This is almost always true about illegal "ebikes" causing these issues but it makes no difference. As a result, more hate is heaped on ALL ebikes. Their legal status doesn't matter.There is a certain kind of "ebike" that is usually the problem, and they are already illegal. Lack of enforcing the existing laws is usually the problem. We should probably wait to find out the details before jumping to conclusions.
Sorry, that's just plain silly. A new batch of ebike laws went into effect in CA at the start of 2026, and a new proposed bill, SB1167, already discussed in another thread, will soon come before the state legislature. All quite reasonable IMO, all aimed primarily at illegal ebikes and reckless riders.Their legal status doesn't matter.
It won't take many more incidents like this for the Peoples Republic of California to pass more restrictive laws.
The popularity and explosive growth in the number of e-bike riders across San Diego and Orange counties has created a steady drumbeat of calls to my office for more regulation to protect the safety of riders and the public.
In my family‚ we have had both the negative and positive experiences that come with e-bikes. Our daughter witnessed a dangerous e-bike crash that caused serious injury. However‚ we were early adopters of e-bikes‚ and my 79-year-old mother regularly rides one to her gym workouts!
One of the greatest risks of e-bikes is high speeds and dangerous riding‚ especially when driven by inexperienced‚ and sometimes too young riders.
The state has existing regulations on e-bikes. However‚ misleading marketing of “e-bikes” has led to many things being sold and used as e-bikes that are actually more accurately classified as mopeds or motorcycles.
The fastest e-bikes‚ defined as Class 3‚ cannot legally be ridden by anyone under the age of 16. However‚ many people don’t know what class of bicycle they are buying‚ what its top speed is or whether it is even an e-bike.
After working with bicycle and street safety groups‚ I have introduced legislation to stop these deceptive sales.
SB 1167 expressly states that misrepresenting faster electric vehicles as e-bikes is false advertising that can be prosecuted. In addition‚ sellers of faster or more powerful bicycles would be required to inform consumers that they don’t meet the definition of an e-bike and therefore require vehicle registrations and licenses to operate.
Finally‚ every e-bike sold in the state would be required to have a label on its frames facing skyward‚ so it is easy to see and read‚ identifying what class of e-bike it is and the maximum speed it can go.
This should eliminate misrepresentation‚ and confusion‚ in the marketplace. When people buy a vehicle of any kind‚ they should know what they are getting‚ what the requirements are to operate it and what the range of speed and dangers are.
What’s an E-bike?
This picture shows some of the many different two-wheeled electric vehicles sold. Some do not meet the California definition of an e-bike. Source: Mineta Transportation Institute.![]()
A Growing Market
According to the market research company IMARC Group‚ the sales of e-bikes are expected to continue to grow in coming years‚ making it more important than ever that people understand the differences among the types of vehicles being sold.![]()
I wasn't passing judgement on existing CA laws, I was merely expressing my frustration with what is happening where I live on the east coast. Most recently, the NJ ebike bill just signed into law.Sorry, that's just plain silly. A new batch of ebike laws went into effect in CA at the start of 2026, and a new proposed bill, SB1167, already discussed in another thread, will soon come before the state legislature. All quite reasonable IMO, all aimed primarily at illegal ebikes and reckless riders.
The only issue in my mind relates to the current law's failure to be more specific about the 750W power limit, as I discussed in the thread linked above.
The local regs in Encinitas and Carlsbad are also reasonable and with largely the same aims. Yes, they've reacted to some local tragedies in recent years, but they haven't overreacted.
Here's my state senator Blakespear on her sponsored SB1167 from a recent newsletter. Note the stated desire to protect legal ebiking by going after the bad actors. This stance is typical across the state.
Does that sound unreasonable to you?
I don't know, it just got under my skin. Someone reads about a fatal accident involving an ebike and runs to EBR to call for new ebike laws before the virtual ink was dry on the story he read.Why do people like to give their attention to stuff like this?
Okay, I will answer your question. We like our bikes and want to keep them. We want to see the upside of eBikes emphasized and recognized. We do not want our bikes being associated with motorcycles that are killing people and are being called bicycles because they are electrically powered instead of gas powered. We do not yet know the actual circumstances in this crash. We do know that the surface of this story fits into negative stereotypes.Why do people like to give their attention to stuff like this?
Youre right.Why do people like to give their attention to stuff like this?
Because people look for s*it like this to fill their world. People think by giving their attention to something they can fix it. Doesn’t work that way. You give it energy to grow more of it. Consciousness is energy. Wherever you send your consciousness you give it energy. And whatever you send out comes back to you gathering like energy all the way, for you to experience.Why do people like to give their attention to stuff like this?
Excellent outcome, well-written article for a change!Condolences to the bicyclist's family and friends killed in collision with e-bike rider.
Also in the news today...
Calif. dad gets felony charge over son's 60 mph e-motorcycle crash [Orange County father faces a felony charge]
They distinguished between eBike and E-moto / E-motorcycle in this article. It is rare.