Frankly no one can be seen as "winning" until the outcome of this campaign is all done, with the very last bike delivered, and the reviews. It's like saying the first 3 plays of a football game are all you need to see to determine which team will win the game. Right now it's a bunch of posturing on both sides. I really dislike hype. The bike will do something. I mean, it's a bike. It can be ridden. Unless what's delivered is a bunch of little parts in a box, it should be okay. Worth the hype? Nothing is worth the hype in the end. It will be what it will be.
The product itself is getting mixed with the emotional upheaval about the business issues surrounding the campaign. The bike could be nice or it could be 'meh.' Or it could even be great for what it is. So that's one scale. The business issues, how this is coming together in the marketplace, how the founders are going to manage the complexities they face in bringing this product to their 'funders' is taking up almost more mindspace, and that's different. I doubt whether anyone who threw their money on the line cares what happens to the "business" as long as they get their bike(s) within a reasonable timeframe and those bikes then work. Whether Storm goes on to make more products, who knows. 99% of the people won't care. So all this talk about Storm and what Storm is going to do to solve problem A, B, C, Pffft. Who cares aside from Storm and the people who have to solve those issues. These are not investors in a business, they are 'funders' of a promise of 1 product and 1 product only. They want their 1 product and if the "business" then goes belly up or never goes further after getting their product, they won't care, as long as that product works.
Transparency and honesty goes far...... Sondors has little history to rely upon. The campaign has been built on hype and little else, would so many people have contributed cash on the basis of "we think we can build an ebike quite cheaply if we get enough money together and then take a flight to China and order in quantity? We don't know the specs or performance that this cheap ebike will have, but it will retail eventually for $1300 but you can have it now for $500?"
I think not.
Instead we have a fraudulent approach of stating performance and specs which were never credible, never tested, could never be realised with current battery technology at that price.
I agree that a relatively small run of bikes in the first instance would have served all two of team Sondors well to then expand it to a wider market, but now it is frankly unmanageable. There is one bike, one bike only - see how many more demo days there are and if the one bike can be professionally assessed over the coming weeks. Sondors says that this is a production model, before alleging that he is downright lying I am unsure if he is is claiming that this bike has the spec of those that will be delivered - shipping , batteries and duties is another issue entirely - or is one produced by the factory unknown.
Last edited: