Chain ring tooth selection

I'm new here and noticed this thread hasn't had any activity for a while but wanted to start here. I have a 2020 Turbo 4. After reading this thread and doing a fair amount of research, I plan to:
1. Put a 52t chainring on front, chose the Deckas. Anyone see a problem?
2. Put on a KMC X10e 136 link chain which seems to be the consensus. I know how to size it.
3. Use Truvativ steel chainring bolts. Anyone see a problem?
4. Put on a 11-34 cassette when they are back in stock.
Why this set? I only use my Vado for commuting and errands. I'm always on city streets and live in the Phoenix valley - no hills at all. During my commute, I'm always between 24-28 miles per hours. This set should (per bikecalc.com) give me the best cadence (I ride at 90-100 rpms) and keep me on the 15 and 17t cogs. If I went to the 48t chainring, I can only optimize my speed and cadence with a 12-28 cassette which keeps me in the 14 and 15t cogs. I think I will get better longevity if on bigger cogs. Anyone have feedback?
Final question, probably for "bellandbottle," will I be able to change the chainring without the specialty tools and taking off the crankarm? I have the chainring bolt tool and it fits behind the chainring from a bottom front approach. I don't see anything that would require me to take the crankarm off.
You guys put some awesome info on here and thanks for that.
I also used the Dekas, but the 48tooth, easy swap out, no special tools. I did need LBS to change the torque settings in the software to change chainring sizes. Also replaced rear cassette but stuck with the original Shimano configuration.
8BC4C0AA-8A7F-4EFE-96BD-C22945D3CA21.jpeg
 
Thanks for the photo. I should have plenty of clearance with the 52t based on where the frame contours. I wasn't planning to add a chain guard; I'm either in shorts all the time or wear tapered bike pants because 35F is about as cold as it gets here. Are you having any issues without the chain guard? I can't imagine experiencing a chain drop with the narrow/wide on a 52t.
 
So far no issues with no guard
Thanks for the photo. I should have plenty of clearance with the 52t based on where the frame contours. I wasn't planning to add a chain guard; I'm either in shorts all the time or wear tapered bike pants because 35F is about as cold as it gets here. Are you having any issues without the chain guard? I can't imagine experiencing a chain drop with the narrow/wide on a 52t.
No, no issue w/o chain guard. Super happy with this setup.
 
I also used the Dekas, but the 48tooth, easy swap out, no special tools. I did need LBS to change the torque settings in the software to change chainring sizes. Also replaced rear cassette but stuck with the original Shimano configuration.
View attachment 71339
Sounds like RTeremi is using the 48t chainring?

Thanks for the photo. I should have plenty of clearance with the 52t based on where the frame contours. I wasn't planning to add a chain guard; I'm either in shorts all the time or wear tapered bike pants because 35F is about as cold as it gets here. Are you having any issues without the chain guard? I can't imagine experiencing a chain drop with the narrow/wide on a 52t.
Perhaps @Stefan Mikes can comment, but I recall that I estimated the frame to chain ring clearance for the 52t ring on my Vado. It was so close that I called it as 'does not fit'. It's raining now, or I'd check it again. I laid a thin metal ruler behind the chain ring on my Vado at the center line of the crank. The 52t ring was right on the edge of the frame, though this could could vary by frame and model year so YRMV.
 
I'm new here and noticed this thread hasn't had any activity for a while but wanted to start here. I have a 2020 Turbo 4. After reading this thread and doing a fair amount of research, I plan to:
1. Put a 52t chainring on front, chose the Deckas. Anyone see a problem?
2. Put on a KMC X10e 136 link chain which seems to be the consensus. I know how to size it.
3. Use Truvativ steel chainring bolts. Anyone see a problem?
4. Put on a 11-34 cassette when they are back in stock.
Why this set? I only use my Vado for commuting and errands. I'm always on city streets and live in the Phoenix valley - no hills at all. During my commute, I'm always between 24-28 miles per hours. This set should (per bikecalc.com) give me the best cadence (I ride at 90-100 rpms) and keep me on the 15 and 17t cogs. If I went to the 48t chainring, I can only optimize my speed and cadence with a 12-28 cassette which keeps me in the 14 and 15t cogs. I think I will get better longevity if on bigger cogs. Anyone have feedback?
Final question, probably for "bellandbottle," will I be able to change the chainring without the specialty tools and taking off the crankarm? I have the chainring bolt tool and it fits behind the chainring from a bottom front approach. I don't see anything that would require me to take the crankarm off.
You guys put some awesome info on here and thanks for that.
Hello @ci2i68 , you are doing the change for exactly the same reasons as me - flat (ish) terrain, and a wish to move up the cassette. I cannot be all that much help, as I took my lead from @TS25 when it came to planning what to do - he has done this kind of thing more than once. Now that I see what @RTeremi has done with his, I really wonder why I was so caught up in sourcing the bash guard, but it is done now :). I am still very happy with the outcome.
 
