The Green Room

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here’s another manifestation of the existential crisis.
Maybe, maybe not.
They didn't just count, you know. To account for
the network’s roughly tenfold increase in detection efficiency since its inception in 2004,
they applied some "adjustments"

and of course, they chose and cherry picked
Holzworth and his colleagues furthermore limited their analysis to strokes recorded in June, July, and August since lightning activity is highest in summer months.

meanwhile others do not find it
Researchers at Vaisala recently analyzed archival data from the Global Lightning Detection Network (GLD360), which they own and operate. Between 2012 and 2020, they didn’t find a substantial increase in the fraction of lightning occurring over the Arctic. However, they acknowledge that their data set spans a shorter time period than the WWLLN data that Holzworth and his colleagues analyzed.

 
Last edited:
Here’s another manifestation of the existential crisis. I’m sure these observations will be debunked soon by the same crowd now going after Dr. Fauci.
Look at the intensity of cherry picking going on. All they found is that 2 years compared, one is triple the other. Why did they pick 2010?

the fraction of lightning occurring in the Arctic increased from roughly 0.2% in 2010 to a little over 0.6% in 2020

and they excluded other seasons. On what reasonable basis do they exclude other seasons? none.

limited their analysis to strokes recorded in June, July, and August since lightning activity is highest in summer months.

So why would they refuse to include them?

It appears to be yet another cherrypicking session to get name in the spotlight

I’m sure these observations will be debunked soon by the same crowd now going after Dr. Fauci.
If he could just stop lying for a couple of weeks....
 
Last edited:
The region's air typically doesn't suit strikes - so they have become an important climate crisis indicator
So they naturally compared the region's air conditions to strikes stats...NOPE.

Looking at the study, time to note the funny approach.
1. they delineate the relationship between local humidity and temperature and local lightning strikes
2 they choose to not use local temperature/humidity data. You must ask "On what basis do they refuse to use the respective conditions that they themselves say foment the strikes?"
 
Last edited:
Have a Friend I had not heard from for a month,I think He was a bit skeptical about this whole covid affair He became extremely ill and ended up in the Veterans hospital with covid and pneumonia, He is on the mend now, Folks I am serious its nothing to trifle about. Something else a conspiracy monger may take from this is, the groups of people they seriously do not like have proven resistant to vaccinations and the next"Andromeda strain" the war labs unleash will wipe out a large percentage of these "free thinkers"
( Covid vaccination "Mark of the Beast"?😒
 
Well this raises a few question .... Or at least it should?

Ill hold what I see... pretty evident I think. Maybe the Healthy that passed wasnt so healthy?

The CDC director just said over 75% of “covid deaths” occurred in people with at least four comorbidities. Since Biden can’t shut down covid, suddenly all this data is getting shared publicly


they are gonna finally revise the death counts now that Biden owns them

 
Well this raises a few question .... Or at least it should?

Ill hold what I see... pretty evident I think. Maybe the Healthy that passed wasnt so healthy?

The CDC director just said over 75% of “covid deaths” occurred in people with at least four comorbidities. Since Biden can’t shut down covid, suddenly all this data is getting shared publicly


they are gonna finally revise the death counts now that Biden owns them

The CDC is using a bunkum study that should be withdrawn. The director should be removed for lying so egregiously as a habit
Here is an intelligent look into it:
 
Hey! I found another one to use the magic Ignore Button. It works wonders. If you haven't tired it yet you should.
Wont bother me lol... ignoring is so childish but I am not surprised... I listen to all views.. Makes me think.. Just another closed minded person who cant have a discussion and or will never learn but again.. Plz Ignore...

Nothing personal on my end.. Id buy anyone here lunch at anytime... its a conversation.. Wow..lol.
 
Wont bother me lol... ignoring is so childish but I am not surprised... I listen to all views.. Makes me think.. Just another closed minded person who cant have a discussion and or will never learn but again.. Plz Ignore...

Nothing personal on my end.. Id buy anyone here lunch at anytime... its a conversation.. Wow..lol.
More gaslighting
 
Well this raises a few question .... Or at least it should?

Ill hold what I see... pretty evident I think. Maybe the Healthy that passed wasnt so healthy?

The CDC director just said over 75% of “covid deaths” occurred in people with at least four comorbidities. Since Biden can’t shut down covid, suddenly all this data is getting shared publicly


they are gonna finally revise the death counts now that Biden owns them

Well this raises a few question .... Or at least it should?

Ill hold what I see... pretty evident I think. Maybe the Healthy that passed wasnt so healthy?

The CDC director just said over 75% of “covid deaths” occurred in people with at least four comorbidities. Since Biden can’t shut down covid, suddenly all this data is getting shared publicly


they are gonna finally revise the death counts now that Biden owns them

Wow … I’m out of here.
392A633A-F3EC-42CA-8567-FCC3436C8113.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back