It is not 100% correct statement.Once again the answer to op's question is, all of the mainstream companies do 250W nominal because that is the legal limit in their major market EU. As simple as that.
Without me knowing, it seems you are the early protester I spoke of... Basically you've just outed yourself as a hypocrite ... I assume you wasn't forced to reply, or did it touch a nerve and you just had too?Pure guesswork on the part of you and Johnny. From my perspective you both are full of it. Stop guessing at the behavior of those with whom you differ as based on your projections, neither of you get it. I am actually quite happy with my gen 4 bosch motors and still like my Gen 2s I ride for different reasons than do you and really do not feel the need for any more power than I have right now.
Without me knowing, it seems you are the early protester I spoke of... Basically you've just outed yourself as a hypocrite ... I assume you wasn't forced to reply, or did it touch a nerve and you just had too?
In any case, your admission came faster than I expected, they've not even changed the laws yet In Northerner California this ebike is cool.
Fine tuning your trolling techniques? LOLWithout me knowing, it seems you are the early protester I spoke of... Basically you've just outed yourself as a hypocrite ... I assume you wasn't forced to reply, or did it touch a nerve and you just had too?
In any case, your admission came faster than I expected, they've not even changed the laws yet
Actually, thats not correct, either. However in Poland the licensing and insurance laws may make some of that correct as those do vary between member states.It is not 100% correct statement.
EU law allows up to 4 kW, up to 45 km/h e-bikes under the condition that:
- Both motor and e-bike manufacturer can prove above any doubt the product meets the demands of road-worthiness required from a moped (Certificate of Compliance)
- The owner of such S-Pedelec will accept and follow all requirements demanded from a moped rider.
Actually, thats not correct, either. However in Poland the licensing and insurance laws may make some of that correct as those do vary between member states.
In the EU, allowable types of 'ebikes' are classified as L1e-A 'powered cycles' and those are the 250w, 25 km/h throttle-less pedelecs we all know. L1e-A's do in fact only need a CoC (Certificate of Compliance) which is a manufacturer attestation (a simple piece of paper) issued by the manufacturer that claims the bike to be in compliance with all relevant EU laws pertaining to that bicycle's classification. This simple manufacturer statement is a HUGE deal when considering the next class. which is what @Stefan Mikes was talking about:
The 4kw / 45 km/h class is the L1e-B 'Speed Pedelec'. An L1e-B is not considered an ebike or a bicycle. It is regulated as a moped, which means restrictions on where it can ride (no bike lanes, generally) and usually requires a license plate and insurance (these things so far may vary from one member country to another). But the HUGE difference is a CoC is not accepted for the L1e-B.
Instead, they are subjected to something known as 'Type Approval'. What is that? Well, every single component on the bike must be tested for compliance via a special - and very expensive - certification process. The certification must be performed by a specially licensed independent facility. If a device is subject to Type Approval, the manufacturer's attestation of compliance is not accepted. Not only is Type Approval an onerous and expensive process, if you change the parts on the device, it requires re-certification. Think about how components can shift from bike to bike during a production run as supply chains flex. None of that flies on a product subject to Type Approval. The last I looked, a Type Approval certification ran in the ballpark of 40-50,000 Euro.
There is also a requirement known as Factor 4 which is not mandatory. Yet. Factor 4 states that an L1e-B's assist system cannot provide more than 4x the muscle input power. Factor 4 has a complicated history and I'm hopeful that enough time has passed since its proposal that it will never make it into the formal regulations.
European Commission Confirmed Categorization Speed E-Bikes
BRUSSELS, Belgium - The European Commission has used this year's transition period for the new e-bike type-approval procedure to shed light on a number of unclear issues. One major issue was the categorization of different types of speed e-bikes.www.bike-eu.com
LEVA-EU makes case for softening speed-pedelec rules in Europe
European light electric vehicle representative LEVA-EU has made a case alongside manufacturers for a reclassification on speed-pedelec legislation.cyclingindustry.news
750 W. You're an American, aren't you?because they want or need more than 250W nominal for their style of riding.
Also a fan of Apple?@MartsEbike it must be hard going through life so clueless
m@robertson:
Although the facts you have given are basically correct, you don't live in Europe and might only have a foggy idea how things actually work in the Union. Although some country e-bike laws are different (for example, a valid, registered, insured L1e-B can be ridden by a holder of a driving license in Denmark on any road including bike paths; while only riding with traffic is allowed in other EU countries), the e-bike rules are pretty consistent throughout the EU.
The Type Approval document you are talking about has the formal name: "EU Certificate of Conformity", and I can show you one issued by Specialized. The same CoC, or Type Approval document is used for anything motorized: motorbikes, cars, or trucks. It is called EU CoC though.
The L1e-A class, that is, 25 km/h, 250 W-1 kW e-bike has been largely ignored by European national jurisdictions. Generally, L1e-A is a moped. Therefore, a L1e-A cargo e-bike needs to be registered the same way as a moped. (Still, 1 kW is not 4).
To summarize: the fact L1e-A is defined in the Union law doesn't mean the class was adopted in national law of most of EU countries. And that is not going to happen fast. Some countries still struggle with defining e-scooters in their law.
P.S. If you quote the EU law, I might quote the U.S. Federal law and then ask how it comes so many Americans ride > 750 W monsters. (It would be a rhetorical question of course).
Ironically you quote EU law yet ride an unrestricted ebikeP.S. If you quote the EU law, I might quote the U.S. Federal law and then ask how it comes so many Americans ride > 750 W monsters. (It would be a rhetorical question of course).
You must respect his authorityOn a side note:
Many ebikers In these forums were harassed by regular cyclist for riding ebikes. People don't like it when a regular cyclists call them for them for it.
It is ridiculous to see some of these ebikers becoming fanboys and showing the same unacceptable attitude towards other ebikers just because they want or need more than 250W nominal for their style of riding. Really? Now you are calling people for getting more support?
What is next people getting less then 100W calling out people who get more ?
If you are so concerned about the amount of support then please ride a regular bike and If you still want to ride an ebike then don't be surprised when being called out by a regular cyclist.
It came to a point that an individual who never owned anything but a single brand, who is barely averaging 90W, thinks getting 250W nominal and much higher peaks are ok, but begins to insult others when they mention cases that requires more. That is an unhealthy state of mind.
FWIW my last estimated FTP in Zwift was a bit over 260W(last one was 264W to be exact, I can probably do better if I am fresh), I can also exceed 800W without getting off the saddle so my fitness is ok. I can do each and every climb with a regular bike.
YET I still can find a use case for all systems including the lower powered fazua for mtb/xc, mainstream like bosch drives for touring bikes and the higher powered dd's which are a delight to ride on the road.
Fine tuning your trolling techniques? LOL
So often the reply is but this bike has the power to climb Mount Everest (why do you need more?) - which is true, but its the way it delivers the power which could be improved for other types of riding. This is why I still like Hub Drive bikes - the power delivery is better (for gaining speed - not altitude) and more consistent.... The dream is combining the best elements from both types of motor but that's hard to achieve.