fooferdoggie
Well-Known Member
what would happen is you could not peddle fast enough. or you would have to peddle faster as you don't have time to change gears. its actually harder on a mid drive then on my recumbent because you don't have the gearing and you accelerate so fast its hard to shift. I was trying to get the most acceleration in the shortest amount of time. if you had more power maybe you could start in a smaller cog but that limit how much torque you can put out to start. plus your going to rip up your drive train.On the bold, FWI, I would NEVER make a claim like that for me personally. That was addressing YOUR claim of, and I'm quoting you here "I hit 12 mph in two petal strokes in the count of two." you made earlier. I mentioned what I did thinking what might happen if you had several times the power you have. I mean, logically, that SHOULD mean that you should be able to accelerate even faster than "I hit 12 mph in two petal strokes in the count of two" right?
Yes, I get the need for more power when dealing with more weight and/or steeper hills. That's why I own/can justify an Ultra powered bike. I DO use that power on occasion.....
Oh, and I wasn't talking about MY geared hub drive bike being faster than a mid drive when accelerating from a stop to 10 mph, I was talking about ANY 500w geared hub drive bike accelerating faster (0-10mph) than a mid drive - with the exact reason you listed in mind. You can't stay up with the mid drive need to be shifted - where the hub drive likely won't even need to be shifted......
well yes the hub would not need to be shifted because you just don't have the gearing usually or the torque sensor to make it practical. I did that 12mph in two petal strokes with no shifting from a dead stop. Now I ma waiting for you to test out that 500 watt hub motor and see if you can get to 12mph in 2 seconds.