fooferdoggie
Well-Known Member
The bigger cassette helped. I had to replace it as the 8th cog was too worn, and the chain was jumping. but I was able ot spin more and not push as hard.
So your power numbers diifer significantly but all other exertion indicators are the same. Could at least one of your power meters be off?The ride felt about the same on the trek, and I felt about as warm. If I go by calories and heart rate they are about the same. I did not get the peak 150HR on the 10% grade but it felt close to the same effort. but the watts are far different I really had to keep the watts at 200 to keep my heart rate up. I have never gotten 165 average on the trek.
I only made 3mph faster on the trek, and the motor still did 50% I dont think I could get that workout on my usual tour I jsut cant go fast enough.
That's what I am thinking. Most likely the bosch. or the way it's set up. its not made to measure your watts but to make the bike work well. but it could also just be the difference in bikes. it could be my cadence is higher; I tend to get 85 to 90 on the acoustic, but usually only 80 on the trek. since this is a commute all the starting and stopping throws off the cadence.So your power numbers diifer significantly but all other exertion indicators are the same. Could at least one of your power meters be off?
Ya I am not too worried about it I just want the daily average to know how my energy levels and health are. Now that I know o can push more the tandem and the trek are more enjoyable and I get a better workout. I would not mind 100 or so watts of help on the steepest hills they are miserable without help.In my experience, drive unit power meters read low. I've also seen crank and pedal based power meters read high. The only way to be sure is to calibrate it with a known weight.
Perfect. You are not training for racing with a coach that needs accuracy. As long as it's consistent.Ya I am not too worried about it I just want the daily average to know how my energy levels and health are. Now that I know o can push more the tandem and the trek are more enjoyable and I get a better workout. I would not mind 100 or so watts of help on the steepest hills they are miserable without help.
Your one steep hill ( I've seen the pictures. ) is enough tp justify a small motor and battery like the conversions @PedalUma makes. I think Trek makes something like that, a proper lightweight road bike with an electric boost. Worth consideringI weigh 212 so I am not light. and I am 62 years old. The bigger tires would be for comfort. but its been so long since I rode a regular bike I dont really know. but it is nice to know how many watts I can put out. I usually coast down steep hills anyway or use the brakes. my commute only had one just steep hill each way. for most of my non-commuting riding, I have the tandem. plus I often carry groceries.
I avoid the steepest one. There is a way right before it to go and end up on the same road that only has about 9% or so grade at the worst for a block; the rest is a bit less. My HR still gets to 150 doing it, but it is a bit easier. If I walk the bike up that steep part, my HR is about the same. I can also avoid the climbs altogether by going a different route. It is about .5 miles longer. Coming up there is a 3 to 5% grade way that’s about 3 blocks I can go too. There is a longer way with a slight slope I can go too. But I would like maybe 100 watts of help on those hills to make life a little more fun.Your one steep hill ( I've seen the pictures. ) is enough tp justify a small motor and battery like the conversions @PedalUma makes. I think Trek makes something like that, a proper lightweight road bike with an electric boost. Worth consideringmaybe.