that’ll explains our minor head butting. Both curmudgeons?.....but I'm 80.
that’ll explains our minor head butting. Both curmudgeons?
I think that video is very misleading, in the video he compares the different wattage geared motors and of course they look the same, the difference is in the windings and the magnets. Then he compares a 750 watt direct drive motor to the 750 watt geared motor which is not fair at all since he never mentioned that they are totally different types of motors. He is also trying to sell you his bikes, which is ok, but a bit biased.Some interesting thoughts on why a Rad 750W motor might be underpowered....
I can see why it might look like that, but the motors compared side by side are all geared. It's just the gear cluster on the one larger 750 are removed.I think that video is very misleading, in the video he compares the different wattage geared motors and of course they look the same, the difference is in the windings and the magnets. Then he compares a 750 watt direct drive motor to the 750 watt geared motor which is not fair at all since he never mentioned that they are totally different types of motors. He is also trying to sell you his bikes, which is ok, but a bit biased.
I think that video is very misleading, in the video he compares the different wattage geared motors and of course they look the same, the difference is in the windings and the magnets. Then he compares a 750 watt direct drive motor to the 750 watt geared motor which is not fair at all since he never mentioned that they are totally different types of motors. He is also trying to sell you his bikes, which is ok, but a bit biased.
I think Mike's summed it up well. On hills you need to pay attention to torque ratings, otherwise watt rating is misleading. The only inaccuracy was "...people buying Rads get 'seduced' by the 750 watt rating, only to learn once they get it, the power is really weak". It's not a weak power, it's a torque.This {MIke's post} is a gross over simplification.
But only with specific motors that we've learned are capable. Some will fry.Ya, and we don't know if the controllers were all the same and if not what amperage they were providing the motor. It was food for thought though.
There are a lot of companies like Radpower that offer both 500 and 750 watt motors in their lineup and I've always just assumed they were the same motor just running at a different wattage. In the do it yourself forums there are lots of examples of people running two and three times the wattage through motors than what they were designed for.
This is a gross over simplification.
I would hope that by now everyone understands the fact that gear dive hubs have an unarguable advantage at low speeds and hills, but the DD have their advantages as well. Like no gears to create noise or maintenance issues, much better efficiency in situations where a lot of torque on tap is of little value (flat lands), and higher available speeds. And there's this little thing called regen a lot of people talk about, that's not available anywhere but with DD.
Name your poison (preferences). They are both (gear and direct drive) very well suited when carefully chosen. THOSE differences are the facts that need to be more widely considered/known/discussed.
I'm seeing more users learning to reprogram displays and write code for them. Both the LCD3 and the 850 are being open sourced with a couple of systems. We're doing really well with the eggRider sales. A small innocuous display that can be viewed and programmed by way of a smart phone. Good stuff happening!A few basic functions is all I really care about on the display. With the kits above, it's not about the display so much as it is about the potential configuration changes easily accessible using the display - without messing with a laptop, blue tooth, or a smart phone. Not to mention the potential performance differences due to the increased capacity.......