I'm bike shopping. Whoo there is a bewildering array of available options. I'm starting to zero in on Specialized, though Trek is not out of the running yet. I definitely want a mid-drive with torque sensor.
Concern: I read a lot of comments saying Specialized's service is crap, while Trek is first-rate. Is this really a problem? What about reliability?
Specialized's website is not terribly helpful. Is there a summary anywhere that explains the differences between Vado, Como, Tero, etc? The Levo and Kenevo are apparently mtn bikes (and Levo is way out of my price range) but Vado/Como/Tero are all "active," whatever that means. I think the Como is basically an urban bike, Vado is also street-ish but maybe a bit more road-ish?, Tero is more of an "adventure" bike?
I'm not looking for a mountain bike. I'm 67 and won't be bombing down any mountain trails. I'd love to do some off-road cycling but there are limited options around here (northern Colorado) -- most trails are more rugged than I want to bike. Hell they're pretty rugged to *hike* -- I have a banged-up knee and minor head injury from a recent faceplant. So most of my riding will be bike trails and roads, but it would be nice to be able to go off-road.
The SL bikes are interesting -- 40%ish lighter sounds mighty nice. But obviously they give up a lot to slim down that much. I've read comments that the SLs are underpowered and other complaints. Any experiences there?
The belt drives sound good. Not sure if I'd want an IGH or not. Some big advantages, some disadvantages, but most people seem to love 'em.
Comments, recommendations, warnings? Thanks!
Concern: I read a lot of comments saying Specialized's service is crap, while Trek is first-rate. Is this really a problem? What about reliability?
Specialized's website is not terribly helpful. Is there a summary anywhere that explains the differences between Vado, Como, Tero, etc? The Levo and Kenevo are apparently mtn bikes (and Levo is way out of my price range) but Vado/Como/Tero are all "active," whatever that means. I think the Como is basically an urban bike, Vado is also street-ish but maybe a bit more road-ish?, Tero is more of an "adventure" bike?
I'm not looking for a mountain bike. I'm 67 and won't be bombing down any mountain trails. I'd love to do some off-road cycling but there are limited options around here (northern Colorado) -- most trails are more rugged than I want to bike. Hell they're pretty rugged to *hike* -- I have a banged-up knee and minor head injury from a recent faceplant. So most of my riding will be bike trails and roads, but it would be nice to be able to go off-road.
The SL bikes are interesting -- 40%ish lighter sounds mighty nice. But obviously they give up a lot to slim down that much. I've read comments that the SLs are underpowered and other complaints. Any experiences there?
The belt drives sound good. Not sure if I'd want an IGH or not. Some big advantages, some disadvantages, but most people seem to love 'em.
Comments, recommendations, warnings? Thanks!