Both are right, as people usually say that Harleys are handicapped by their use of outdated technology, and they aren't wrong when it comes to their brand focus. Sad thing is that HD has proven they can make very advanced designs, but the consumers are always right, and consumers seemed to just keep buying the antiquated technology products insisting on pushrods and air cooling that severely limit their performance because of the traditionalist image. They focused marketing on that core audience, but problem with one-dimensional brand marketing is that by Harley focusing on this niche for so long and not investing much in diversifying, they alienate younger consumers and their old niche is aging out of buying more products. Its normal for the son to rebel against the father at a certain age, and anything their parents like they won't like if nothing more than for that reason (insert "ok boomer" meme) as a way to establish their independence... heck think about any big counter culture fad from the 60s to today that was born from that. So its important now more than ever for Harley to split its branding image with different lines. This is likely a step in the right direction for that, although I'm surprised they aren't producing a line that targets younger hipsters with some retro cruiser e-bikes as well.
I can understand why you make that argument, it's often repeated by the current moto journalists over and over. It's a shallow dive into the subject. I've owned stock in the company almost as long as I've owned their bikes. The reality is more complicated than the op-eds reveal.
I'm not brand sensitive at all and not an apologist for the company. I have plenty of criticisms. Their difficulties started around 2005, they ramped up production and manufactured way too many units. From 1989 to 2004 there were waiting lists to buy a bike. This was actually good for the company and great for the used bike market. They increased production to meet demand, then surpassed it. Then came the big recession of 2008. This caused big problems for all vehicle brands, especially premium brands. HD had their own finance division just like GMAC and scores of people defaulted on their loans. Bad debts can sink a company. HD didn't get the bailout GM did.
All through this HD owned Buell sport bike company, they even had an entry level 500cc bike. The bikes sold well. I have a friend that owns a large dealership. I was able to ride any bike I wanted. HD preferred to meet demands of their core business. HD also owned a truck body division, their biggest client was the USPS. They also owned and manufactured the luxury motorhome brand Holiday Rambler. And they developed a water cooled line of bikes in the early 2000's. I could list a lot of other high tech products they made and make, but I'll just stick to the bikes.
They continued to offer entry level 500 and 700cc bike in the 2010's. Not traditional cruisers, sport standards. They sell a range of water cooled bikes today.
The completely new 2021 adventure touring model:
All new 2022 Cafe Racer:
There are other new models being released. They won't be making scooters under the HD badge. It's always possible under the Serial 1 badge.
The Live Wire isn't the end of the story. Initial models are always part of research and development. No car brand is still selling their first gen EV. In the beginning stages, you don't scrap anything. Evolution is the goal. LW will end when the next gen is planned or ready.
2020 market share in the USA
HD 31.1%
Honda 20.8%
Yamaha 12.2%
Kawasaki 11.9%
Suzuki 5.3%
Lifestyle magazines rarely report business news well. People should buy and ride what they like. I've never promoted the ebikes I own and I don't promote MC's. This thread is the most I've ever written on the forum about the HD Co. There started to be some misunderstandings about the company and their ability to offer a good product to ebikers. Just my 2 cents.