Front page LA Times today regarding Ebikes

I see three posts of assumptions with zero data to back it up. There was a mall shooting not too long ago that was stopped quickly by a concealed carrier. I don't recall the circumstances, but ht was there, took action and saved lives. Do I fantisize about that being me? Absolutely not. Would I have done the same thing had I been in that situation, yes. But it isn't anything that I focus on. Why are those instances of private citizen stopping such things rare? Because some states have told you that the police will keep you safe at the same time the police have no duty to protect you. The chances of the police stopping a mass shooting with the same speed as the young man in the mall are just as slim as the young man doing it himself, because the police can't be everywhere all the time.

But hey, it's been fun being told that I'm evil, and apparently mentally ill and incompetent by people that know nothing about me by making wild assed assumptions obviously pulled out of someone's ass.

I realize that I have no chance of changing anyone's entrenched positions here, but some of you guys really need take and honest look at your own emotions and how you deal with people.
I think Mr. Coffee needs some of those cookies (to dunk in his coffee?) that you took to that family whose horses got out. After reading how all that went down, I don't know how anyone can say you're lacking compassion. Half the population would have been too pissed at them to give them the time of day, and would have 'lawyered up' to sue them.

Too bad more people aren't aware of how many crimes are deterred on a daily basis by citizens with firearms. Most of the time just because of the gun's presence, without firing a shot.
 
I think Mr. Coffee needs some of those cookies (to dunk in his coffee?) that you took to that family whose horses got out. After reading how all that went down, I don't know how anyone can say you're lacking compassion. Half the population would have been too pissed at them to give them the time of day, and would have 'lawyered up' to sue them.

Too bad more people aren't aware of how many crimes are deterred on a daily basis by citizens with firearms. Most of the time just because of the gun's presence, without firing a shot.
Thank you. I just spent 12 hours with a family of 21 ranging in age from sub-toddler, teens, young married couple and mid 50's. They all knew I was carrying, we had a fun time, had dinner together at the best pizza place here on my suggestion.

Yes, in regards to that situation, that is what the Amish have come to expect when something like that happens. Including people coming back months to years later after it's been settled and try to sue. There was no point in being angry since it accomplishes nothing. It is better to look for the good in the bad, and move on. In our case we have new friends, and our family is now a welcome part of their community.
 
I realize that I have no chance of changing anyone's entrenched positions here
It's manufactured consent & consensus. Unless you too have a mass media machine at your disposal...
Edit: and that's why some were big mad at the Twitter purchase. Literally a modern psychological & information warfare weapon that's been somewhat disarmed.
 
Last edited:
Allow me to tell you a very true story of compassion.

I'm sure that many of you have heard of the Nickel Mines School shooting that happened a few years ago. If not, please google it, but I'll give you the gist and what many are probably not aware of because the media didn't really write about it much.

A man, that was known the community took over the school, told all the boys and the adults to leave and kept all the young girls in. He boarded up the windows then tied/taped up the girls on the floor. One of the young girls ran out with the boys, no one is sure if she did it because she knew what was happening or if she just didn't understand the order. You see, Amish kids don't learn english until they go to school. Until then they only know PA dutch and a smattering of english.

There was a standoff that went on for hours, eventually the man shot the girls lying on the floor, then shot himself, that allowed PSP to enter the school and quickly get the injured to the hospital, they were flown to local hospitals and to two in Delaware. Some lived, some were taken off life support.

After dark that night, the wife of the shooter was at home after being informed of what happened and that her husband had killed himself. I'm sure she was terrified and horribly confused. She looked out her front window and saw 40 Amish men approach her house an come onto the porch. She locked her doors because she didn't know if she was in danger and then were there to seek retribution for the crimes of her husband.

No, they convinced her to let them in. They came in, talked with her, prayed with her, told her that they held no animosity towards her and I believe at that point told her they forgave her husband for his horrid crimes. That wasn't just for show, that's how they live. I wonder how many could have that kind of compassion? I'm not sure I could at the time.

When it came to preparing her husband's body for the funeral no home would do the job. I don't know who eventually did, but it eventually got done. The day of the funeral and full blown committee of reporters were at the graveyard. When the wife arrived she was visibly upset, a large group of Amish men were there too. They saw her discomfort and they surrounded her to shield her from the cameras. They escorted her to the grave and stayed with her, and comforted her the entire time.

