AHicks
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Snow Bird - Summer S.E. Michigan, Winter Gulf Coast North Central Fl.
AHicks, I know, and I do feel bad for people with weight problems, but since I have no problems telling someone not to smoke in a restaurant (no one talks about smoke shaming) I have to be honest that it does bother me that other people's weight issues cost me money. The average car sold in America has over $500 in costs for stronger and longer seat belts, stronger seats, stronger bolts to hold in the seat and so forth. And don't get me started about taking a flight and having people who don't fit in their seat and take up half the space you paid for. Is it condescending? I don't know...but it's also the truth.
OK, straight up.
Speaking of my own weight (312) it's not an issue, I have no interest in weight reduction, and my physicals, including blood work, come back as good or better than most in my age range. I'm big for sure, but I have no "weight problem". If I do have a problem, it's with some people's perception.
As far as your 500 figure, and genetics, I'm not going to downplay there are those with weight concerns. That aside for just a moment, regarding genetics, are you saying the average 5'6" 165lb (the figures the FAA used for average at the time) guy of the 1950's is still "average" today? If so, please expand on your logic. Are you condemning my 6'2" height as an issue too? If that's not an issue, would it not be logical to say that car manf's are dealing with bigger people in general, and it is very definetly genetics in play here?
And both of these aside, what, if anything, has this got to do with my (non) preference for a lightweight bike, or being very happy with my over achieving average weight bike? You don't agree that I should be out riding because I want to? Because I enjoy being outdoors? Are you saying that I should only ride while trying to stay fit while on a light weight bike?
Are you not imposing your priorities someplace you have no business placing them?