Went on a 26 mi round town ride on the mostly new Como 5 today.
Stopped by the LBS and changed the tire circumference setting. Disappointingly, I had my ratios reversed, the tire circumference number needs to be smaller to make the computer think the tire is going to have more revolutions per mile. When I got back and checked the distance it was shorter! Big bummer there, the guys at the lbs like me though, now that they have a concession stand open I bought them a cold one
. New numbers will be 82 for the Como and 84 for the Vado I believe.
I like the tires on the Como. The smooth tread, seems to be less rolling resistance than the Triggers on the Vado and I have more confidence in the smooth tread in cornering on pavement.
First long run on the very new Brooks B67 saddle. It is a keeper. The OEM saddle was chaffing the back of the leg where it meets the front of the saddle. Dowsed the Brooks saddle in neetsfoot oil and it is good to go. Think I got the last one in the U.S.!
Also installed 200 mm brake rotors front and back, leftovers from the Vado experiment. Certainly a difference in stopping. Note: was on the Vado a few weeks ago running downhill on a sidewalk where it meets an overpass with a curve before it crosses the road, the road also has a curve so an oncoming cars line of sight is not the farthest, mine was farther and I came to a pretty quick stop with some scratch laying and sideways movement of the back tire. He came to a stop also but I don't think I could have made it across the road before he crossed my path. Like to think the brakes saved me on that one.
Also noticed on the Como the seating position is rearward almost directly over the back tire, because of this the movement of the front tire over bumps is felt very little at the ass point.
Can't go wrong with the Vado or Como, but I'm really liking the Como. Ride on!