Throttles and California

How strong a rider do you have to be to pull this off? I'm not all that strong, but I can sustain 150-200W long enough to climb any hill here. Rarely have to resort to the SL's highest assist level and usually climb in the lowest.

Power to climb hills is largely a question of how fast you expect to go. A 250 pound rider can get up a 20% grade with <150w if they are willing to go 4mph (and have proper gearing to spin that slowly). I climb 10-15% hills all the time on my non-electric, and I'm neither lightweight or super fit. I'm just gearing down and grinding up slowly at ~150w. A 250w mid drive will climb almost anything with almost any rider, you just need proper gearing and to accept that you won't be doing it at 20+mph.
 
Try out that attitude with the car driving public and see how far it goes. If someone is using a car (or a bike) for routine transportation, time to complete the task (of which the ride is just a means to and end and not an end in itself) and convenience are crucial. If you are merely engaging in recreation, then yeah sure slow down and enjoy the scenery.

But when the bike is not a toy and its job is to get you places so you can perform routine daily tasks, things are different. A real-world example: I ride my bike to do my business banking and post office runs during my work day. And get back to the office in time to continue my job. If I can't do this in a timely fashion, I have to drive. Being able to go faster means one less car on the road.

This misconception is probably the most insidious when it comes to preventing cycling from displacing the automobile. Riders ascribe virtue to effort. They ignore the value of time and convenience, or even worse denigrate those things. And so they help cement the automobile in its place through their efforts.
I don't know, when you look at some hard numbers about how people use e-bikes they don't seem to be going screaming fast...


Shared micromobility provides people with more options for short trips. On average, the typical scooter user or bikeshare annual/monthly pass-holder rides for 11-12 minutes and 1-1.5 miles.
Just for reference, 12 minutes for 1.5 miles is 7.5 mph average speed.

This study from China is also interesting:

 
CARB published a list of eligible bikes for its up to $2000 incentive program to buy new eBikes in California. The first wave of $3.5 million was gone within one minute. 90 percent of the bikes on that official State of California list are now unlawful. See the list below. A 5 foot 3 grandma on a Pace 500 is an outlaw criminal under state law when she was just approved to buy one by the State for free with a voucher. This is our most popular bike for those stately women over 67. Lock her up!

1735961434558.png


 
Last edited:
30mph is extremely fast unassisted without a downhill or massive tailwind. Its doable, for short distances, by very fit cyclists, but absolutely nobody is sustaining that for long.
You have to scroll back a bit and see that I was responding to someone who mistakenly asserted the speed was "virtually impossible to achieve" which I know to be wrong because I have done it versus just talking about it. And I wasn't the 'world class pro' he qualified his internet-smart-only assertion with. So, I was never saying anything about being able to do that all day long (or whatever), merely countering a keyboard rider's claims with bicycle rider experience.

And yes, I was pretty good at that time. At 6'0" and about 135 lbs, with a 33 inseam, a sub-20 lb 59cm bike (built in I think 1984 so that weight was on par with the pro level at the time) 175mm crankarms and a top gear of 53-12. Me and the bike were built for it. I was riding something like 300 miles a week at the time, and when I was still single and living on campus I was also riding mornings in a tight pace line with pro and top club riders.

20230629_113215.jpg


We don't need to resort to online calculators to figure out whats normal for humans, we can just look at what professional cyclists maintain. World tour professional cyclists in a pack are averaging mid 20s on flat stages, and maybe 30mph during short time trials. The current hour world record is ~35mph.
I was chasing a car, them on the road and me in the bike lane. At the end of it I was absolutely demo'd. The thing I remember most was not the pain in the legs but the breathing, which is what really stopped me. Distance for the run according to Google Maps (I just checked) was about 3.2 miles. So hardly a stage on the Tour, but again remember the (false) claim was it was a speed that could not be reached in the first place

it sounds like you should have been doing professional time trials or something. Thats very, very fast.
My life at that time was work and school, with work funding school (and rent+food) and the bike being my sole means of transportation. If I could have had more training time before I had to join the workforce, I'd have had a shot but thats not how the chips fell.
This is all well and good, but we have always had a perfectly legal way to ride two wheel bikes without power or speed limits. They are called motorcycles.
Yes but that is not reflective of the choices available NOW versus the past. At one time we always had horses for perfectly legal transport too. But when something better came along we changed what we did (and there was mighty resistance for a time in the shift away from horses).

I get that everyone wants to spend less time commuting, but I also get that pedestrians, runners, cyclists etc don't particularly want to share their off-road infrastructure with motor vehicles.
Again yes BUT... in our country only a tiny fraction of the population uses that infrastructure. Look at that Google Maps pic I posted earlier. A bike lane on the street,. A very nice 2-lane path off-street... and both are empty. Which is normal even when the road is packed with traffic. Without the potential for growth offered by ebikes, in our auto-centric society its going to stay that way. Long term, the gasoline-era cycling mentality is inevitably going away, just as the scorn for derailleurs went away a century ago. Derailleurs similarly democratized cycling for the 'soft'... but the meek inherited the earth. And like it or not, its happening again. The question is only how much time it takes.

