Your correct in that they do weigh more. Like about 5+ lbs I would assume. On the lightest power setting they do not feel sluggish especially with the tires psi being somewhere near 60. It is nice to remove the battery and it is quick and convenient. The range for me is about 70 miles on a charge. That riding at the eco setting and averaging around 19 mph on flat to rolling roads. I test rode the Specialized Turbo Creo also and really liked it too. I have a hair under 1500 miles on mine. The Bosch system has been trouble free. The other question is what is available? The Domane's in the US are pretty tough to get.i think what is nudging me away from the trek is the weight - though maybe a more accurate real-world comparison is necessary to see what the difference in weight between the specialized, trek and pinarello would be.
I keep my bike in my unheated garage and haven't had any issues, but I live in Vancouver which in the winter is warmer than the majority of Canadian cities.Hi folks. I am narrowing my choices in bikes down -- I like the specialized options as they appear to be lighter (at the $10kCAD pricepoint) and have an integrated power meter in the motor. The one thing I am concerned about and makes me lean towards my alternative (currently Pinarello Nytro) is the removal of the battery. I do not have heated storage for my bikes and the temps can get pretty low over the winter. Have any other Canadian (or Northern US) owners encountered problems storing the bike in the cold?
Somewhere I read that the Creo is similar to the Diverge, but comparing it’s geometry to the Creo there are differences. Also the Diverge is set up as a gravel bike. The Roubaix is the most similar road bike. Not to start an argument, Specialized bike cost more than similarly equipped bikes from other manufacturers, so you might want to expand your search.I ride a Creo Comp Carbon in size Small and find it perfect. If I'm shopping around unpowered Specialized bikes, what would be an equivilant size and which bike does it most resemble? Per the size guide, I'm somewhat in the middle of two sizes. At 5'5" I'm a little tall for 49cm while I'm encompassed within the low end of a 52cm.
To follow up on this question, what type of bottom bracket does the Creo use and what is the minimum crankset q-factor the frame supports? Is there anything special about replacing the crankset? Not a fan of 175mm crankset/182mm q-factor.Anyone been through the process of trying to lower the Q factor on the Creo? Not seeing any options outside of the pedals and cleats. The aluminum and carbon cranks both have the same 182mm Q factor, according to Praxis. Anyone found any other options?
Answering my own question, the bottom bracket is proprietary to the motor and will not accept another crankset. Praxxis does sell the crank arms separately, as short as 160mm, available in carbon and alloy. Carbon arms ($280) are about ~150g lighter (340g vs 485g) than alloy ($80). Q-factor cannot be reduced.To follow up on this question, what type of bottom bracket does the Creo use and what is the minimum crankset q-factor the frame supports? Is there anything special about replacing the crankset? Not a fan of 175mm crankset/182mm q-factor.
Looking to improve shifting at the rear Derailleur on my 2021 Creo SL Comp. 11-42 in the rear - Sunrace. Would this be a direct replacement? (has to be lighter for sure).
View attachment 133305
Yea, factoring in in additional sweat loss for carrying 2 extra lbs up a 5 mile climb, the heavy one should be quicker....lolThere is a bike calculator app for iPhones.
5 miles with a 5%grade, rider power =150watts, rider wt=180
29lbs bike takes 49.64 minutes and speed =6.04mph.
27lbs bike takes 49.21 minutes and speed =6.1
so for the cost to decrease a Creo Sl Carbon by 2lbs-26 seconds are saved on a 5 mile climb. On a level 5 mile ride only 2 seconds are saved.