Agree. But does everyone really think a product should be delivered for use to the consumer with the plethora of issues, complaints, concerns, problems, deficiencies, and on and on?
Sure, nice bike, sure technically “supposed” to be the new, improved model over the SC, but QC? Assembly is what? Wham, bam slam slap it together and just let the purchaser be alert and on the lookout for these types of issue?
Again, nice bike.....but I shudder to think of the whole big picture.
Is it a quality control issue? Design? Laziness? Consumer acceptance of sub-standard practices and allowance of manufacturers to get away with things and only oil the squeaky wheel and put out the BIG fires?
Believe me. I’ve researched the hell out of available competition (e-bikes). To ME it seems like any choice will be a gamble. Read the forums. Look at all the other manufacturers. Are these type of problems only a Trek problem? How about Yamaha, Brose,
Specialized, R&M, Giant?
I expect any purchase to meet my needs, requirements and expectations, otherwise it potentially is a lemon. Works for lots of other products.
I still have the swish, swoosh while peddling sounding like the agitator in a washing machine.
Also, separate post on smartphone hub placement of phone interferes with volume button.
What will be next?
Who on Earth were the testers before these models went to production?