Fast forward to about a year and half ago. I was talking to a man that doesn't live in that area, but it is well aware of it's happening, he knows the families, but his family wasn't involved. We got to talking about crimes related to the Amish community, including the story of the kidnapping, rape and murder of Linda Stolzfoos (google the name). His first question for me about it was "How can someone do things like that?" I replied "I'll tell you, but I think you already know the answer. Some people are just evil." He agreed. We talked on the subject for over an hour. At one point I asked him if he thought the gun evil. His reply "no the person committing the act is evil".

Now, a lot of people because of this and the thinking that the amish are pacifists that they would be pro gun control. They're not, the idea of the government taking guns away from innocent people is abhorrent to them. One of their strongest beliefs is that of personal choice and freedom.

The topic of self defense came up during that talk, and I asked him it came to it, and he had to use a gun for defense would he? He said "well.<deep thought for a few seconds> If someone was hurting my daughters I guess I'd have to do something about that." I then asked him what about defending himself he just replied he didn't know. I asked him "don't you have the right to live your life with your family (family is very important to them)." He reply "I guess I'll have to think about that." In our world, that would normally be a dismissive and end of conversation reply. With the Amish I know that he would return to that and give it thought. They are not impulsive in their replies when the topic needs thought.

I have been with families that were affected by the school shooting, those that lost children and those that survived. I have been with the teens that knew Linda Stolzfoos as well. I never broach the subject with them, but there are times they will talk to me about it. It is very easy to learn compassion when you're faced with that situation.

If you're one of those depraved types that like to visit places of tragedy, don't bother coming here looking for the Nickel Mines school, it was torn down the day it was turned back to the community. There is no evidence a school was ever there. I drive by it maybe 3 times a week.

There it is, that's true and honest compassion. I don't know if I could do what those families did, but I certainly can respect them for it. The media still tries to use them to push an antigun narrative on the anniversary of the shooting every year. But the media just likes to make crap up about them and publish it like it's the truth.
 
I hear you @JedidiahStolzfus. You speak with great humanity and compassion around genuine tragedy.

If we can dispassionately step back from the partisanship, industry lobbyists positions, and questions of identity what do the stats say? The charts and link below suggests there may be a statistical correlation between gun ownership and homicide. The link goes on to explore assault rates in developed nations. The US was far from the top of that list, meaning it's not any more violent than anywhere else (for example, Australia - the country I live in - had over double the rate of violent crime at the time of that study). When lots of people own guns, unsurprisingly violent interactions result in homicide more frequently.

Speaking from what stats I can find and the Australian experience (an imperfect 'control study'), if you want to see less mass homicide events then cut the number of firearms per capita, simple as that. If you think the right to bear arms is worth the price of however hundreds or thousands of mass shooting events a year then so be it. Call it the price of admission, the cost of 'freedom', the butcher bill. It's a steep cost. Whatever the lobbyists will try and spin I don't see a path to reducing one without reducing the other.
GUN_SCATTER2.jpg

HOMICIDE_GUN_US.jpg

Source: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...-violence-mass-shootings-us-statistics-charts
 
Taking guns, away from millions of people like me, isn't going to reduce mass shootings. It comes down to a morality problem, and no, I'm not talking about religion. It's a general lack of respect for our fellow man. In some communities, someone gets "disrespected" and the guns come out. That isn't a person like me, doing that, that is a person with a broken moral compass. A couple years ago, a pedestrian yelled at a driver to slow down in a residential area. The driver stopped and shot him, again, a broken moral compass. Of course, the other problem that goes hand in hand with that situation is that the guy should have been in jail, but we currently have DA's across the country that refuse to press charges against many violent criminals and let them out on low, or no bail for them to re-offend before their court dates even come up.

There are countless cases across the country where a person is arrested with a firearm when they're not legally allowed to possess one. Those charges many times dropped, or their plead down, just so the DA can get a win. When that happens, the criminal isn't sentence to the crime they actually committed so they're not put away where they should be. This is done out of a twisted sense of morality that it's wrong to lock up criminals.

How about, instead of passing new laws, we thoroughly enforce the laws that are already there. If you dig into the history of the actual reported mass shooting, you'll quickly find that many times the person that has the gun shouldn't have had it to begin with, mistakes were made, but those that made those mistakes are never held accountable. The mass shooting that we don't hear about are those that happen in large cities, NY, Chicago, Philly, and LA being the large suppliers of stats. Those shootings aren't talked about in the media, instead they're just used to pad the statistics. No one cares of a bunch of gangs in the inner cities shoot each there, there's no compassion for them, there's no sidewalk piles of teddy bears for them. They're just stats.

