Dallant
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
I certainly would say that the Zefal did it’s job in a 10-15 mph crash on the side of the helmet and I’m very glad I had it on! Note the area I marked on the Zefal Pic below and you can clearly see the significant crack in the styrofoam that shows it absorbed a lot more of the energy than just what the scratched surface would indicate. I’m very glad it did! That said, had I been going 25-30 mph down a steep hill, I’m not sure it would have protected me as well.Just to clarify, if the cheap Zefal did it’s job and it looks like it did it well since you’re still posting seemingly coherent sentences , doesn’t that say the different between cheap and expensive helmets is really not that much? Of course there are many variables in a bike crash. It seems like a scientific study is warranted just like testing car crashes with dummies. I wonder if these tests are already done but not made all that public since it would hurt sales of the expensive helmets. If the tests show benefits, one would think these companies would not be shy to share them to push sales.
Considering that 10 years ago I might not have bothered to even wear a bike helmet out of shear laziness, this incident certainly makes me very glad I already had a better (I assume) MIPS helmet on order that did arrive today.
BTW, I felt my head bounce off the concrete and was immediately VERY GLAD I was wearing a helmet!