US National Park Service Announces Policy for Electric Bicycle Use in National Parks

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Hi guys! My friend works for a national park and just sent me this! It's a press release from today, August 30th 2019 :D

Use of e-bikes will increase access to recreational opportunities in parks

WASHINGTON - On August 30, the National Park Service announced a new electric bicycle (e-bike) policy for national parks, expanding recreational opportunities and accessibility. The policy supports Secretary’s Order 3376, signed by U.S. Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt on August 29, that directs Department of the Interior (DOI) bureaus to create a clear and consistent e-bike policy on all federal lands managed by the Department. The policy also supports Secretary’s Order 3366 to increase recreational opportunities on public lands.
A majority of states have adopted e-bike policies, most following model legislation that allows for the 3 classes of e-bikes to have access to bicycle trails. The NPS e-bike policy seeks to provide some consistency with the state rules applying where park units are located.

“As more Americans are using e-bikes to enjoy the great outdoors, national parks should be responsive to visitors’ interest in using this new technology wherever it is safe and appropriate to do so,” said National Park Service Deputy Director P. Daniel Smith. “They make bicycle travel easier and more efficient, and they provide an option for people who want to ride a bicycle but might not otherwise do so because of physical fitness, age, disability, or convenience, especially at high altitudes or in hilly or strenuous terrain.”

This new policy will enable visitors to use e-bikes, low-speed electric bicycles with power assistance, in the same manner as traditional bicycles, allowing them on park roads, paved or hardened trails, areas designated for off-road motor vehicle use and administrative roads. The operator of an e-bike may only use the motor to assist pedal propulsion. The motor may not be used to propel an e-bike without the rider also pedaling, except in locations open to public motor vehicle traffic.

Similar to traditional bicycles, e-bikes are not allowed in designated wilderness areas. Park superintendents will retain the right to limit, restrict, or impose conditions of bicycle use and e-bike use in order to ensure visitor safety and resource protection. Over the coming month, superintendents will work with their local communities, staff, and partners to determine best practices and guidance for e-bike use in their parks. Visitors should check the website of the park they plan to visit for details about where e-bikes are permitted and any other considerations specific to that park.

E-bikes make bicycle travel easier and more efficient, because they allow bicyclists to travel farther with less effort. When used as an alternative to gasoline- or diesel-powered modes of transportation, e-bikes can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel consumption, improve air quality, and support active modes of transportation for park staff and visitors. Similar to traditional bicycles, e-bikes can decrease traffic congestion, reduce the demand for vehicle parking spaces, and increase the number and visibility of cyclists on the road.

A copy of the National Park Service’s new e-bike policy is available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/policy/upload/PM_19-01.pdf.

About the National Park Service. More than 20,000 National Park Service employees care for America’s 419 national parks and work with communities across the nation to help preserve local history and create close-to-home recreational opportunities. Learn more at www.nps.gov, and on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.
 
Great news! However from the news and chatter, the forces of reaction and entitlement are mobilizing for public hearings to reverse this policy. Therefore, I propose the following:

Mass emails in support to the Secretary;

First ebike person of the year award, which if won by the Secretary, might stiffen his resolve.

I would be happy to help draft form emails if anyone knows a format which members can edit and use.
 
National Park Service policy would permit Class 1-3, but no throttle riding, obey same trail speed limit as for pedal bicycles.
 
Last edited:
One needs to be careful not to read too much or too little into this announcement.

This only is relevant on trails open to bicycles, which in western National Parks is a tiny minority of the total miles of trails that exist. And as the policy states, no trail in designated wilderness (which in typical National Parks over 95 percent of their area is designated wilderness) is open to bicycles, electric or acoustic.

Probably, for me at least, the more relevant aspect of this rule change is that a lot of roads that are closed to motor vehicles in shoulder seasons will be open to e-bikes.
 
Last edited:
One needs to be careful not to read too much or too little into this announcement.

This only is relevant on trails open to bicycles, which in western National Parks is a tiny minority of the total miles of trails that exist. And as the policy states, no trail in designated wilderness (which in typical National Parks over 95 percent of their area is designated wilderness) is open to bicycles, electric or acoustic.

Probably, for me at least, the more relevant aspect of this rule change is that a lot of roads that are closed to motor vehicles in shoulder seasons will be open to e-bikes.

Did not know that, thanks for posting the situation. But here in DC this is great news for commuters as the National Park Service operates arterial bicycle trails including the Mt Vernon, Capital Crescent, and C&O trails, & Memorial Bridge, all previously had an ebike ban.
 
Last edited:
This is indeed welcome news! It should be noted however that the ban was lifted by a presidential order. It could easily be re instated, especially if environmentalists exert enough pressure on a more eco friendly administration.

It really amazes me how many e-bike misnomers are out there, especially among politicians and lawmakers. I ride a lot of trails and talk to a good many fellow cyclists. I try to engage the anti ebike riders to find out their objections. Most are of the opinion that an ebike will ruin the trail surface like a gasoline powered dirt bike and run people off the trail at high speed. I explain that a class 1,2 or 3 ebike won't "burn rubber" or do a wheel stand. It doesn't create any more wheel spin or go any faster than an athlete on a conventional bike.