In many of the cases of young people shooting up schools, it's a parental failure that lead to it, a prime early example of that would be Brenda Ann Spencer, a trouble teen. Her father, trying to connect with her bought her a rifle. She got high on something (she now recants that) and started shooting at the school across the street. Her father knew she was troubled, probably not a good idea to give her a rifle. She didn't steal it, she was given it.

In the instance of Harris and Klebold, they were able to build bombs and stash guns in their home without their parents knowledge. That's a sign of disinterest and probably the parents just too busy to care what the kids were doing. I'm not saying that a parent needs to spy on their children, but you should at least be aware of their activities.

As you start looking into these stories, you'll find there's a lot of parenting failure. In many other cases the signs were there that the person was troubled, and probably needed help, but too many people are blind to either through their own selfishness or disinterest.

We as a society need to do better to raise kids with a strong moral compass (again, doesn't have to be religion) with the strength to do the right thing, to care enough to take an interest in their lives, help them when they need help. Talk to them about the problems they're having. Just make time for your kids. If you see one of your kid's friends being troubled, talk to them too, see if you can help without intruding on their parent's responsibilities. Yes, it can be done.
 
Taking guns, away from millions of people like me, isn't going to reduce mass shootings.
But it will. I'm not arguing on the personal level. You sound like a standup citizen and I'd love to have you as a neighbor and friend. But look at the aggregate stats. What happens when more people own guns? The data and countless studies are available for anyone to peruse. Study after study links gun ownership to higher homicide rates. You can't have one without the other - they're intrinsically linked.

The example you went on to give illustrates this perfectly. If the road rage perpetrator had no gun on their person it would likely have been marked up as a violent assault. Not great but both participants live another day. They did, and instead it was a homicide.

That's the cold, grim reality of examining the stats alone: the link between guns and homicide is clear. What we choose to do with this knowledge is on us. I think it's an overwhelming issue in the US that will take generations to arrest, if the political will ever emerged at all. I think it's probably too entrenched for that. I can also see stats have no place in such a triggering subject for many (pun begrudgingly intended). Anyway, this topic is a sinkhole. Over and out.
 
Last edited:
But it will. I'm not arguing on the personal level. You sound like a standup citizen and I'd love to have you as a neighbor and friend. But look at the aggregate stats. What happens when more people own guns? The data and countless studies are available for anyone to peruse. Study after study links gun ownership to higher homicide rates. You can't have one without the other - they're intrinsically linked.

The example you went on to give illustrates this perfectly. If the road rage perpetrator had no gun on their person it would likely have been marked up as a violent assault. Not great but both participants live another day. They did, and instead it was a homicide.

That's the cold, grim reality of examining the stats alone: the link between guns and homicide is clear. What we choose to do with this knowledge is on us. I think it's an overwhelming issue in the US that will take generations to arrest, if the political will ever emerged at all. I think it's probably too entrenched for that. Anyway, this topic is a sinkhole. Over and out.
Yes, and do you think all those criminals out there are going to turn in their guns out of compassion? No, they won't because they're criminals. All you're doing is removing firearms from people that aren't using them in crimes leaving them defenseless against an army of criminals that don't care how compassionate you are.

If you want to live that way, that's your choice, but my choice is to not live that way. I'm sure they'll be a retort (not from you) that "I refuse to live my life in fear, that's why I don't have a gun." Well, it's not about living in fear, it's about being prepared, no different than any other ways I am prepared, which are numerous and plentiful. There have been many cases where those preparations have been used. My wife and I even do seminars on it.

There were 10K+ DUI related deaths, some of them killing children, I don't see anyone demanding the return of prohibition. What did prohibition actually bring about? Gangs violating the law, lots of deaths due to those gangs. A segment of society will always be criminal, that's a fact. Leaving innocent people defenseless allows the gangs to thrive.

Maybe the military and other federal agencies need have their firearms removed since they're apparently unable to keep track of them: https://apnews.com/article/governme...litics-crime-6caba27108d05a8b7c1860959d1ae130

The police are so much better at keeping track of their firearms.
5yqT5ZoatRaBXpcEOQ5fbG7ltYXF_rmTlGrmd0pf2x4.jpg


Multiple PD's have found that firearms have gone missing from evidence lockers only to be resold on the street. That isn't being done by civilians, that's cops stealing and then selling them.

The point of all that is, that taking my guns isn't going to stop the flow of guns into criminals hands.
 
Rome, my wife just came up with a riding challenge for you. You need to ride from the Aston Waikiki Sunset hotel down to the Hard Rock Cafe, buy 3 tshirts and make it back to the hotel in under 12 minutes to beat our time when we did it by taxi on the last day of our Honeymoon.
 
