Specialized Turbo Vado SL: An Incredible E-Bike (User Club)

Ah thanks Stefan, informative as always.

Is 35/35 the most quiet setting? or is there a tweak here I can do?
I find eco louder then Sport or Turbo - on hills anyway. I put it down to the restricted (and small) motor having to work harder so it has a higher pitch, sounding quite shrill. When the road rises further and I hit Sport the note is lower.
 
I've tried tons of settings. For me... I use Eco 35/35 when I'm trying to conserve power and am going on a longer ride where I'm not sure if I'll have enough battery. I really want to use sport as the mode I'm using when I'm just riding and not thinking about things and I know I have plenty of battery for the ride. I've tried Sport at 50/50, 55/55, 60/60, and 65/65. I've also tried 30/100, 50/100, 55/100, 60/100, 65/100. Using the /100 settings feels to me like I'm pushing myself but also getting assistance when I need it up hills. 55/55 and others like this, helps, but I'm not getting enough assistance on the hills. Sometimes on steeper hills I want to switch to Turbo.

30/100 doesn't really help that much on the hills, because I'm not able to output enough power to have the motor help me as much. I might as well be on regular ECO with a little more help.

50-65/100 seems to be the most comfortable. I can go fast 15mph+ average. I get a good heart rate. I don't feel like I'm killing myself on hills. Right now I have it set at 60/100, but might go down to 50 or 55. When I tried it last time at those rates, I felt like I was tiring out more quickly on the hills.
 
@mogulman: If I may suggest something, please do not try anything above 60% as the basic Assist (Ease) for long rides. Above, the battery goes off the cliff. I'd say, 50 or 55% are safe numbers.
Interesting. Why would there be such a strong rise in battery drain rate above ease E = 60? Motor power (Pm) is either linear or flat in E in steady riding, and the drain rate is roughly proportional to (Pm / e), where e is the motor's electromechanical efficiency.

Hopefully, the efficiency doesn't fall off a cliff at E > 60. And if it does, how come?
 
Interesting. Why would there be such a strong rise in battery drain rate above ease E = 60? Motor power (Pm) is either linear or flat in E in steady riding, and the drain rate is roughly proportional to (Pm / e), where e is the motor's electromechanical efficiency.

Hopefully, the efficiency doesn't fall off a cliff at E > 60. And if it does, how come?
Jeremy, I don't know why and even do not try to guess. What I say is experience based. There was a time I actively measured the Vado SL range at different assistance levels, and it was usually at E=M. (Bear in mind I own as many as 4 Range Extenders and never hesitate to use them, haha!) I even made some graphs that I posted on this forum but we won't find them.

My basic assistance for gravel group rides used to be 60/60. It was good to ride together with weaker, especially tired riders. Riding with average guys and girls required 80/80 (and the derestricted speed). 100/100 was impractical as the batteries were drained too fast and it was still too weak assistance to keep up with the "horses" on asphalt. (I could keep up with the "horses" on gravel riding my Vado 6.0 at 60/60, equivalent to SL 120%).

The charts showed Vado SL was economical up to 60/60%. Above that, there was a curve of range decrease and then the curve became very steep. It might have something to do with the air drag?!
 
I went on a short ride today and my spoke protector broke.
A few rides ago, I noticed one of the plastic clips broke off and it was not centered. I re-centered it and figured it would hold on, but today it completely broke and was flopping around on the rear hub like a dying fish. It freaked me out at first since it sounded like a bunch of broken spokes.

I stopped on the side of the trail and removed it (by breaking it open on one side and sliding it off the hub).
Is it worth replacing this thing, or should I just forget it?

I had one on my old bike do the same thing, although it lasted 20 years before it finally broke.
Never had any issues with not having it on there, but that old bike didn't have disc brakes.
I don't want to get the brakes contaminated. I don't think the chain will fall off that top gear either since I never shift into that gear.
 
@Cycologist - If you keep the low gear derailleur stop screw adjusted properly to prevent the chain from shifting past the largest cassette cog you will not need what some refer to as a “dork disc”. If you want to be safe and prevent problems from the chain getting jammed between the cassette and hub/spokes you can replace the plastic disc, but it can fail as you found out.
 
That's what I figured. Thanks.

This week is shaping up to be bad luck for biking, at least for me.
Today I was getting the bike ready for another ride when I noticed the rear tire was completely flat.
This is the original Specialized tire which is supposed to have "Black Belt Puncture Protection".
After examining the tire, I noticed a tiny rock stuck in the center tread and it went in pretty deep. This was probably the culprit.

I took the tube off the wheel and tried to find the hole, but I couldn't. I had to dunk the tube in a bucket of water before I could find the exact location of the hole.
It was so tiny that I really couldn't even see it until I brought the tube outside in direct sunlight, then I finally saw it.

Patched it up and did my ride, although I lost about 45 min, so I had to cut it short.

I have a couple of TPU spares, but I want to save those for emergencies. I carry one with me in my bike bag.
 
Back