Instead of banning certain members...

Status
Not open for further replies.

another view I guess
So is sticking your head up your ass...
 
DavidRvR, what you are doing is spreading Russian disinformation. Just delete it.
Why is it when you guys dont like a topic in a discussion or a different view its disinformation? or troll status... seems pretty closed minded.. I know I dont get my info from NPR but really?

Why is it wrong? Simple question? Why is anything I post wrong?

I have read the post for several days and it seems the crowd agrees on the same flow of posts and everyone is happy but introduce a different side and wow its automatically Russian disinformation? Sounds like all those USA intelligence agencies on the topic of Hunter Biden's laptop ... Look how that turned out.. it was actually correct but some will never see truth nor a difference of opinion.. Not mine.. Just adding some other THOUGHT..

Carry on.

I didnt read your post Handlebars until after but ..Seems to be the truth..

Really dont care if you block me.. wont hurt my feelings.. Some act like 3rd graders with the Troll comments..

Group mentality here to say hey im going to ignore this guy or this girl.. Funny how some have to mention the ignore button so many times... Im ok with being wrong and learning from it but id never learn if everyone always agreed with my thoughts. Be a simpleton.. think and and act like one.. ok by me.
 
Last edited:
In this case, DavidRvR, spreading false narratives and disinformation is actually doing the work of Russia’s cyber warfare dept. Your posts become part of a mass of online propaganda. So many people look at stuff on the internet and assume if it is there on the web, it must be true. If they see it many places, if it shows up in their Facebook feed, it gains credence. Like a virus, it hitches a ride wherever it can and it replicates. Quoting and providing links to such propaganda does free work for the FSB/KGB. It makes you a patsy.

The other day, I went to Pravda ("Truth") the grande dame of Soviet news. There was an article of patriotic blather, in English, using some of the $5 words gionnirocket dislikes. It was authored (putatively) by someone with a very British sounding hyphenated name, presumably to add double-barreled cache to the opinions expressed. But there was something off in the language, in the grammar, as though it was not a native English speaker. If you read it with a Russian accent though, it sounded okay, and it was very clear that it was written by a Russian speaker, masquerading as a British intellectual. But it was just Russian propaganda.

The (supposedly) Dutch reporter in that article you linked to is giving out "Pravda", not truth. It is so patently false, with the whole "Ukrainians staged it all" BS, that it is almost a theater of the absurd. Like Alex Jones and his whole insulting crap about how the Sandy Hook massacre never happened, it is a massive disrespect to everybody who died and all the families left bereft.

So if you insist on giving false equivalency to such disinformation and the actual truth, you may as well be handing out copies of "Pravda" on street corners. Which is actually what you are doing digitally.
 
In this case, DavidRvR, spreading false narratives and disinformation is actually doing the work of Russia’s cyber warfare dept. Your posts become part of a mass of online propaganda. So many people look at stuff on the internet and assume if it is there on the web, it must be true. If they see it many places, if it shows up in their Facebook feed, it gains credence. Like a virus, it hitches a ride wherever it can and it replicates. Quoting and providing links to such propaganda does free work for the FSB/KGB. It makes you a patsy.

The other day, I went to Pravda ("Truth") the grande dame of Soviet news. There was an article of patriotic blather, in English, using some of the $5 words gionnirocket dislikes. It was authored (putatively) by someone with a very British sounding hyphenated name, presumably to add double-barreled cache to the opinions expressed. But there was something off in the language, in the grammar, as though it was not a native English speaker. If you read it with a Russian accent though, it sounded okay, and it was very clear that it was written by a Russian speaker, masquerading as a British intellectual. But it was just Russian propaganda.

The (supposedly) Dutch reporter in that article you linked to is giving out "Pravda", not truth. It is so patently false, with the whole "Ukrainians staged it all" BS, that it is almost a theater of the absurd. Like Alex Jones and his whole insulting crap about how the Sandy Hook massacre never happened, it is a massive disrespect to everybody who died and all the families left bereft.

So if you insist on giving false equivalency to such disinformation and the actual truth, you may as well be handing out copies of "Pravda" on street corners. Which is actually what you are doing digitally.
But false propaganda is only used one way, right? Always one side does and the other side never does. That must be the most brainwashed ideation in decades.
You only have to use your memory and observe and compare what was said last month and what is said today, to see that you're being abused and then used.
Example: Hunter's laptop from hell.
Example: Ukraine biolabs.
Example: Ukraine biolabs funding directed by Hunter.
 