Last edited:
, I plan to:
1. Put a 52t chainring on front, chose the Deckas. Anyone see a problem?
2. Put on a KMC X10e 136 link chain which seems to be the consensus. I know how to size it.
3. Use Truvativ steel chainring bolts. Anyone see a problem?
4. Put on a 11-34 cassette when they are back in stock.
Why this set? ... Anyone have feedback?
Final question, probably for "bellandbottle," will I be able to change the chainring without the specialty tools and taking off the crankarm? I have the chainring bolt tool and it fits behind the chainring from a bottom front approach. I don't see anything that would require me to take the crankarm off.

Welcome here and thanx for your input. 👍

ad 1.
Problematic point could be as Sierratim has shown: is the 52T chainring to big at the rear for a Vado? You might be the first to test the 52T on a Vado as Speedmerchant first proved it fits on a Como.

ad 2.
KMC X10e or Shimano HG601 / HG701 / E8000 are in use, HG901 a bit expensive. Shimano 136 link chains might be more common in EU shops (and a lot cheaper) but harder to get hold of in the US.

ad 3. no. Maybe a little more work if you have to file the sleeve down a bit 😉

ad 4.
Your setup seems to meet your needs.

Regarding "specialty tools": I didn't know the special chainringbolt tool so I couldn't test it on the Vado. But as you say your "dry test" showed that you could get behind the Vado chainring and hold the chainringbolt with it from the back. If so there would be no need to take the spider off!
In term of cost there is little difference whether you buy the special chainringbolt tool or the special spider tools so it's everyone's choice and preferred preference or what's already in your tool box. The spider tool you might need for belt exchange, too.
 
Last edited:
I rode over the very same route with both Trance E+ and Vado 5 yesterday (the first Giant ride was to get shipment from a parcel locker, and the Specialized one was to retrieve an item that fell out off my pocket on the first ride) :) There is a highway cutting through the lowland around. To get across the highway (when you approach it by a dirt path), you need to ride up a very short but quite steep climb -- and then you need to stop at the top to let cars pass by.

Trance E+ has a 36T chainring and proper gearing. It was very easy to ride up the incline -- that's an e-MTB. To my surprise, I had trouble to do the same with the 48T chainring Vado in the granny gear! Vado stopped before it could reach the top :)

Of course nothing serious or critical but it was a good depiction why the chainring size might matter.
my new 38T on my Vado SL (swapping out the Praxis 44T) has been an astonishing revelation on the steep gradients here. Not only can I climb the 20% steep parts (still in granny gear obviously), but now can do them in Sport set at 70% rather then Turbo and most interestingly the motor seems far happier, really seems far more powerful. It's changed how I ride.
 
@RTeremi how did you hold the sleeve nuts in position when you did this work? A very clean bike :cool:.

yes, I wished Dekas had tapped those holes: bought sleeve nuts and then used painting tape on the inside to hold the sleeves while I started the bolts. Truth be told, I had to do this 2x as I added a washer on the second attempt as the chain lined up better slightly more inboard. (The washer is on the bolt side)
 
yes, I wished Dekas had tapped those holes: bought sleeve nuts and then used painting tape on the inside to hold the sleeves while I started the bolts. Truth be told, I had to do this 2x as I added a washer on the second attempt as the chain lined up better slightly more inboard. (The washer is on the bolt side)
Thanks for that - I wondered if you had some magic tool to do the job :).
 
This here?
I think that Specialised, if they had their time again, might make it easier to do these chainring changes. What is coming out of this thread is that individuals need to be able to choose the chainring of their bikes to suit their particular circumstances, and personal preference (eg) hilly or flat, US speeds or EU speeds, preferred cadence etc - it is all coming from the removal of the front derailleur, and the 2/3 chainring setup. The good news is that we have a community here which is able to help people solve the problem :) .
 
