I'll go first. I'm a 75 year-old recreational rider in so-so shape. I ride a 65-pound, 500W torque-sensing rear hub-drive — mostly on a mix of flats and short, steep grades of up to 16% (max 22% so far) with some offroad.
Always pedal with a workout on every ride. Use PAS 1/9 over 90% of the time. To maintain the 75-85 rpm cadence that my knees and I strongly prefer, I use gearing first, then PAS. Occasional blips of throttle provide any needed bursts of speed, as knees require. Little interest in speeds above 25 mph.
Took 3 mods to arrive at what seems to be optimal gearing...
Stock. 42t chainring (not narrow-wide), 9-speed 11-34t cassette, 34.0-105.0 gear inches.
Mod 1. New 38t chainring, same stock 11-34t cassette, 30.7-95.0 gear inches.
Mod 2. Back to stock 42t chainring but upgraded to 10-speed 11-42t cassette and matching derailleur, 27.5-105.0 gear inches.
Mod 3 (current). New narrow-wide 40t chainring, same 11-42t cassette, 26.2-100.0 gear inches.
Went to Mod 1 for better climbing, but the 34.0" bottom gear was still too high, and the 95.0" top gear was a little too low. Planned to live with it, but 3 months later, the stock Shimano Alivio derailleur failed and took the stock chain with it.
Took that opportunity to revise gearing again — hence Mod 2. Worked well till I started encountering even steeper hills (18-22%). That left me wishing for an even lower bottom gear, but planned to live with it till the chain started dropping off the chainring in bottom gear on the steepest grades (probably suboptimal chain line). Seemed like a narrow-wide chainring was in order — hence Mod 3.
Current Mod 3 seems ideal for my riding style and conditions. Fingers crossed, no chain drops so far. Since hub motor heating has never been a problem, my LBS mechanic suggested more assist on the steepest hills to reduce chain tension in bottom gear (remember, it's a hub-drive). I try, but old low-assist habits die hard.