Last edited:
But false propaganda is only used one way, right? Always one side does and the other side never does. That must be the most brainwashed ideation in decades.
You only have to use your memory and observe and compare what was said last month and what is said today, to see that you're being abused and then used.
Example: Hunter's laptop from hell.
Example: Ukraine biolabs.
Example: Ukraine biolabs funding directed by Hunter.
False propaganda.......now there's an oxymoron for you.
I mean, shouldn't it have just read, propaganda.

CN
 
In this case, DavidRvR, spreading false narratives and disinformation is actually doing the work of Russia’s cyber warfare dept. Your posts become part of a mass of online propaganda. So many people look at stuff on the internet and assume if it is there on the web, it must be true. If they see it many places, if it shows up in their Facebook feed, it gains credence. Like a virus, it hitches a ride wherever it can and it replicates. Quoting and providing links to such propaganda does free work for the FSB/KGB. It makes you a patsy.

The other day, I went to Pravda ("Truth") the grande dame of Soviet news. There was an article of patriotic blather, in English, using some of the $5 words gionnirocket dislikes. It was authored (putatively) by someone with a very British sounding hyphenated name, presumably to add double-barreled cache to the opinions expressed. But there was something off in the language, in the grammar, as though it was not a native English speaker. If you read it with a Russian accent though, it sounded okay, and it was very clear that it was written by a Russian speaker, masquerading as a British intellectual. But it was just Russian propaganda.

The (supposedly) Dutch reporter in that article you linked to is giving out "Pravda", not truth. It is so patently false, with the whole "Ukrainians staged it all" BS, that it is almost a theater of the absurd. Like Alex Jones and his whole insulting crap about how the Sandy Hook massacre never happened, it is a massive disrespect to everybody who died and all the families left bereft.

So if you insist on giving false equivalency to such disinformation and the actual truth, you may as well be handing out copies of "Pravda" on street corners. Which is actually what you are doing digitally.
Just for clarification... I have no problem with anyone using any words..... but....
You insulted me and inferred that I was illiterate because I used foul language in a post.
Then shortly after in another thread you posted a video filled with the same language and prefaced it with some so called $5 words and think that makes it ok.
To that I say go f*ck yourself as you are not the gatekeeper of when foul language is appropriate. 🙃
 
Last edited:
False propaganda.......now there's an oxymoron for you.
I mean, shouldn't it have just read, propaganda.

CN
Not at all, propaganda is neither necessarily true nor necessarily false.

wiki: "Propaganda was conceptualized as a form of influence designed to build social consensus. In the 20th century, the term propaganda emerged along with the rise of mass media, including newspapers and radio. As researchers began studying the effects of media, they used suggestion theory to explain how people could be influenced by emotionally-resonant persuasive messages. Harold Lasswell provided a broad definition of the term propaganda, writing it as: “the expression of opinions or actions carried out deliberately by individuals or groups with a view to influencing the opinions or actions of other individuals or groups for predetermined ends and through psychological manipulations.”[6] Garth Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell theorize that propaganda and persuasion are linked as humans use communication as a form of soft power through the development and cultivation of propaganda materials.[7] In a 1929 literary debate with Edward Bernays, Everett Dean Martin argues that, "Propaganda is making puppets of us. We are moved by hidden strings which the propagandist manipulates."[8] In the 1920s and 30s, propaganda was sometimes described as all-powerful. For example, Bernays acknowledged in his book Propaganda that "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."[9]"
 
False propaganda.......now there's an oxymoron for you.
I mean, shouldn't it have just read, propaganda.

CN

"Definition of propaganda


1capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2: the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3: ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause
also : a public action having such an effect"
 
1650041379752.png
 
False propaganda.......now there's an oxymoron for you.
I mean, shouldn't it have just read, propaganda.

CN
The meaning of oxymoron:
  1. a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction (e.g. faith unfaithful kept him falsely true ).
 
Just for clarification... I have no problem with anyone using any words..... but....
You insulted me and inferred that I was illiterate because I used foul language in a post.
Then shortly after in another thread you posted a video filed with the same language and prefaced it with some so called $5 words and think that makes it ok.
To that I say go f*ck yourself as you are not the gatekeeper of when foul language is appropriate. 🙃
I don't have a problem with foul language, I use it all the time, but I don't aim it at people in writing on an open public forum. If I did post a video with swearing in it - - and I don't recall which one you are talking about - - it was still not cussing out someone here on the forum. To use a 5€ term, "ad hominem" attacks are what gets threads shut down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back