very few of my rides average significantly less than 25kph - the range is 24-29 for the vast majority, no motor at all… but the interesting thing is that even if a bike was limited to 25, that average would still go way up as long as the bike rode well with the motor off (like your vado sL, or a creo sl) since the motor would essentially raise the MINIMUM speed to 25kph!!My 40 year old friend rode my Vado SL with the 25 km/h limiter on and averaged 27 km/h on a 61 km trip. He has no problem to ride above 25 km/h unassisted as he's a good traditional gravel cyclist.
This checks out. I followed off the back of a pack of middle aged roadies on nice road bikes the other day just to see what pace they ride at. 20-25mph on undulating terrain- 35mph downhill. I had to put my Hydra in Eco 2 to keep up.The 45 km/h assist limit on cycling trails here in the USA does make more sense since most local road bike riders appear to easily ride at least that fast. I’m only faster up hill.
Hi,
I follow topics, but due to lack of time I rarely comment.
However, to contribute to the community with my experience. Namely, I own two Vado SL & 6.0 and below I have put two identical routes with the stated parameters of STRAVA.
Data is collected by Apple Watch.
It's interesting to see that the heart rate is higher on the SL (and it feels like I'm using more effort), while the 6.0 burns more calories.
By the way, with the mentioned support, I pull it out of the battery; - SL 90 KM - 6.0 80KM
.... but I think all data is transferred from the Apple Watch. ?to je zato što Strava prvenstveno koristi brzinu kako bi odredila količinu posla koji radite - a za bržu vožnju je potrebno puno više energije. Ono što Strava ne shvaća je da bicikl zapravo pruža tu dodatnu energiju.
osim ako na biciklu ne koristite ugrađeni mjerač snage (koji zapravo mjeri vaš energetski doprinos vožnji!) brojka kalorija u stravi potpuno je besmislena!
Hi,
I follow topics, but due to lack of time I rarely comment.
However, to contribute to the community with my experience. Namely, I own two Vado SL & 6.0 and below I have put two identical routes with the stated parameters of STRAVA.
Data is collected by Apple Watch.
It's interesting to see that the heart rate is higher on the SL (and it feels like I'm using more effort), while the 6.0 burns more calories.
By the way, with the mentioned support, I pull it out of the battery; - SL 90 KM - 6.0 80KM
that’s because strava is primarily using speed to determine the amount of work you’re doing - and riding faster takes much more energy. what strava doesn’t realize is that the bike is actually providing that extra energy.
unless you use the built-in power meter on the bike (which actually measures your energy contribution to the ride!) the calories figure in strava is completely meaningless!
Igor: First of all -- long time no see, friend! It's good to have you back!.... but I think all data is transferred from the Apple Watch. ?
Best regards, Stefan. you make an immense contribution to this topic.Igor: First of all -- long time no see, friend! It's good to have you back!
The factor that made your data misleading was the Apple Watch, as it has no idea how much of energy you actually input by pedalling. Your e-bikes know that precisely.
Also use the data of MC in Specialized "Ride" app (@mschwett can explain how to do it). For an experiment, use 35/35% assistance for Vado 6.0 and 70/70% for Vado SL. You might get surprised!Best regards, Stefan. you make an immense contribution to this topic.
Yes, the data is contrary to what I feel when riding these two bulls. Let's go like this, I make the same route with Vado SL, with the fact that I will transfer the data to Strava with MC (BIKE). I provide the data.
the watch can’t accurately determine how much work you’re doing since it has no idea how much work the bike is doing!.... but I think all data is transferred from the Apple Watch. ?