In fact, that infrastructure was built specifically so they had a place to walk/ride without having to deal with motor vehicles. Surely you understand that retorting "but I have s*it to do and need to go fast" doesn't assuage those concerns.
The hard truth is, in the USA at least there aren't enough daily cyclists to make that a priority for society, versus the benefits to that society of automobile replacement. Yes, analog riders are going to be displaced. But from what I am seeing here in a very bike-friendly community, the analog commuters largely replaced their bikes with ebikes. Riders are still on the paths, but the old-school muscle-power bikes seemed to disappear. The only analog riders left in quantity are the dedicated road bike riders and they stay on the streets here, since the paths are too crowded with foot traffic.
 
Last edited:
Not to take away any of that study's conclusions (haven't read it yet) but I notice it was published in 2019, meaning the data was gathered prior to that. Given how fast this market is moving, that ebike world doesn't really resemble the one we live in now.
Just for reference, 12 minutes for 1.5 miles is 7.5 mph average speed.
On my current daily driver, which I geared down for hills and to cope with pedestrian-laden trails where I want to still pedal, I am doing 6-12 mph on the paths and cruising at about 18-20 when I switch to a flat road. On the steep part of hills I'm at 6, and 12 for the less painful grades. So... not exactly a menace to society. My 30 mph commute days are over as that was an entirely different urban area plus I work from home now.

Likewise I haven't read the Chinese study, but I'll say that speed is relative to the society in question. What I'm saying for instance does not apply at all to the parts of the EU I have cycled in. Riding in downtown Amsterdam on a Friday during the lunch hour is utterly different than anything you could ever find anywhere in the US, and a 10 mph speed is pushing your luck big time. Same goes for the Brussels metro area, Antwerp etc. Totally different world. I get completely how in the EU they have lower speed tolerance that makes sense for the kind of urban environment, level of bicycle traffic and foot traffic they have there.
 
Last edited:
I wrote a local politician the following, noting that his eBike, that I got him as new replacement for free, is an outlaw bike that cannot be ridden in any public place, the following:

Start by locking up Jennifer Lynn Sibel Newsome and her mom. Then lock up all the little old ladies on eBikes, then all the cargo moms like Alexandra H.. on Sunny Slope and Natalie V.. along with Deb F.. at City Hall, plus anyone who rides any one of the City’s bikes including the Chief of Police. Turn yourself in. Now. You are a wanted fugitive. Bounty hunters are after you.
 
I kinda doubt anyone intends on going after people riding bosch mid-drives and the like. The problem is that lots of companies straight up ignore any and all power limits, and you get companies selling bikes with thousands of watts of potential power and then wink-wink-nudge-nudge pretending that its a 750w motor and meets the legal definition when it doesn't and never did.

It would probably help the industry if the power limits were more clearly spelled out (like "750w nominal, at no point can the motor draw more than 1000w" or whatever). The way its written kinda sucks, but its also hard to argue that the industry was making any sort of good faith effort to follow the limits.

Potential motor power would matter a lot less if companies and riders largely followed the class speed cutoffs. But, again, you can't argue that thats the case at all.

I wrote a local politician the followin...
Turn yourself in. Now. You are a wanted fugitive. Bounty hunters are after you.

Thats a pretty entertaining way to get yourself on some FBI watchlist.
 
The UK is turning against allowing scooters and its actually off the back of public opinion on the utter lawlessness of the UK these days.
They are ridden at any power, at any speed they can do by riders ranging from 10 to 80 with zero respect for laws or consequence.
Yoy can buy them for buttons off the net and the police are utterly disinterested until someone gets seriously injured, mindless wide open throttle is the same on ebikes, thats why the EU banned them except on rental scooters.
You cant just have sensible people using them, they gravitate to the idiots and then everyone gets tarred.
Youtube batters me with 70mph super scooters ridden by kids wearing fullface helmets or doing wheelies on tricked out Surrons down the pavements.

They gather in huge packs intimidating the public like some duracell Hells Angels and the comments are full of praise of their badasdness.

Its like the Mods and Rockers on repeat.

Im not preaching from conversion, Ive still got a throttle.
 
Youtube batters me with 70mph super scooters ridden by kids wearing fullface helmets or doing wheelies on tricked out Surrons down the pavements.

They gather in huge packs intimidating the public like some duracell Hells Angels and the comments are full of praise of their badasdness.

Yeah, I see a lot of those. The best part is when they get confronted for their dickishness they instantly fall back on "its an ebike, its legal, you can't tell me I can't ride it here neener neener". And once out of earshot they laugh about how they know they aren't but get away with it anyway. I don't even talk to friends in the MTB advocacy world anymore because its depressing hearing them rant about Surrons/etc. Like, if everyone was on a class 1 access would be no issue but the people who build trails are absolutely exhausted of dealing with idiots on emotos, and its not even like the old days where you can tell them they aren't allowed on the trails and not have a massive entitled argument about how "these are ebikes, see, they have pedals (that aren't even connected to anything), stop ruining our fun karen etc etc".
 
I've spoken privately with a few people who maintain MTB trails and they are talking about putting barriers in place that you can reasonably hoist an FS MTB over but won't be practical for most people to get a heavy e-moto over.

And a lot more MTB routes are not being published or shared to keep the yahoos off of them. Kind of like what's happened with surfing and rock climbing.
 
They are a thing now and have one great advantage, they are quiet and dont drive locals potty with the noise.
We need to make places for them until they get bored, trails and jump courses that are electric motorbike only, you wont know they are there from 500 ft away, keep them off the roads and mtb trails.
 
Back