So, straight up comparison question of 4 e-mtb. I can compare motor things myself at the bike shops. I can ride models with each motor back to back. What I don’t know: which one of these would do the best as an “all around” bike used largely for class 4 roads, light trails and gravel.
Canyon Spectral:ON:
https://www.canyon.com/en-us/electr.../3389.html?dwvar_3389_pv_rahmenfarbe=M129_P07
Pluses: Cost. Probably the least expensive. Reviewed pretty well.
Minuses: Probably prefer bosch or TQ motors ( back to back testing may resolve that )
Norco: fluid VLT C3 or C2 depending on price. Expected to be more than the canyon but less than the trek.
Pluses: Price is competitive and may even undercut the canyon depending on what the shop offers.
Minuses: Outside of TQ being quieter than bosch, not a whole lot That I can see.
Trek fuel exe 8 gx t-type: This bike is gone from trek. I found one at a shop a few hours drive away.
Pluses: TQ motor makes this basically a normal bike for me. Super quiet. I love that. Reviews are extraordinary.
Minuses: Obtaining it. Not purchased from local dealership. Aluminum (which I still don’t know if that is a plus or minus for me) and, obviously reduced power which could be a plus or minus as well.
Trek fuel exe carbon transmission:
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/...-exe-9-8-gx-axs-t-type/p/41656/?colorCode=red
Pluses: All the natural riding feeling with TQ. Quiet, etc. Can get at a local dealer
Minuses: Most expensive on this short list. And same potential flaws as the aluminum model above. But 40% more money.
There are a few others like ari timp peak, but I didn’t include them because I didn’t see any reason to pay more than what is listed above. Obviously, canyon and ari are bike in a box solutions Which may have local support issues. However the parts are mostly standard, so just worried about the frame.
Hopefully doing another on-bike comparison tomorrow.