Mr. Coffee
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- A Demented Corner of the North Cascades
I was told the troll was demanding "evidence" about what Exxon knew about global warming, climate change, and CO2 emissions 40 years ago:
Thanks mr coffee. I relegated the fellow to ignor again a week or two ago. Pigeon on the game table analogy fits.I was told the troll was demanding "evidence" about what Exxon knew about global warming, climate change, and CO2 emissions 40 years ago:
As usual, that screed is based on false information - the misconduct and errors fight is so old because Mann's hubris won't allow him to admit faults and instead he smeared people who found fault.I think this "both sides" fallacy is a bunch of bull pucky.
Only one side in this debate has argued in extremely bad faith, bordering on malevolence. I think arguing that the whole hypothesis of human-caused climate change is invalid because of possible "misconduct" or "errors" in a paper nearly 20 years old, while ignoring all of the other evidence that is plain as day if you just open your eyes, is a clear case of arguing in extreme bad faith.
Oh, Thomas, you don't need to make up stories. Even last Saturday the 11th we were having pleasant exchanges and you liked my posts and nothing changed until you came up empty here.Thanks mr coffee. I relegated the fellow to ignor again a week or two ago. Pigeon on the game table analogy fits.
you said:I said:Nice..you can see the difference between cells. That is your beater battery?
No, it's the same as I support for an online reseller. But I did buy a 36V 17Ah 35E for my new MAC and folder.
You provided a lot smears and not much else. You offer no quotes that show what you claimedI was told the troll was demanding "evidence" about what Exxon knew about global warming, climate change, and CO2 emissions 40 years ago:
As for "extreme": perhaps you should go have a conversation with people in Australia about what "extreme" means.
Perhaps you could also drop in on Paradise, CA and see what they think as well.
The industry had the science 30 years ago and knew what was going to happen but made no warning so that preemptive steps could have been taken.
The truth will set you free...
Australia wildfires started by 100+ arsonists.
Paradise wildfires started by PG&E power lines.
It must be nice being able to pass around disinformation...
We have a fact here! One that you have evidence for!! Yay!As for the fires in CA, yes they were started by power lines
However, the hotter conditions earlier in the year produced extremely dry fuel conditions which made those fires catastrophic. Even very slightly elevated air temperatures, over a long period of time, can accelerate evaporation and decrease the humidity of fuels.
It must be nice being able to pass around disinformation...
Not a lie if you consider 100 to be "only a handful". Thanks again for your diligent work!Only a handful of fires were deliberately ignited. But that didn’t stop people from spreading misinformation.
For me personally it is about glaciers.
I can go to a great many places in the North Cascades right out my door where thirty or even twenty years ago I would go skiing on a Labor Day weekend above the firn line....