Unfortunately, most of my words are wasted on these conventional cyclists. Deep inside, I think they feel insulted by a less fit older person on an ebike being able to meet or exceed their performance on a conventional bike.

Of course these are just my observations. I wish however there was a way to educate our lawmakers on just what an e-bike really is instead of listening to lobbyists for conventional cycling organizations.
 
This is indeed welcome news! It should be noted however that the ban was lifted by a presidential order. It could easily be re instated, especially if environmentalists exert enough pressure on a more eco friendly administration...I wish however there was a way to educate our lawmakers on just what an e-bike really is instead of listening to lobbyists for conventional cycling organizations.

I agree the manner in which this was enacted will be seen as an imposition by some, especially given the letter sent by a large number of wilderness and outdoor organizations opposing lifting the ban. But I didn’t see too many cycling organizations or rail-to-trail organizations signed up, just the mtb crowd who want to protect their hard won access to land and volunteer work building bicycle trails and believe emtbs pose some sort of threat. Here in DC the cycling organization WABA has a pro-ebike position so would presumably oppose a future attempt to reimpose a national ebike trail ban. Frankly a national ban was long overdue for revision given the need to recognize wilderness and urban areas have different needs, the daily reality of ebike commuters on arterial commuting trails, promote regular folk switching out of cars to cargo ebikes - a lot of parents feel safer carting their children on bicycle paths rather than on streets, and the latent demand for ebike access to long distance rail-trails operated by NPS like the C&O canal/GAP trail route from DC to Pittsburgh - there have been a number of organized ebike tours along that route and while they were legal on the GAP portion, they were banned on the C&O portion, which made no sense. It is a win for cycling as a whole in that it increases the number of people demanding better cycling infrastructure.
 
Last edited:
The news is certainly making the rounds. I'm not surprised. Pinkbike is usually not in favor of eMTB, their writers aren't usually militant about it though. The comments are a different story.

It's interesting to note, according to Pinkbike the new policy opens up about 75% of federally controlled land. Comments after the article aren't from a happy lot, but apparently they hate horseback riders way more than ebikers. Way more!

 
Here's hoping it all goes smoothly, and eMTBs become commonplace on public trails with no increase in conflicts etc.

Then all the noise will dissipate, mountain bike advocacy will proliferate, and all the naysayers will cease to pontificate. 🧐🤪
 
Curious how this welcome new permission is applied in New York state which currently does not permit ebikes and the governor refuses to sign the ebike legislation that passed the state assembly this year. Is this a case where federal land use regulations over-ride state law in National Parks? A report on federal vs state land usage law by the Congressional Research Service suggests both Congress and federal regulations have supremacy over state law on federal land, this ought to mean ebikes are now permitted in National Parks in New York State with the exception of most of the National Heritage Areas where the land is not owned by the federal government, Source: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44267.pdf
 
Last edited:
Poor job/slanted LA paper on topic
Only because trump knew nothing about it. He's too busy trying to sell public land to corporate interests.
If he has his way Bears Ears will be as pock marked with gas wells as the Southern Ute Rez!
I worked the oil patch some when I was young. I can tell you the stuff they pump down the wells does
not improve groundwater quality
 
Last edited:
One needs to be careful not to read too much or too little into this announcement.

This only is relevant on trails open to bicycles, which in western National Parks is a tiny minority of the total miles of trails that exist. And as the policy states, no trail in designated wilderness (which in typical National Parks over 95 percent of their area is designated wilderness) is open to bicycles, electric or acoustic.

Probably, for me at least, the more relevant aspect of this rule change is that a lot of roads that are closed to motor vehicles in shoulder seasons will be open to e-bikes.
Ya know, Coffee, I'm kinda okay with that for the most part. The last thing I need to see when hiking up a wilderness
trail is some suicidal down-hiller coming at me doing 30 mph. I love riding trails at limited velocity, but I've long
since filled my quota of broken bones. I was Mtn biking on a fenderless old Monarch with 3" tires & a springer fork
back in the late '50s on Pike's Peak's Barr Trail. I grew up in the foothills of that peak; that & the Garden of the Gods
was my backyard. You couldn't ask for a better childhood.
 
I'm a little confused. Did they change anything since August 2019 or are they just inviting public feedback on those revised regs?
 
For any of us who ride, or wish to ride e-bikes in National Parks, THIS IS OUR OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS OUR OPINION!

From the comments I've reviewed so far, the trend is NOT going in our favor! Let's not waste this chance to voice our opinion!

My thanks to Dewey for spotting and posting this. IMO, it is important enough to warrant it's own separate thread.

Here is a direct link to the comment page: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NPS_FRDOC_0001-0136

Read the instructions first, then click on the blue oval that says "comment" in the upper right of the page. By all means, VOICE YOUR OPINION!!
 
Back