No doubt they have a long venereal history.The Guardian has a long and venerable history
Me and anyone who wants to try to defend the article!"We can illustrate how they attempt to decieve their audience point by point if anyone here actually believes The Guardian and wants to take their side."
Who is "we"?
Are you thereby not in agreement that the COP result is bought and paid for?I don't have much knowledge about the Guardian, but just read the ads.
The same companies that paid for those ads had more paid lobbyists at COP than any of the pacific island countries, and they brought lots of money, unlike countries like say, India that just came looking for money.
Let's review the article ad by ad and claim by claim, as you understand the claims, then.The Guardian has a long and venerable history
So your opinion vs someone else's opinion which is fine but proves nothing.Me and anyone who wants to try to defend the article!
Does this mean you know the article has no factual basis?So your opinion vs someone else's opinion which is fine but proves nothing.
Our major highways are still blocked. One going to the interior is just gone in sections.There is no rail access to Canada’s biggest port after days of torrential rain and landslides.
"Stewart, B.C. has recently received heavy snowfalls and will receive another generous accumulation. This will melt as the rain system arrives and drainage systems could be blocked or overwhelmed. Localized or perhaps widespread flooding could result."Storms at Port of Vancouver Leave Grain Stuck in Prairies | Transport Topics
Mountains of wheat and canola are stranded in Canada after storms blocked access to the Port of Vancouver during peak shipping season.www.ttnews.com
View attachment 107294View attachment 107295View attachment 107296
Cognitive dissonance, denial with what is happening right now.
No and neither do you.Does this mean you know the article has no factual basis?
Then why do you think that examination of the claims for basis in fact could only yield opinion?No and neither do you.
There is an error in your mind-reading of "just to provoke". Why aren't any articles and remarks posted that confirm and conform to your beliefs also done "just to provoke"? See what I mean? Why is it a one-way street for you?Not interested in being sucked into someone's personal debating club. I value when someone brings a different perspective than most, but challenging just to provoke adds nothing and is frankly disrespectful to the OP and subject at hand.
Of course "this" is happening. What the cause of "this", though, is a matter of opinion. Experts can tell you but you need to listen with your ears properly and read your evidence properly; it is their considered opinion. But you can call them out for that if it's not to your satisfaction.This is happening! This is not a matter of rhetoric or opinion.
The very biggest shipping days of the year have been totally shut down for all of Western Canada. Farmers in Saskatchewan cannot get food to market. Little kid's will get coal for Christmas because their toys are stuck at the port. This is because of Climate Change caused by humans.
What has to happen before you will admit reality. A 16C day during this coming January in Saskatchewan? Would that do the trick?
Yeah, but only by 97% of them.Of course "this" is happening. What the cause of "this", though, is a matter of opinion. Experts can tell you but you need to listen with your ears properly and read your evidence properly; it is their considered opinion. But you can call them out for that if it's not to your satisfaction.
Yeah, but only by 97% of them.
That's nonsense. I've already shown a fine detail examination of the consensus claim and how they cheated. They claimed to have been surveying % of climate science papers that agreed that humans are the cause of over 50% of the warming since 1950. They cheated by secretly changing the meaning of "AGW" that they claim they are using, from causing over half of warming, to "humans contribute".Yeah, but only by 97% of them.
So should we debate weather or not the moon is made out of green cheese because it is 'opinion'? This is established. It is time to move ahead and fight climate change. The days for Chamberlain's are over. The days for Churchill's are here.Yeah, but only by 97% of them.
What has to happen before you will admit reality. A 16C day during this coming January in Saskatchewan? Would that do the trick?