I will however plan a Waikiki ride and post pictures of Aston Sunset and Hard Rock Cafe.
My Dad's house is near diamond head I have to check on him anyway. I bought a used VW Tiguan for him couple weeks ago, had to give tutorials on how to use the display. He was very pleased with reverse camera and keyless features.
We called it our Mr. Toad's Wild Ride. We had our luggage with the concierge and hailed the only cab we could find on sunday morning. We forgot we wanted to get some Tshirts for friends at home. Asked the cabbie if he could get us from the hotel to the HardRock, then back to the hotel in under 20 minutes because our shuttle was coming. Down and back in 12 minutes. He dropped us off at the curb said he'd wait, and we sprinted to the HardRock, grabbed the TShirts and ran back to the cab, the door open and waiting. He got a good tip.
 
Yes, Tactical is premeditation. If you carry equipment to poach alligators on public land, that shows intent to poach. If you pack firearms that shows premeditated intent to murder fellow humans in public. Australia is a prime example to follow. Less is more. Putting a ton of hand grenades in a forest of chimps will result in deaths. It is not about their intent or goodness or badness. It is about proliferation. Quantity. We have the problem of proliferation to solve. Many US guns go to the South causing problems in other country's which in turn cause further problems here. Getting rid of or our gun addiction will solve this. Gun apologizers, marketers and lobbyists be dammed.
1675313188886.png
 
Last edited:
Sometimes we have to take the bad with the good.

I bet we could stop all crime if we put shock collars and 24/7 monitoring on every single person. Is it the right thing to do to everyone?

Maybe if we just put the collars on anyone who uses a throttle or exceeds 20mph on their ebike.... o_O
 
Everyone with a gun is a potential murderer.
Everyone with a penis is a potential rapist.
Everyone with a vagina is a potential prostitute.

In the immortal words of Meatloaf, two outta three ain't bad.
 
Gunna be tough to get rid of guns.

There's a lot of milling machines in private hands. A good friend of mine is a machinist and has a full shop, including a 3Axis CNC. He's made parts for machines that I was fixing. There are some unscrupulous out there that are willing to make firearms and sell them to anyone. It cannot be stopped.
I don't think the videos will embed here, but there's several out there of people making AK's out of shovels. There's one out there of a guy melting beer cans and milling an AR-15 lower. Those videos were done just to prove the point that it can be done.

My AR15 identifies as a power tool.
url

Dewalt-AR15-nail-gun.jpg

No, it's not really mine.
 
There's a lot of milling machines in private hands. A good friend of mine is a machinist and has a full shop, including a 3Axis CNC. He's made parts for machines that I was fixing. There are some unscrupulous out there that are willing to make firearms and sell them to anyone. It cannot be stopped.
I don't think the videos will embed here, but there's several out there of people making AK's out of shovels. There's one out there of a guy melting beer cans and milling an AR-15 lower. Those videos were done just to prove the point that it can be done.

My AR15 identifies as a power tool.
url

Dewalt-AR15-nail-gun.jpg

No, it's not really mine.

I was watching a documentary last night where a reporter was invited to a meeting of a gang selling Ghost guns to someone. The sellers comment was something to the effect of once the info on how to build them is out there, it's too late to stop gun manufacturing at home with a 3d printer. Apparently, all the components are available to buy off of the internet legally...
 
Yes, Tactical is premeditation. If you carry equipment to poach alligators on public land, that shows intent to poach. If you pack firearms that shows premeditated intent to murder fellow humans in public. Australia is a prime example to follow. Less is more. Putting a ton of hand grenades in a forest of chimps will result in deaths. It is not about their intent or goodness or badness. It is about proliferation. Quantity. We have the problem of proliferation to solve. Many US guns go to the South causing problems in other country's which in turn cause further problems here. Getting rid of or our gun addiction will solve this. Gun apologizers, marketers and lobbyists be dammed.
View attachment 146017
its a problem,one reason I do not carry and never wanted a CC permit,my everloving state of VA allows CC in bars,talking about putting out a fire with gasoline.
 
On this we’ll never agree. Best I just STFU.

Armed, and in favor of far tougher gun laws. And restricting ownership of several types.
no one needs a barret or tommygun or a gatling gun for that matter a"street sweeper" knew a cat who proudly displayed his streetsweeper, he was pretty much a gearhead anyway( had a fax machine in the bootend of his crownvic,he was part owner in a paving co.
that being said you can legally come up with some pretty deadly stuff
 
Back