.
I agree. E-bike classes are useful for sales but are meaningless in the context of riding on most MUPs. Assuming pedal assist and no throttles on class 3 bikes and only ebikes that meet the US definition of no more that 750 watt motors, it takes quite a bit of effort to ride, pedal assisted, at 28 mph, let alone faster. On flat paths.SPEED LIMITS NOT CLASS LIMITS
Class 3 owner using common sense when riding.
...
Personally, I think speed limits on MUPs, rail trails and so forth are appropriate, assuming limits and monitoring are for flats. Getting a speeding ticket for going downhill too fast would be ridiculous.
I chose a class 3 bike for riding on streets where I often ride as fast as I can as self defense. I don’t want to piss off too any drivers. On my local rail trail I usually ride at between 12 and 16 mph. Most of my analog cycling friends are comfortable in that range as are the majority of athletic riders. There are also many riders more comfortable at 8-10 mph. Young Uber-healthy road bike riders are often at 20+, frequently riding in pelotons. And folks pulling kids (and dogs) in trailers. And folks walking dogs on too long leashes. And folks on horseback. A 20 or 25 MPH speed limit on this trail would be a good thing. Depending on traffic and other conditions, that might be too fast, but slower limits would be completely ignored if traffic is light. Just like cars.
Enforcement would probably be impossible. I’ve seen the a bicycle riding cop once or twice. Mostly closer to the big city start of the trail. It‘s unlikely they were there for enforcement. More likely they use the trail as a shortcut to other community destinations. (The trail is often a shorter distance than the roads. Especially for cyclists.) There are trail watchers, but they’re volunteers whose mission is to help folks not to police them. Even my wealthy suburban region would have a problem funding speed limit enforcement officers.
“it's just the price we pay to share each other's infrastructure.”i agree with this; there is a wide range of speeds on the flat MUPs around here from strollers to pelotons. a fit rider can do 20+ on their acoustic road bike, as could a class 3 e-bike. the speed limit on the longest, busiest MUP i use (i avoid them whenever possible!) is 15mph, which seems reasonable to me if a little frustrating if there's a big tailwind. if there's a big tailwind, i'll readily admit to going 23-24mph, motor off, IF there's nobody in front of me. the trail is dead flat and straight with few if any intersections or reasons/opportunities to stop to the side.
i know several people who have gotten speeding tickets on bikes on this trail and a few nearby local streets, so while such enforcement seems quite misguided to me (how many cars were speeding at that time.....) it is completely possible.
i don't think the presence of speed limits should mean anything (regardless of weight or power) should classify as a bike - the two are separate issues, IMO. the same exists in the motor vehicle space where there are safety constraints on vehicle design as well as limits on the use of public resources like roadways. it's just the price we pay to share each other's infrastructure...
right ?!?!?“it's just the price we pay to share each other's infrastructure.”
Wait. The roads and bike trails and so forth weren‘t build just for me? !!!
Shocking!