I'm new here and noticed this thread hasn't had any activity for a while but wanted to start here. I have a 2020 Turbo 4. After reading this thread and doing a fair amount of research, I plan to:
1. Put a 52t chainring on front, chose the Deckas. Anyone see a problem?
2. Put on a KMC X10e 136 link chain which seems to be the consensus. I know how to size it.
3. Use Truvativ steel chainring bolts. Anyone see a problem?
4. Put on a 11-34 cassette when they are back in stock.
Why this set? I only use my Vado for commuting and errands. I'm always on city streets and live in the Phoenix valley - no hills at all. During my commute, I'm always between 24-28 miles per hours. This set should (per bikecalc.com) give me the best cadence (I ride at 90-100 rpms) and keep me on the 15 and 17t cogs. If I went to the 48t chainring, I can only optimize my speed and cadence with a 12-28 cassette which keeps me in the 14 and 15t cogs. I think I will get better longevity if on bigger cogs. Anyone have feedback?
Final question, probably for "bellandbottle," will I be able to change the chainring without the specialty tools and taking off the crankarm? I have the chainring bolt tool and it fits behind the chainring from a bottom front approach. I don't see anything that would require me to take the crankarm off.
You guys put some awesome info on here and thanks for that.
I went with the 48T simply because the 52T seems like once you install the chain . Is going to be really close to the chain Stay . Keep in Mind that Specialized designed the Bike around the 48T Ring . IMO if you start going to far past what designers felt was optimal. You'll screw up the allowable tolerances they built the bike on.
I also will say although I like how the 48T Feels . Once you turn on Power . Getting to cadence to sustain 28 MPH is hardly any different then the 40 T was. I hindsight : With My Generic Bikes I don't use most of the gears either.

As far as removing the Chainring on a Vado . All you need is an 5 MM wrench . Plus a NM/In pounds Torque Wrench. Proper torque is a Must . Proper Torque is what makes things work or not work. It's super easy to do IMO 52T is going to lead to Premature wear . Because you are going beyond what a Team of engineers designed . If that's not the case Why didn't they use 52T/48/40 As options or actual Builds ?
All I'm saying is what works on paper might not be so great in actual application . Plus you have no ring guard .
I also used the Dekas, but the 48tooth, easy swap out, no special tools. I did need LBS to change the torque settings in the software to change chainring sizes. Also replaced rear cassette but stuck with the original Shimano configuration.
View attachment 71339
Don't take this wrong But what are you talking about ? Change Torque Settings ? What Torque settings ? There are none on The Vado's motor. There's no torque sensor . I went with the Praxis Chainring so I could install the guard. I never went to the Dealer . In Fact I know the Mechanic personally at My LBS . He told me No to what you are saying your LBS did . I haven't had any issues after 320 miles since the change . PLEASE CLARIFY THIS:
 
I went with the 48T simply because the 52T seems like once you install the chain . Is going to be really close to the chain Stay . Keep in Mind that Specialized designed the Bike around the 48T Ring . IMO if you start going to far past what designers felt was optimal. You'll screw up the allowable tolerances they built the bike on.
I also will say although I like how the 48T Feels . Once you turn on Power . Getting to cadence to sustain 28 MPH is hardly any different then the 40 T was. I hindsight : With My Generic Bikes I don't use most of the gears either.

As far as removing the Chainring on a Vado . All you need is an 5 MM wrench . Plus a NM/In pounds Torque Wrench. Proper torque is a Must . Proper Torque is what makes things work or not work. It's super easy to do IMO 52T is going to lead to Premature wear . Because you are going beyond what a Team of engineers designed . If that's not the case Why didn't they use 52T/48/40 As options or actual Builds ?
All I'm saying is what works on paper might not be so great in actual application . Plus you have no ring guard .

Don't take this wrong But what are you talking about ? Change Torque Settings ? What Torque settings ? There are none on The Vado's motor. There's no torque sensor . I went with the Praxis Chainring so I could install the guard. I never went to the Dealer . In Fact I know the Mechanic personally at My LBS . He told me No to what you are saying your LBS did . I haven't had any issues after 320 miles since the change . PLEASE CLARIFY THIS:
After I made the change from 40 to 48tooth my LBS said they should change the torque settings in the software. As I can’t confirm what, if anything, they changed, perhaps the definition they gave is incorrect. I suppose I could call them and ask for clarity of the change: they didn’t charge me for the update: so it wasn’t winter air in the tires.
 
After I made the change from 40 to 48tooth my LBS said they should change the torque settings in the software. As I can’t confirm what, if anything, they changed, perhaps the definition they gave is incorrect. I suppose I could call them and ask for clarity of the change: they didn’t charge me for the update: so it wasn’t winter air in the tires.
I'm only questioning it because it doesn't make any sense . Maybe they were thinking Bosch with Torque sensors . But even that shouldn't need adjustments . Not questioning you . But I can only assume the LBS made an error . And since they weren't charging you didn't bother to add flame to a fire that shouldn't have been lit in the first place. I would like to know though . Because it makes me question if I made a mistake : Thanks
 
As far as removing the Chainring on a Vado . All you need is an 5 MM wrench . Plus a NM/In pounds Torque Wrench.

Please don't mix up things again that have been elaborately clarified.

You swapped your Specialized 40T chainring to a Specialized 48T chainring. As both of them have threads in the chainring and do not use the 2-piece-chainringbolts, there is no need to hold a part of the bolt from the back whilst you're screwing it from the front.

It is different with third party chainrings that use the 2-part-chainringbolts! Now you tell me how you would fasten them with proper Nm without getting hold of them from the back.
 
Back